AMD RX 580
Model AMD RX 580 from AMD mining algorithm Autolykos2 with a maximum hashrate of 55.094918Mh for a power consumption of 72w.
Profitability
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.13 | $3.90 |
|
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.10 | $3.00 |
| Profitability | $0.03 | $0.90 |
Algorithms
| Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
|---|---|---|
|
Autolykos2
55.094918Mh - 72.0W |
1.31J | -$0.04 |
|
KAWPOW
10.147754Mh - 98.0W |
9.66J | -$0.08 |
|
Etchash
32.74Mh - 84.0W |
2.57J | -$0.10 |
|
Zhash
23h - 85.0W |
3.70J | -$0.10 |
|
Ethash
32.74Mh - 84.0W |
2.57J | -$0.12 |
|
RandomX
490h - 63.0W |
0.13J | -$0.14 |
|
CuckooCycle
2h - 93.0W |
46.50J | -$0.14 |
|
VerusHash
4.181205Mh - 74.0W |
17.70J | -$0.16 |
|
NeoScrypt
730Kh - 129.0W |
0.18J | -$0.17 |
|
cuckAToo32
0h - 74.0W |
0.00J | -$0.18 |
|
CryptoNightR
830h - 90.0W |
0.11J | -$0.22 |
|
Lyra2z
3.005Mh - 91.0W |
30.28J | -$0.22 |
|
BeamHashIII
15h - 142.0W |
9.47J | -$0.23 |
|
X16Rv2
8.44519Mh - 103.0W |
12.20J | -$0.25 |
|
KHeavyHash
116.115546Mh - 107.0W |
0.92J | -$0.26 |
|
Octopus
5.4452Mh - 126.0W |
23.14J | -$0.26 |
|
NexaPoW
6.244221Mh - 119.0W |
19.06J | -$0.27 |
|
Lyra2REv2
36.069651Mh - 110.0W |
3.05J | -$0.26 |
|
Equihash
295h - 116.0W |
0.39J | -$0.28 |
|
X16R
8.839455Mh - 118.0W |
13.35J | -$0.28 |
|
Eaglesong
346.966455Mh - 144.0W |
0.42J | -$0.35 |
|
Blake (2s)
2.645296753Gh - 154.0W |
58.22J | -$0.37 |
Specification
| Base Frequency | 1257 MHz |
| Boost Frequency | 1340 MHz |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| OpenCL | 2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
| Release | April 2017 |
| Typical Board Power (Desktop) | 185 W |
Mining pools for AMD RX 580
| Pool | Start Mining |
|---|---|
| Nicehash | nicehash.com |
| Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
| zpool | zpool.ca |
| XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
| Zergpool | zergpool.com |
| XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
| Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the AMD RX 580 in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
| Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | 6 | ||
| Nuclear | 7 | ||
| Hydroelectric | 14 | ||
| Geothermal | 23 | ||
| Solar | 27 | ||
| Biofuels | 143 | ||
| Gas | 304 | ||
| Coal | 510 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.