Nvidia GTX 1080 Profitability
0.0%
Profitability
Period | /Day | /Month |
---|---|---|
Income | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.10 | $3.00 |
Profitability | -$0.10 | -$3.00 |
Algorithms
Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
---|---|---|
EquihashZEL
0Hh - 0.0W |
NaN j/h |
$0.00
/day
|
NeoScrypt
1.271957Mh - 68.0W |
0.02 j/h |
-$0.05
/day
|
Lyra2REv2
45.11329Mh - 51.0W |
1.13 j/Mh |
-$0.12
/day
|
BeamHashIII
19Hh - 120.0W |
0.16 j/h |
-$0.13
/day
|
KAWPOW
12.908001Mh - 130.0W |
0.10 j/h |
-$0.13
/day
|
Zhash
57Hh - 129.0W |
0.44 j/h |
-$0.15
/day
|
CuckooCycle
6Hh - 131.0W |
0.05 j/h |
-$0.15
/day
|
Autolykos2
57.12171Mh - 122.0W |
0.47 j/h |
-$0.19
/day
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh - 105.0W |
Inf j/Hh |
-$0.25
/day
|
CryptoNightR
718Hh - 117.0W |
0.16 j/Hh |
-$0.25
/day
|
Keccak
855.08737Mh - 131.0W |
6.53 j/h |
-$0.26
/day
|
Octopus
10.252037Mh - 148.0W |
0.07 j/h |
-$0.29
/day
|
RandomX
786Hh - 133.0W |
j/Mh |
-$0.30
/day
|
Eaglesong
719.197Mh - 128.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.31
/day
|
Blake (2s)
4.61032913Gh - 128.0W |
0.04 j/h |
-$0.31
/day
|
Lyra2z
3.982068Mh - 128.0W |
0.03 j/h |
-$0.31
/day
|
X16Rv2
23.137274Mh - 134.0W |
0.17 j/h |
-$0.32
/day
|
X16R
25.332379Mh - 135.0W |
0.19 j/h |
-$0.32
/day
|
Quark
974.5Kh - 138.0W |
7.06 j/h |
-$0.33
/day
|
Equihash
534Hh - 141.0W |
j/Kh |
-$0.34
/day
|
Etchash
35.158Mh - 160.0W |
0.22 j/h |
-$0.33
/day
|
Ethash
35.158Mh - 160.0W |
4.55 j/Mh |
-$0.35
/day
|
KHeavyHash
61.306Kh - 179.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.43
/day
|
Description
Model Nvidia GTX 1080 from Nvidia mining algorithm Lyra2REv2 with a maximum hashrate of 45.11329M for a power consumption of 68w.
Specification
Base Clock | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1733 MHz |
GPU Power | 180 W |
Max Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
Memory Type | GDDR5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 |
Mining pools
Pool | Start Mining |
---|---|
Nicehash | nicehash.com |
Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
zpool | zpool.ca |
XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
Zergpool | zergpool.com |
XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia GTX 1080 in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
---|---|---|---|
Wind | 6 | ||
Nuclear | 7 | ||
Hydroelectric | 14 | ||
Geothermal | 22 | ||
Solar | 26 | ||
Biofuels | 135 | ||
Gas | 287 | ||
Coal | 481 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.