LP Agent
Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB — Simulateur de rentabilité
Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB rapporte jusqu'à $10.06 par jour, meilleur en minant Lyra2REv3 à 67.394605 Mh/s. Également disponible : vente de hashpower Ethash ($-0.34/jour). Consomme 182 W au mur — à $0.10/kWh, rentable aux tarifs actuels.
Touchez pour changer · 7 sections Simulateur de rentabilité 4/7
Ce GPU a ? Go de VRAM — la plupart des marchés d'IA exigent au moins 12 Go.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $10.50 | $315.13 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.44 | $13.20 |
| Profit | $10.06 | $301.93 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
Cette page a-t-elle été utile ?
Merci pour le retour !
Autre chose à partager ? Le formulaire est ouvert ci-dessous.
Historique des paiements de minage
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $10.50 | $315.00 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.44 | $13.20 |
| Profit | $10.06 | $301.80 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
LYR
Lyra2REv3
★ Meilleur
67.394605 Mh/s · 182.0 W
|
$10.06 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
55 Hh/s · 144.0 W
|
$-0.12 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
1.250235 Mh/s · 42.0 W
|
$-0.16 |
|
ETC
Etchash
44.84675 Mh/s · 138.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
5 Hh/s · 172.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
52.471145 Mh/s · 145.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
HAN
Handshake
328.7625 Mh/s · 164.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
KEC
Keccak
827.619405 Mh/s · 139.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
4.358304 Mh/s · 102.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
NIS
NIST5
42.7198 Mh/s · 178.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
X16
X16R
32.377047 Mh/s · 179.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
30.355637 Mh/s · 182.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
0 Hh/s · 123.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
0 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
3 Hh/s · 96.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CRY
CryptoNightR
1.111 Kh/s · 91.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
2 Hh/s · 126.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
BEA
BeamHashII
17 Hh/s · 81.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
CuckooBFC
197 Hh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroom29
3 Hh/s · 142.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
ETH
Ethash
44.84675 Mh/s · 138.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
32 Hh/s · 142.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
293.25 Hh/s · 146.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.967114012 Gh/s · 123.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
EAG
Eaglesong
841.8925 Mh/s · 163.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
67.394605Mh · 182.0W
|
$10.50 | $0.44 | $10.06 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
55Hh · 144.0W
|
$0.32 | $0.35 | $-0.03 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
1.250235Mh · 42.0W
|
$0.28 | $0.10 | $0.18 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
44.84675Mh · 138.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.33 | $-0.30 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
5Hh · 172.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.41 | $-0.40 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
52.471145Mh · 145.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
328.7625Mh · 164.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.343Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Cortex
0Hh · 135.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
45Hh · 171.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
53Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
32Hh · 142.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
293Hh · 146.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
6.673025Mh · 146.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
66.107162Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
827.619405Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
826.965862Mh · 138.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
4.358304Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
42.7198Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
43.361122Mh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
63.294589Mh · 163.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
4.100728Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
37.480735Mh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
109.509567Mh · 149.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
44.959397Mh · 137.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
X15
6.312527Mh · 144.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
32.377047Mh · 179.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
36.648025Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
30.355637Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
27.457405Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
X17
25.149077Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
5.96567Mh · 161.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
0Hh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X22i
16.219449Mh · 173.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
20.18979Mh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
3Hh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
129.935Kh · 197.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
2.873Kh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.831Kh · 161.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHaven
1.538Kh · 82.0W
|
— | $0.20 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavy
1.524Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightLiteV7
3.259Kh · 83.0W
|
— | $0.20 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
1.111Kh · 91.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightSaber
1.335Kh · 93.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightV7
1.627Kh · 84.0W
|
— | $0.20 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(96,5)
27.699Kh · 152.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
8.924682Mh · 135.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightConceal
3.046Kh · 84.0W
|
— | $0.20 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(150,5)
27Hh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavyX
538Hh · 81.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightTurtle
12.192Kh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29S
7Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
2Hh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-dyn
227.457Kh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d250
937.83Kh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
17Hh · 81.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
31.046Kh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
5.906729Mh · 152.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightZLS
2.051Kh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
X16RTVEIL
36.553345Mh · 188.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
CuckooBFC
197Hh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
3Hh · 142.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
44.84675Mh · 138.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
32Hh · 142.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
293.25Hh · 146.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.967114012Gh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s-Kadena)
863.82Mh · 145.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
CKB
Nervos
|
Eaglesong
841.8925Mh · 163.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
52.59Kh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
29.392125Mh · 179.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
C11
38.033973Mh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
Historique des paiements hashmarket
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.10 | $3.02 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.44 | $13.20 |
| Profit | $-0.34 | $-10.18 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
MRR
· Etchash
· $-0.30/day
MRR
Visiter on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 17.3 kg |
| Nuclear | 18.87 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 37.74 kg |
| Geothermal | 59.75 kg |
| Solar | 70.76 kg |
| Biofuels | 361.67 kg |
| Gas | 770.52 kg |
