LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti — Profitability Simulator
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti makes up to $2.09 a day, best on AI rental at $0.11/h across 1 offer. Also available: mining Octopus at 88 Mh/s ($0.93/day) and KAWPOW hashpower sale ($-0.02/day). Pulling 180 W from the wall — at $0.10/kWh, profitable at today's rates.
Tap to switch · 8 sections Profitability Simulator 5/8
Daily projection
Daily winners across all income streams — averaged from your rig's recorded history at $0.1/kWh
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $2.52 | $75.67 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| Profit | $2.09 | $62.77 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
Was this page helpful?
Thanks for the feedback!
Anything else worth knowing? The form is open below.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
Mining payout history
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $1.34 | $40.20 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| Profit | $0.91 | $27.30 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
| Algorithm | Net / day |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ Best
88 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$0.91 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
180 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$0.62 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
100 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$0.14 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
43 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.26 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
195 Mh/s · 100.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
ETC
Etchash
88 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
FIS
FishHash
69 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
QHA
Qhash
305 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
BLA
Blake3
3.3 Gh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
ETH
Ethash
88 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
64 Kh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
88Mh · 180.0W
|
$1.34 | $0.43 | $0.91 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
180Mh · 200.0W
|
$1.05 | $0.48 | $0.57 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
100Hh · 170.0W
|
$0.57 | $0.41 | $0.16 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
43Mh · 190.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.46 | $-0.29 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
195Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.24 | $-0.14 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
88Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.36 | $-0.31 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
69Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
305Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
46Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.3Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
88Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
64Kh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
Net rental income history
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $2.52 | $75.60 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| Profit | $2.09 | $62.70 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
| Provider | GPU | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 5070 Ti
$0.124/h ·
1 offer
|
$2.52
|
$0.43 |
$2.09
★
Visit →
|
Revenue flow How Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti earns renting on the AI GPU marketplace how we got $2.09/day · ▾
Hashmarket payout history
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.41 | $12.22 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| Profit | $-0.02 | $-0.68 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.24/day
Visit on MRR →
MRR
Visit on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
ROI calculator for Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Model payback, electricity, and first-year return for this rig.
The line crosses $0 on the day you break even. Everything above is pure profit.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Yearly emissions by energy source
Based on the rig's annual power draw and the carbon intensity of common grid mixes.
| Energy source | CO₂e / yr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 17.11 kg |
| Nuclear | 18.66 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 37.32 kg |
| Geothermal | 59.1 kg |
| Solar | 69.98 kg |
| Biofuels | 357.7 kg |
| Gas | 762.05 kg |
| Coal | 1,275.26 kg |
Estimates only — actual emissions vary by hardware, cooling, and grid mix.
What does that actually mean?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 739 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Where you plug in matters
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,275 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 37 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
How to reduce this rig's footprint
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Frequently asked questions
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Tap to switch · 8 sections Profitability Simulator 5/8
Daily projection
Daily winners across all income streams — averaged from your rig's recorded history at $0.1/kWh
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $2.52 | $75.67 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| Profit | $2.09 | $62.77 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
Mining payout history
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $1.34 | $40.20 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| Profit | $0.91 | $27.30 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
| Algorithm | Net / day |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ Best
88 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$0.91 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
180 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$0.62 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
100 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$0.14 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
43 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.26 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
195 Mh/s · 100.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
ETC
Etchash
88 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
FIS
FishHash
69 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
QHA
Qhash
305 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
BLA
Blake3
3.3 Gh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
ETH
Ethash
88 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
64 Kh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.43 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
88Mh · 180.0W
|
$1.34 | $0.43 | $0.91 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
180Mh · 200.0W
|
$1.05 | $0.48 | $0.57 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
100Hh · 170.0W
|
$0.57 | $0.41 | $0.16 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
43Mh · 190.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.46 | $-0.29 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
195Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.24 | $-0.14 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
88Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.36 | $-0.31 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
69Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
305Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
46Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.3Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
88Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
64Kh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
Net rental income history
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $2.52 | $75.60 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| Profit | $2.09 | $62.70 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
| Provider | GPU | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 5070 Ti
$0.124/h ·
1 offer
|
$2.52
|
$0.43 |
$2.09
★
Visit →
|
Revenue flow How Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti earns renting on the AI GPU marketplace how we got $2.09/day · ▾
Hashmarket payout history
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.41 | $12.22 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.43 | $12.90 |
| Profit | $-0.02 | $-0.68 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.24/day
Visit on MRR →
MRR
Visit on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
ROI calculator for Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Model payback, electricity, and first-year return for this rig.
The line crosses $0 on the day you break even. Everything above is pure profit.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Yearly emissions by energy source
Based on the rig's annual power draw and the carbon intensity of common grid mixes.
| Energy source | CO₂e / yr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 17.11 kg |
| Nuclear | 18.66 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 37.32 kg |
| Geothermal | 59.1 kg |
| Solar | 69.98 kg |
| Biofuels | 357.7 kg |
| Gas | 762.05 kg |
| Coal | 1,275.26 kg |
Estimates only — actual emissions vary by hardware, cooling, and grid mix.
What does that actually mean?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 739 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Where you plug in matters
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,275 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 37 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
How to reduce this rig's footprint
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Frequently asked questions
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.