LP Agent
Auto-pilot your LP positions and access institutional-grade on-chain data across Meteora, Orca & Uniswap.
Try LP Agent now →
●
Goldshell
·
ASIC
·
Handshake
Goldshell HS1
Profit /day
$-0.10
Income /day
$0.04
8.6 HNS/day
Cost $0.14 @ $0.1/kWh
Hashrate
50Gh/s
Handshake
Power · Efficiency
57.0W
1.14 j/Gh
Goldshell HS1 loses $0.10 a day mining Handshake at 50 Gh/s, pulling 57 W from the wall. That's after subtracting power at $0.10/kWh — not quite breaking even at today's rates.
●
4 minutes ago
Similar miners ↓
Tap to switch · 6 sections Overview 1/6
Today's best income
Crypto Mining · $-0.10/day net
$
Not available
AI Rental
GPU marketplace
ASICs run a single hash function — they don't run AI workloads. Only general-purpose GPUs can be rented for AI.
⛏
★ Winner
Crypto Mining
Direct chain mining
$-0.10
//Day net
Income $0.04 · on Handshake
See details →
⇄
Not available
Market Hashrate
Sell raw hashpower
No active marketplace lists hashpower for this rig at consumer scale.
Profitability over time · best of rig
Daily projection
Daily winners across all income streams — averaged from your rig's recorded history at $0.1/kWh
Loading...
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.04 | $1.35 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.14 | $4.20 |
| Profit | $-0.10 | $-2.85 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
Similar rigs
More Goldshell miners
Profit vs cost
cost 350.0%
Full specifications
Goldshell HS1
· Goldshell
· Handshake
Power draw
57 W
Hashrate
50Gh/s
on Handshake
Best efficiency
1.14 J/G
on Handshake
Algos supported
1
Device type
ASIC
Manufacturer
Goldshell
Cost / day
$0.14
at $0.1/kWh
LP Agent
Best mining algorithm · 1 supported · 1 with live coin price
Handshake · $-0.10/day net
Profitability over time
Mining payout history
Loading...
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.04 | $1.20 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.14 | $4.20 |
| Profit | $-0.10 | $-3.00 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
All mineable algorithms
1 algorithms
| Algorithm | Net / day |
|---|---|
|
HAN
Handshake
★ Best
50 Gh/s · 57.0 W
|
$-0.10 |
Mineable coins
1 algo
| Coin | Algorithm | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
50Gh · 57.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.14 | $-0.10 |
Where to mine
Live stats where available
Similar rigs · best mining
More Goldshell miners
Today's algo & coin
Handshake
HNS · Handshake
Network hashrate
1.67 PH/s
Your network share
0.002986%
See full coin page →
Try your own hashrate
Gh/s
W
Income/d
$0.00
Cost/d
$0.00
Profit/d
$0.00
Profitability Simulator · Handshake
Network hashrate
1.67 PH/s
This rig
50 Gh/s
Network ≈
33,491 rigs
Your share · 1 rig
—
Scenario · add 1 of this rig
vs Handshake network: 1.67 PH/s
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Profit vs quantity added
Adjust the Quantity slider to see how adding more of this rig affects earnings.
Profit vs cost
cost 350.0%
Price vs Profitability · Handshake
Handshake price (current)
$0.0052
Rev /day (today)
$0.04
Cost /day @ $0.1/kWh
$0.14
Break-even floor
—
—
-
%
+
%
Profit vs price
Price sensitivity
Center row is today's price. Rows above model higher prices, rows below model lower. The first row in red marks the break-even floor.
Profit vs cost
cost 350.0%
ROI calculator
ROI calculator for Goldshell HS1
Model payback, electricity, and first-year return for this rig.
Hardware cost
$5,000
Electricity rate
$0.10/kWh
Runtime per day
24
Pool fee
2.0%
Difficulty growth /yr
+0%
Net profit /day
$0.00
after electricity & fees
Payback period
—
—
First-year return
$0
—
Projected cumulative profit
The line crosses $0 on the day you break even. Everything above is pure profit.
Monthly P&L · 3-year horizon
Capital cost is booked in month 1. Cumulative columns include the rig purchase, so Net goes positive at true breakeven.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Profit vs cost
cost 350.0%
Carbon footprint
Yearly emissions by energy source
Based on the rig's annual power draw and the carbon intensity of common grid mixes.
| Energy source | CO₂e / yr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 5.42 kg |
| Nuclear | 5.91 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 11.82 kg |
| Geothermal | 18.71 kg |
| Solar | 22.16 kg |
| Biofuels | 113.27 kg |
| Gas | 241.32 kg |
| Coal | 403.83 kg |
Estimates only — actual emissions vary by hardware, cooling, and grid mix.
What does that actually mean?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Goldshell HS1 running 24/7 for a year releases about 234 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Driving a gas car
579 mi
EPA average passenger car emissions ≈ 404 g CO₂/mile.
Trees to absorb it
10 trees
A mature tree absorbs roughly 22 kg CO₂ per year.
Household electricity
0.1 yrs
Equivalent to the yearly emissions of an average household's electricity.
Where you plug in matters
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Goldshell HS1's annual footprint swings from roughly 404 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 12 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
How to reduce this rig's footprint
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Frequently asked questions
How do you calculate these numbers?
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
Is crypto mining bad for the environment?
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
What about the Bitcoin network as a whole?
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Do pool fees or mining difficulty affect the footprint?
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Profit vs cost
cost 350.0%
Tap to switch · 6 sections Overview 1/6
Today's best income
Crypto Mining · $-0.10/day net
$
Not available
AI Rental
GPU marketplace
ASICs run a single hash function — they don't run AI workloads. Only general-purpose GPUs can be rented for AI.
