Nvidia GTX 1070Ti
Model Nvidia GTX 1070Ti from Nvidia mining algorithm VerusHash with a maximum hashrate of 4.654683Mh for a power consumption of 0w.
Profitability
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.04 | $1.20 |
|
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.00 | $0.00 |
| Profitability | $0.04 | $1.20 |
Algorithms
| Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
|---|---|---|
|
VerusHash
4.654683Mh - 0.0W |
InfJ | $0.04 |
|
NexaPoW
707.131Kh - 0.0W |
InfJ | $0.00 |
|
EquihashZEL
0h - 0.0W |
NaNJ | $0.00 |
|
NeoScrypt
1.04366Mh - 89.0W |
0.01J | -$0.10 |
|
KAWPOW
13.821912Mh - 123.0W |
0.11J | -$0.11 |
|
Zhash
49h - 122.0W |
0.40J | -$0.12 |
|
Autolykos2
54.706036Mh - 93.0W |
0.59J | -$0.12 |
|
BeamHashIII
18h - 135.0W |
0.13J | -$0.16 |
|
Ethash
28.405166Mh - 99.0W |
0.29J | -$0.19 |
|
CuckooCycle
5h - 123.0W |
0.04J | -$0.21 |
|
CryptoNightR
644h - 102.0W |
6.31J | -$0.22 |
|
X13
6.945865Mh - 95.0W |
0.07J | -$0.23 |
|
Etchash
28.759124Mh - 129.0W |
0.22J | -$0.24 |
|
Blake (2s)
4.04935836Gh - 111.0W |
0.04J | -$0.27 |
|
RandomX
616h - 127.0W |
4.85J | -$0.29 |
|
cuckAToo32
0h - 123.0W |
0.00J | -$0.30 |
|
Lyra2z
2.549439Mh - 123.0W |
0.02J | -$0.30 |
|
Keccak
844.543645Mh - 126.0W |
6.70J | -$0.30 |
|
Eaglesong
718.14Mh - 129.0W |
5.57J | -$0.31 |
|
X16Rv2
23.273329Mh - 130.0W |
0.18J | -$0.31 |
|
Lyra2REv2
41.31343Mh - 139.0W |
0.30J | -$0.33 |
|
KHeavyHash
335.700276Mh - 152.0W |
2.21J | -$0.36 |
|
X16R
12.70858Mh - 157.0W |
0.08J | -$0.38 |
|
Octopus
8.889818Mh - 183.0W |
0.05J | -$0.38 |
|
Equihash
466h - 181.0W |
2.57J | -$0.42 |
Specification
| Base Clock | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz |
| GPU Power | 180 W |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
Mining pools for Nvidia GTX 1070Ti
| Pool | Start Mining |
|---|---|
| Nicehash | nicehash.com |
| Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
| zpool | zpool.ca |
| XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
| Zergpool | zergpool.com |
| XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
| Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia GTX 1070Ti in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
| Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | 0 | ||
| Nuclear | 0 | ||
| Hydroelectric | 0 | ||
| Geothermal | 0 | ||
| Solar | 0 | ||
| Biofuels | 0 | ||
| Gas | 0 | ||
| Coal | 0 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.