Nvidia GTX 1080
Model Nvidia GTX 1080 from Nvidia mining algorithm NeoScrypt with a maximum hashrate of 1.271957Mh for a power consumption of 68w.
Profitability
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.23 | $6.90 |
|
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.10 | $3.00 |
| Profitability | $0.13 | $3.90 |
Algorithms
| Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
|---|---|---|
|
NeoScrypt
1.271957Mh - 68.0W |
53.46J | $0.07 |
|
EquihashZEL
0h - 0.0W |
0.00J | $0.00 |
|
CuckooCycle
6h - 131.0W |
21.83J | -$0.06 |
|
Zhash
57h - 129.0W |
2.26J | -$0.08 |
|
KAWPOW
12.908001Mh - 130.0W |
10.07J | -$0.10 |
|
Lyra2REv2
45.11329Mh - 51.0W |
1.13J | -$0.12 |
|
BeamHashIII
19h - 120.0W |
6.32J | -$0.14 |
|
Autolykos2
57.12171Mh - 122.0W |
2.14J | -$0.16 |
|
cuckAToo32
0h - 105.0W |
0.00J | -$0.25 |
|
Etchash
35.158Mh - 160.0W |
4.55J | -$0.26 |
|
Octopus
10.252037Mh - 148.0W |
14.44J | -$0.28 |
|
CryptoNightR
718h - 117.0W |
0.16J | -$0.28 |
|
Ethash
35.158Mh - 160.0W |
4.55J | -$0.29 |
|
RandomX
786h - 133.0W |
0.17J | -$0.30 |
|
Keccak
855.08737Mh - 131.0W |
0.15J | -$0.30 |
|
Eaglesong
719.197Mh - 128.0W |
0.18J | -$0.31 |
|
Blake (2s)
4.61032913Gh - 128.0W |
27.76J | -$0.31 |
|
Lyra2z
3.982068Mh - 128.0W |
32.14J | -$0.31 |
|
X16R
25.332379Mh - 135.0W |
5.33J | -$0.31 |
|
X16Rv2
23.137274Mh - 134.0W |
5.79J | -$0.32 |
|
Quark
974.5Kh - 138.0W |
0.14J | -$0.33 |
|
Equihash
534h - 141.0W |
0.26J | -$0.34 |
|
KHeavyHash
61.306Kh - 179.0W |
2.92J | -$0.43 |
Specification
| Base Clock | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz |
| GPU Power | 180 W |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
Mining pools for Nvidia GTX 1080
| Pool | Start Mining |
|---|---|
| Nicehash | nicehash.com |
| Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
| zpool | zpool.ca |
| XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
| Zergpool | zergpool.com |
| XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
| Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia GTX 1080 in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
| Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | 6 | ||
| Nuclear | 7 | ||
| Hydroelectric | 14 | ||
| Geothermal | 22 | ||
| Solar | 26 | ||
| Biofuels | 135 | ||
| Gas | 287 | ||
| Coal | 481 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.