⛏
★ Winner
Crypto Mining
Direct chain mining
$-0.10
//Day net
Income $0.04 · on Handshake
See details →
⇄
Not available
Market Hashrate
Sell raw hashpower
No active marketplace lists hashpower for this rig at consumer scale.
Profitability over time · best of rig
Daily projection
Daily winners across all income streams — averaged from your rig's recorded history at $0.1/kWh
Loading...
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.04 | $1.35 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.14 | $4.20 |
| Profit | $-0.10 | $-2.85 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
Profit vs cost
cost 350.0%
Full specifications
Goldshell HS1
· Goldshell
· Handshake
Power draw
57 W
Hashrate
50Gh/s
on Handshake
Best efficiency
1.14 J/G
on Handshake
Algos supported
1
Device type
ASIC
Manufacturer
Goldshell
Cost / day
$0.14
at $0.1/kWh
Similar rigs
More Goldshell miners
Best mining algorithm · 1 supported · 1 with live coin price
Handshake · $-0.10/day net
Profitability over time
Mining payout history
Loading...
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.04 | $1.20 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.14 | $4.20 |
| Profit | $-0.10 | $-3.00 |
Internal consensus blend — derived from external sources, not a raw quote from any single market.
All mineable algorithms
1 algorithms
| Algorithm | Net / day |
|---|---|
|
HAN
Handshake
★ Best
50 Gh/s · 57.0 W
|
$-0.10 |
Mineable coins
1 algo
| Coin | Algorithm | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
50Gh · 57.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.14 | $-0.10 |
Where to mine
Live stats where available
Similar rigs · best mining
More Goldshell miners
Today's algo & coin
Handshake
HNS · Handshake
Network hashrate
1.67 PH/s
Your network share
0.002986%
See full coin page →
Try your own hashrate
Gh/s
W
Income/d
$0.00
Cost/d
$0.00
Profit/d
$0.00
Profitability Simulator · Handshake
Network hashrate
1.67 PH/s
This rig
50 Gh/s
Network ≈
33,491 rigs
Your share · 1 rig
—
Scenario · add 1 of this rig
vs Handshake network: 1.67 PH/s
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Profit vs quantity added
Adjust the Quantity slider to see how adding more of this rig affects earnings.
Price vs Profitability · Handshake
Handshake price (current)
$0.0052
Rev /day (today)
$0.04
Cost /day @ $0.1/kWh
$0.14
Break-even floor
—
—
-
%
+
%
Profit vs price
Price sensitivity
Center row is today's price. Rows above model higher prices, rows below model lower. The first row in red marks the break-even floor.
ROI calculator
ROI calculator for Goldshell HS1
Model payback, electricity, and first-year return for this rig.
Hardware cost
$5,000
Electricity rate
$0.10/kWh
Runtime per day
24
Pool fee
2.0%
Difficulty growth /yr
+0%
Net profit /day
$0.00
after electricity & fees
Payback period
—
—
First-year return
$0
—
Projected cumulative profit
The line crosses $0 on the day you break even. Everything above is pure profit.
Monthly P&L · 3-year horizon
Capital cost is booked in month 1. Cumulative columns include the rig purchase, so Net goes positive at true breakeven.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Carbon footprint
Yearly emissions by energy source
Based on the rig's annual power draw and the carbon intensity of common grid mixes.
| Energy source | CO₂e / yr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 5.42 kg |
| Nuclear | 5.91 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 11.82 kg |
| Geothermal | 18.71 kg |
| Solar | 22.16 kg |
| Biofuels | 113.27 kg |
| Gas | 241.32 kg |
| Coal | 403.83 kg |
Estimates only — actual emissions vary by hardware, cooling, and grid mix.
What does that actually mean?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Goldshell HS1 running 24/7 for a year releases about 234 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Driving a gas car
579 mi
EPA average passenger car emissions ≈ 404 g CO₂/mile.
Trees to absorb it
10 trees
A mature tree absorbs roughly 22 kg CO₂ per year.
Household electricity
0.1 yrs
Equivalent to the yearly emissions of an average household's electricity.
Where you plug in matters
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Goldshell HS1's annual footprint swings from roughly 404 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 12 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
How to reduce this rig's footprint
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Frequently asked questions
How do you calculate these numbers?
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
Is crypto mining bad for the environment?
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
What about the Bitcoin network as a whole?
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Do pool fees or mining difficulty affect the footprint?
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Frequently asked
About the Goldshell HS1
Is the Goldshell HS1 profitable?
As of May 2026, the Goldshell HS1 earns $-0.10/day mining Handshake at an electricity cost of $0.1/kWh. At this electricity rate it is not profitable.
How much power does the Goldshell HS1 use?
The Goldshell HS1 consumes 57W of power. At $0.1/kWh, that costs approximately $0.14/day in electricity.
Can the Goldshell HS1 earn from AI rental?
No. The Goldshell HS1 is a mining ASIC — it has no general-purpose compute cores and cannot run AI workloads. AI rental is a GPU-only income mode.
What crypto algorithms can the Goldshell HS1 mine?
The Goldshell HS1 can mine 1 algorithm(s); Handshake is its most profitable, generating $0.04/day in direct mining revenue before electricity costs. Pool-based mining is the traditional approach — you point the rig at a mining pool and receive payouts in the native coin.
Can the Goldshell HS1 sell hashrate on NiceHash?
Yes. NiceHash and similar hashrate marketplaces (Mining Rig Rentals, etc.) let the Goldshell HS1 sell its Handshake hashpower directly — buyers rent the compute, you receive BTC per hash delivered. It is similar to mining, but removes coin-price risk since you are paid in BTC on NiceHash's rate.