Nvidia GTX 1070
Model Nvidia GTX 1070 from Nvidia mining algorithm Autolykos2 with a maximum hashrate of 50.8201Mh for a power consumption of 111w.
Profitability
Period | /Day | /Month |
---|---|---|
Income | $0.12 | $3.60 |
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.20 | $6.00 |
Profitability | -$0.08 | -$2.40 |
Algorithms
Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
---|---|---|
Autolykos2
50.8201Mh - 99.0W |
0.51J | -$0.12 |
EquihashZEL
43h - 173.0W |
0.25J | -$0.17 |
BeamHashIII
15h - 134.0W |
0.11J | -$0.19 |
Lyra2z
1.66569Mh - 82.0W |
0.02J | -$0.20 |
Octopus
7.609Mh - 109.0W |
0.07J | -$0.21 |
Zhash
44h - 150.0W |
0.29J | -$0.21 |
Ethash
25.801Mh - 109.0W |
0.24J | -$0.21 |
CuckooCycle
4h - 111.0W |
0.04J | -$0.22 |
NexaPoW
3.20356Mh - 94.0W |
0.03J | -$0.22 |
VerusHash
3.699921Mh - 102.0W |
0.04J | -$0.21 |
X16Rv2
19.203447Mh - 95.0W |
0.20J | -$0.23 |
CryptoNightR
603h - 98.0W |
6.15J | -$0.24 |
KAWPOW
12.963993Mh - 167.0W |
0.08J | -$0.24 |
RandomX
557h - 113.0W |
4.93J | -$0.25 |
Quark
14.338828Mh - 109.0W |
0.13J | -$0.26 |
X16R
10.82502Mh - 110.0W |
0.10J | -$0.26 |
Keccak
685.95299Mh - 115.0W |
5.96J | -$0.27 |
Eaglesong
584.055Mh - 114.0W |
5.12J | -$0.27 |
NeoScrypt
892.185Kh - 138.0W |
6.47J | -$0.27 |
Etchash
26.923815Mh - 132.0W |
0.20J | -$0.28 |
Lyra2REv2
33.89918Mh - 116.0W |
0.29J | -$0.28 |
Blake (2s)
3.150026308Gh - 119.0W |
0.03J | -$0.29 |
cuckAToo32
0h - 120.0W |
0.00J | -$0.29 |
LBRY
266.907153Mh - 141.0W |
1.89J | -$0.34 |
X13
6.588065Mh - 152.0W |
0.04J | -$0.36 |
Equihash
451h - 158.0W |
2.85J | -$0.37 |
KHeavyHash
273.320992Mh - 162.0W |
1.69J | -$0.39 |
Specification
Base Clock | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1683 MHz |
GPU Power | 150 W |
Max Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
Memory Type | GDDR5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 |
Mining pools for Nvidia GTX 1070
Pool | Start Mining |
---|---|
Nicehash | nicehash.com |
Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
zpool | zpool.ca |
XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
Zergpool | zergpool.com |
XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia GTX 1070 in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
---|---|---|---|
Wind | 10 | ||
Nuclear | 11 | ||
Hydroelectric | 23 | ||
Geothermal | 36 | ||
Solar | 43 | ||
Biofuels | 220 | ||
Gas | 469 | ||
Coal | 786 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.