LP Agent
AMD RX 590 8GB
AMD RX 590 8GB loses $0.25 a day mining KAWPOW at 11.34 Mh/s and pulling 125.0 W from the wall. That's after subtracting power at $0.1/kWh — not quite breaking even at today's rates.
Daily projection
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.71 | $21.44 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.30 | $9.00 |
| Profit | $0.41 | $12.44 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
14Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
11.34Mh · 125.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.30 | $-0.25 |
|
—
|
Ethash
30.83Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
12Hh · 125.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.30 | $-0.26 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
2.8Mh · 125.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.30 | $-0.26 |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
1Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
840Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
17.5Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.22 | $-0.19 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
31Mh · 125.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.30 | $-0.28 |
|
—
|
X16R
12Mh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
116Mh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
12Mh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
CKB
Nervos
|
Eaglesong
401Mh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
2Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
18Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Polaris
- Model
- AMD RX 590 8GB
- Power
- 130 W
- Process
- 14 nm
- Release
- 2016
- Release year
- 2016
- TDP
- 130 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- AMD
| Market | Algorithm | Profit /day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000078000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.41
★
$0.71 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.28
★
$0.58 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000079528 BTC/M/d
|
$0.43
$0.73 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000058000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
★
$0.53 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.26
★
$0.56 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000058400 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
$0.54 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002202 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.03 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006948 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.09 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$0.14
★
$0.44 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011553 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
$0.15 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.05 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
8% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.09 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.16 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012489 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.11 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003225 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.01 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.02 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.16
★
$0.14 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014881 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.03 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
★
$0.05 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004421 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.26
★
$0.04 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000514 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.01 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
3% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
★
$0.03 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001580 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.26
★
$0.04 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001467 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.03 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| Eaglesong | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000077 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.30
$0.00 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000200 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.00 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000192 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.00 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000230 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.30
$0.00 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
ROI calculator for AMD RX 590 8GB
Model payback, electricity, and first-year return for this rig.
The line crosses $0 on the day you break even. Everything above is pure profit.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Yearly emissions by energy source
Based on the rig's annual power draw and the carbon intensity of common grid mixes.
| Energy source | CO₂e / yr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 11.88 kg |
| Nuclear | 12.96 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 25.92 kg |
| Geothermal | 41.04 kg |
| Solar | 48.6 kg |
| Biofuels | 248.4 kg |
| Gas | 529.2 kg |
| Coal | 885.6 kg |
Estimates only — actual emissions vary by hardware, cooling, and grid mix.
What does that actually mean?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 590 8GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 513 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Where you plug in matters
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 590 8GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 886 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 26 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
How to reduce this rig's footprint
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Frequently asked questions
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Daily projection
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.71 | $21.44 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.30 | $9.00 |
| Profit | $0.41 | $12.44 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
14Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
11.34Mh · 125.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.30 | $-0.25 |
|
—
|
Ethash
30.83Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
12Hh · 125.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.30 | $-0.26 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
2.8Mh · 125.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.30 | $-0.26 |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
1Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
840Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
17.5Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.22 | $-0.19 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
31Mh · 125.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.30 | $-0.28 |
|
—
|
X16R
12Mh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
116Mh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
12Mh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
CKB
Nervos
|
Eaglesong
401Mh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
2Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
18Hh · 125.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
- Architecture
- Polaris
- Model
- AMD RX 590 8GB
- Power
- 130 W
- Process
- 14 nm
- Release
- 2016
- Release year
- 2016
- TDP
- 130 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- AMD
| Market | Algorithm | Profit /day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000078000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.41
★
$0.71 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.28
★
$0.58 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000079528 BTC/M/d
|
$0.43
$0.73 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000058000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
★
$0.53 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.26
★
$0.56 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000058400 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
$0.54 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002202 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.03 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006948 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.09 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$0.14
★
$0.44 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011553 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
$0.15 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.05 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
8% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.09 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.16 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012489 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.11 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003225 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.01 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.02 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.16
★
$0.14 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014881 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.03 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
★
$0.05 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004421 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.26
★
$0.04 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000514 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.01 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
3% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
★
$0.03 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001580 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.26
★
$0.04 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001467 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.03 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| Eaglesong | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000077 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.30
$0.00 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000200 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.00 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000192 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.00 income · $0.30 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000230 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.30
$0.00 income · $0.30 cost
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
ROI calculator for AMD RX 590 8GB
Model payback, electricity, and first-year return for this rig.
The line crosses $0 on the day you break even. Everything above is pure profit.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Yearly emissions by energy source
Based on the rig's annual power draw and the carbon intensity of common grid mixes.
| Energy source | CO₂e / yr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 11.88 kg |
| Nuclear | 12.96 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 25.92 kg |
| Geothermal | 41.04 kg |
| Solar | 48.6 kg |
| Biofuels | 248.4 kg |
| Gas | 529.2 kg |
| Coal | 885.6 kg |
Estimates only — actual emissions vary by hardware, cooling, and grid mix.
What does that actually mean?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 590 8GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 513 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Where you plug in matters
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 590 8GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 886 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 26 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
How to reduce this rig's footprint
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Frequently asked questions
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.