Nvidia P104-100
Model Nvidia P104-100 from Nvidia mining algorithm Zhash with a maximum hashrate of 49h for a power consumption of 92w.
Profitability
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.16 | $4.80 |
|
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.20 | $6.00 |
| Profitability | -$0.04 | -$1.20 |
Algorithms
| Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
|---|---|---|
|
EquihashZEL
0h - 0.0W |
NaNJ | $0.00 |
|
Zhash
49h - 100.0W |
0.49J | -$0.08 |
|
Autolykos2
63.239436Mh - 100.0W |
0.63J | -$0.12 |
|
CuckooCycle
4h - 92.0W |
0.04J | -$0.15 |
|
KAWPOW
15.09662Mh - 150.0W |
0.10J | -$0.15 |
|
BeamHashIII
17h - 144.0W |
0.12J | -$0.19 |
|
Octopus
7.050622Mh - 99.0W |
0.07J | -$0.20 |
|
Lyra2REv2
34.031495Mh - 83.0W |
0.41J | -$0.20 |
|
Etchash
32.507435Mh - 122.0W |
0.27J | -$0.23 |
|
RandomX
394h - 102.0W |
3.86J | -$0.23 |
|
Ethash
32.507435Mh - 122.0W |
0.27J | -$0.24 |
|
CryptoNightR
722h - 101.0W |
7.15J | -$0.24 |
|
cuckAToo32
0h - 102.0W |
0.00J | -$0.24 |
|
Keccak
649.890275Mh - 114.0W |
5.70J | -$0.27 |
|
Blake (2s)
3.306488345Gh - 118.0W |
0.03J | -$0.28 |
|
X13
6.116274Mh - 119.0W |
0.05J | -$0.29 |
|
X16R
20.709038Mh - 124.0W |
0.17J | -$0.30 |
|
X16Rv2
20.120542Mh - 124.0W |
0.16J | -$0.30 |
|
Lyra2z
2.049046Mh - 125.0W |
0.02J | -$0.30 |
|
Equihash
445h - 128.0W |
3.48J | -$0.31 |
|
NeoScrypt
807.951Kh - 175.0W |
4.62J | -$0.33 |
|
Eaglesong
606.922Mh - 149.0W |
4.07J | -$0.36 |
Specification
| Base Clock | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz |
| GPU Power | 135 W |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s |
| Max Memory Size | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
| Release date | December 2017 |
Mining pools for Nvidia P104-100
| Pool | Start Mining |
|---|---|
| Nicehash | nicehash.com |
| Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
| zpool | zpool.ca |
| XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
| Zergpool | zergpool.com |
| XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
| Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia P104-100 in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
| Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | 8 | ||
| Nuclear | 9 | ||
| Hydroelectric | 19 | ||
| Geothermal | 30 | ||
| Solar | 35 | ||
| Biofuels | 182 | ||
| Gas | 389 | ||
| Coal | 651 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.