Nvidia GTX 1660 Super
Model Nvidia GTX 1660 Super from Nvidia mining algorithm NeoScrypt with a maximum hashrate of 743.52Kh for a power consumption of 78w.
Profitability
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.15 | $4.50 |
|
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.10 | $3.00 |
| Profitability | $0.05 | $1.50 |
Algorithms
| Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
|---|---|---|
|
NeoScrypt
743.52Kh - 71.0W |
0.10J | -$0.02 |
|
KAWPOW
11.52Mh - 86.0W |
7.47J | -$0.03 |
|
CuckooCycle
4h - 78.0W |
19.50J | -$0.03 |
|
Octopus
21.148Mh - 89.0W |
4.21J | -$0.04 |
|
Autolykos2
52.66Mh - 85.0W |
1.61J | -$0.08 |
|
Zhash
30h - 84.0W |
2.80J | -$0.09 |
|
Ethash
31.606Mh - 90.0W |
2.85J | -$0.14 |
|
Etchash
31.606Mh - 90.0W |
2.85J | -$0.14 |
|
RandomX
476h - 72.0W |
0.15J | -$0.16 |
|
NexaPoW
14.85718Mh - 95.0W |
6.39J | -$0.17 |
|
Lyra2z
1.40497Mh - 71.0W |
50.53J | -$0.17 |
|
VerusHash
3.952888Mh - 84.0W |
21.25J | -$0.18 |
|
Blake (2s)
3.260464513Gh - 78.0W |
23.92J | -$0.19 |
|
Eaglesong
504.15Mh - 79.0W |
0.16J | -$0.19 |
|
BeamHashIII
13h - 117.0W |
9.00J | -$0.19 |
|
CryptoNightR
540h - 81.0W |
0.15J | -$0.19 |
|
Keccak
578.46213Mh - 85.0W |
0.15J | -$0.19 |
|
cuckAToo32
0h - 82.0W |
0.00J | -$0.20 |
|
X16Rv2
15.49881Mh - 84.0W |
5.42J | -$0.20 |
|
Lyra2REv2
36.237844Mh - 84.0W |
2.32J | -$0.20 |
|
KHeavyHash
258.060652Mh - 98.0W |
0.38J | -$0.24 |
|
X16R
7.21481Mh - 107.0W |
14.83J | -$0.26 |
Specification
| Base Clock | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz |
| GPU Power | 125 W |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
| Max Memory Size | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 |
Mining pools for Nvidia GTX 1660 Super
| Pool | Start Mining |
|---|---|
| Nicehash | nicehash.com |
| Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
| zpool | zpool.ca |
| XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
| Zergpool | zergpool.com |
| XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
| Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia GTX 1660 Super in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
| Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | 7 | ||
| Nuclear | 8 | ||
| Hydroelectric | 16 | ||
| Geothermal | 25 | ||
| Solar | 30 | ||
| Biofuels | 154 | ||
| Gas | 329 | ||
| Coal | 551 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.