| Coal | 1,289.43 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 747 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,289 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 38 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Touchez pour changer · 7 sections Simulateur de rentabilité 4/7
Ce GPU a ? Go de VRAM — la plupart des marchés d'IA exigent au moins 12 Go.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $10.50 | $315.13 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.44 | $13.20 |
| Profit | $10.06 | $301.93 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
Historique des paiements de minage
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $10.50 | $315.00 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.44 | $13.20 |
| Profit | $10.06 | $301.80 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
LYR
Lyra2REv3
★ Meilleur
67.394605 Mh/s · 182.0 W
|
$10.06 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
55 Hh/s · 144.0 W
|
$-0.12 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
1.250235 Mh/s · 42.0 W
|
$-0.16 |
|
ETC
Etchash
44.84675 Mh/s · 138.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
5 Hh/s · 172.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
52.471145 Mh/s · 145.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
HAN
Handshake
328.7625 Mh/s · 164.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
KEC
Keccak
827.619405 Mh/s · 139.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
4.358304 Mh/s · 102.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
NIS
NIST5
42.7198 Mh/s · 178.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
X16
X16R
32.377047 Mh/s · 179.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
30.355637 Mh/s · 182.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
0 Hh/s · 123.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
0 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
3 Hh/s · 96.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CRY
CryptoNightR
1.111 Kh/s · 91.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
2 Hh/s · 126.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
BEA
BeamHashII
17 Hh/s · 81.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
CuckooBFC
197 Hh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroom29
3 Hh/s · 142.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
ETH
Ethash
44.84675 Mh/s · 138.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
32 Hh/s · 142.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
293.25 Hh/s · 146.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.967114012 Gh/s · 123.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
|
EAG
Eaglesong
841.8925 Mh/s · 163.0 W
|
$-0.44 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
67.394605Mh · 182.0W
|
$10.50 | $0.44 | $10.06 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
55Hh · 144.0W
|
$0.32 | $0.35 | $-0.03 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
1.250235Mh · 42.0W
|
$0.28 | $0.10 | $0.18 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
44.84675Mh · 138.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.33 | $-0.30 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
5Hh · 172.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.41 | $-0.40 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
52.471145Mh · 145.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
328.7625Mh · 164.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.343Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Cortex
0Hh · 135.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
45Hh · 171.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
53Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
32Hh · 142.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
293Hh · 146.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
6.673025Mh · 146.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
66.107162Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
827.619405Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
826.965862Mh · 138.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
4.358304Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
42.7198Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
43.361122Mh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
63.294589Mh · 163.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
4.100728Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
37.480735Mh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
109.509567Mh · 149.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
44.959397Mh · 137.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
X15
6.312527Mh · 144.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
32.377047Mh · 179.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
36.648025Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
30.355637Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
27.457405Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
X17
25.149077Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
5.96567Mh · 161.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
0Hh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X22i
16.219449Mh · 173.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
20.18979Mh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
3Hh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
129.935Kh · 197.0W
|
— | $0.47 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
2.873Kh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.831Kh · 161.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHaven
1.538Kh · 82.0W
|
— | $0.20 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavy
1.524Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightLiteV7
3.259Kh · 83.0W
|
— | $0.20 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
1.111Kh · 91.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightSaber
1.335Kh · 93.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightV7
1.627Kh · 84.0W
|
— | $0.20 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(96,5)
27.699Kh · 152.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
8.924682Mh · 135.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightConceal
3.046Kh · 84.0W
|
— | $0.20 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(150,5)
27Hh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavyX
538Hh · 81.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightTurtle
12.192Kh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29S
7Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
2Hh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-dyn
227.457Kh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d250
937.83Kh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
17Hh · 81.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
31.046Kh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
5.906729Mh · 152.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightZLS
2.051Kh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
X16RTVEIL
36.553345Mh · 188.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
CuckooBFC
197Hh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
3Hh · 142.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
44.84675Mh · 138.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
32Hh · 142.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
293.25Hh · 146.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.967114012Gh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s-Kadena)
863.82Mh · 145.0W
|
— | $0.35 | — |
CKB
Nervos
|
Eaglesong
841.8925Mh · 163.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
52.59Kh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
29.392125Mh · 179.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
C11
38.033973Mh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
Historique des paiements hashmarket
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.10 | $3.02 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.44 | $13.20 |
| Profit | $-0.34 | $-10.18 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
MRR
· Etchash
· $-0.30/day
MRR
Visiter on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 17.3 kg |
| Nuclear | 18.87 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 37.74 kg |
| Geothermal | 59.75 kg |
| Solar | 70.76 kg |
| Biofuels | 361.67 kg |
| Gas | 770.52 kg |
| Coal | 1,289.43 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 747 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia Tesla P100-PCIE-16GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,289 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 38 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.