Nvidia RTX 2080 Super Profitability


0.0%
Profitability
Period | /Day | /Month |
---|---|---|
Income | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.10 | $3.00 |
Profitability | -$0.10 | -$3.00 |
Algorithms
Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
---|---|---|
Octopus
52.26807Mh - 194.0W |
0.27 j/h |
-$0.10
/day
|
NexaPoW
994.93Kh - 80.0W |
j/Mh |
-$0.19
/day
|
KHeavyHash
383.135012Mh - 81.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.19
/day
|
KAWPOW
26.74Mh - 252.0W |
0.11 j/h |
-$0.24
/day
|
BeamHashIII
29Hh - 218.0W |
0.13 j/h |
-$0.27
/day
|
X16Rv2
35.606032Mh - 122.0W |
0.29 j/h |
-$0.29
/day
|
Autolykos2
70.3552Mh - 174.0W |
0.40 j/h |
-$0.30
/day
|
CuckooCycle
9Hh - 228.0W |
0.04 j/h |
-$0.30
/day
|
Lyra2z
3.21132Mh - 126.0W |
0.03 j/h |
-$0.30
/day
|
CryptoNightR
831Hh - 149.0W |
0.18 j/Hh |
-$0.33
/day
|
Zhash
76Hh - 235.0W |
0.32 j/h |
-$0.34
/day
|
Keccak
1.27413847Gh - 188.0W |
0.01 j/h |
-$0.37
/day
|
Etchash
44.543Mh - 192.0W |
0.23 j/h |
-$0.40
/day
|
Lyra2REv2
81.337916Mh - 171.0W |
2.10 j/Mh |
-$0.41
/day
|
Ethash
44.543Mh - 192.0W |
4.31 j/Mh |
-$0.42
/day
|
RandomX
1.067Kh - 198.0W |
j/Mh |
-$0.46
/day
|
X16R
15.46189Mh - 189.0W |
0.08 j/h |
-$0.45
/day
|
NeoScrypt
1.56308Mh - 247.0W |
0.01 j/h |
-$0.45
/day
|
Blake (2s)
6.66795276Gh - 238.0W |
0.03 j/h |
-$0.57
/day
|
Eaglesong
1.234Mh - 244.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.59
/day
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh - 293.0W |
Inf j/Hh |
-$0.70
/day
|
Description
Model Nvidia RTX 2080 Super from Nvidia mining algorithm NexaPoW with a maximum hashrate of 994.93K for a power consumption of 81w.
Specification
Boost Clock | 1815 MHz |
Core Clock | 1650 MHz |
GPU Power | 250 W |
Max Memory Bandwidth | 496 GB/s |
Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
Memory Type | GDDR6 |
OpenGL | 4.5 |
Mining pools
Pool | Start Mining |
---|---|
Nicehash | nicehash.com |
Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
zpool | zpool.ca |
XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
Zergpool | zergpool.com |
XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia RTX 2080 Super in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
---|---|---|---|
Wind | 7 | ||
Nuclear | 8 | ||
Hydroelectric | 16 | ||
Geothermal | 26 | ||
Solar | 31 | ||
Biofuels | 160 | ||
Gas | 342 | ||
Coal | 573 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.