Nvidia P104-100 Profitability


0.0%
Profitability
Period | /Day | /Month |
---|---|---|
Income | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.20 | $6.00 |
Profitability | -$0.20 | -$6.00 |
Algorithms
Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
---|---|---|
EquihashZEL
0Hh - 0.0W |
NaN j/h |
$0.00
/day
|
Zhash
49Hh - 100.0W |
0.49 j/h |
-$0.10
/day
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh - 92.0W |
0.04 j/h |
-$0.11
/day
|
Autolykos2
63.239436Mh - 100.0W |
0.63 j/h |
-$0.13
/day
|
KAWPOW
15.09662Mh - 150.0W |
0.10 j/h |
-$0.15
/day
|
Octopus
7.050622Mh - 99.0W |
0.07 j/h |
-$0.19
/day
|
Lyra2REv2
34.031495Mh - 83.0W |
2.44 j/Mh |
-$0.20
/day
|
BeamHashIII
17Hh - 144.0W |
0.12 j/h |
-$0.21
/day
|
CryptoNightR
722Hh - 101.0W |
0.14 j/Hh |
-$0.21
/day
|
Keccak
649.890275Mh - 114.0W |
5.70 j/h |
-$0.23
/day
|
RandomX
394Hh - 102.0W |
j/Mh |
-$0.23
/day
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh - 102.0W |
Inf j/Hh |
-$0.24
/day
|
Etchash
32.507435Mh - 122.0W |
0.27 j/h |
-$0.24
/day
|
Ethash
32.507435Mh - 122.0W |
3.75 j/Mh |
-$0.26
/day
|
Blake (2s)
3.306488345Gh - 118.0W |
0.03 j/h |
-$0.28
/day
|
X13
6.116274Mh - 119.0W |
0.05 j/h |
-$0.29
/day
|
X16R
20.709038Mh - 124.0W |
0.17 j/h |
-$0.30
/day
|
X16Rv2
20.120542Mh - 124.0W |
0.16 j/h |
-$0.30
/day
|
Lyra2z
2.049046Mh - 125.0W |
0.02 j/h |
-$0.30
/day
|
Equihash
445Hh - 128.0W |
j/Kh |
-$0.31
/day
|
NeoScrypt
807.951Kh - 175.0W |
4.62 j/h |
-$0.35
/day
|
Eaglesong
606.922Mh - 149.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.36
/day
|
Description
Model Nvidia P104-100 from Nvidia mining algorithm Lyra2REv2 with a maximum hashrate of 34.031495M for a power consumption of 92w.
Specification
Base Clock | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1733 MHz |
GPU Power | 135 W |
Max Memory Bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s |
Max Memory Size | 4 GB |
Memory Type | GDDR5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 |
Release date | December 2017 |
Mining pools
Pool | Start Mining |
---|---|
Nicehash | nicehash.com |
Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
zpool | zpool.ca |
XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
Zergpool | zergpool.com |
XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia P104-100 in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
---|---|---|---|
Wind | 8 | ||
Nuclear | 9 | ||
Hydroelectric | 19 | ||
Geothermal | 30 | ||
Solar | 35 | ||
Biofuels | 182 | ||
Gas | 389 | ||
Coal | 651 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.