Nvidia GTX 1660 Super Profitability


1673.59%
Profitability
Period | /Day | /Month |
---|---|---|
Income | $0.01 | $0.30 |
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.10 | $3.00 |
Profitability | -$0.09 | -$2.70 |
Algorithms
Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
---|---|---|
KAWPOW
11.52Mh - 86.0W |
0.13 j/h |
-$0.05
/day
|
Octopus
21.148Mh - 89.0W |
0.24 j/h |
-$0.06
/day
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh - 78.0W |
0.05 j/h |
-$0.08
/day
|
NeoScrypt
743.52Kh - 71.0W |
10.47 j/h |
-$0.10
/day
|
Autolykos2
52.66Mh - 85.0W |
0.62 j/h |
-$0.11
/day
|
Zhash
30Hh - 84.0W |
0.36 j/h |
-$0.11
/day
|
RandomX
476Hh - 72.0W |
j/Mh |
-$0.16
/day
|
Keccak
578.46213Mh - 85.0W |
6.81 j/h |
-$0.16
/day
|
Lyra2z
1.40497Mh - 71.0W |
0.02 j/h |
-$0.17
/day
|
BeamHashIII
13Hh - 117.0W |
0.11 j/h |
-$0.17
/day
|
Etchash
31.606Mh - 90.0W |
0.35 j/h |
-$0.18
/day
|
CryptoNightR
540Hh - 81.0W |
0.15 j/Hh |
-$0.17
/day
|
VerusHash
3.952888Mh - 84.0W |
0.05 j/h |
-$0.17
/day
|
Blake (2s)
3.260464513Gh - 78.0W |
0.04 j/h |
-$0.19
/day
|
Eaglesong
504.15Mh - 79.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.19
/day
|
Ethash
31.606Mh - 90.0W |
2.85 j/Mh |
-$0.19
/day
|
NexaPoW
14.85718Mh - 95.0W |
6.39 j/Mh |
-$0.19
/day
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh - 82.0W |
Inf j/Hh |
-$0.20
/day
|
X16Rv2
15.49881Mh - 84.0W |
0.18 j/h |
-$0.20
/day
|
Lyra2REv2
36.237844Mh - 84.0W |
2.32 j/Mh |
-$0.20
/day
|
KHeavyHash
258.060652Mh - 98.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.24
/day
|
X16R
7.21481Mh - 107.0W |
0.07 j/h |
-$0.26
/day
|
Description
Model Nvidia GTX 1660 Super from Nvidia mining algorithm RandomX with a maximum hashrate of 476H for a power consumption of 78w.
Specification
Base Clock | 1530 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1785 MHz |
GPU Power | 125 W |
Max Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
Max Memory Size | 6 GB |
Memory Type | GDDR6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 |
Mining pools
Pool | Start Mining |
---|---|
Nicehash | nicehash.com |
Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
zpool | zpool.ca |
XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
Zergpool | zergpool.com |
XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia GTX 1660 Super in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
---|---|---|---|
Wind | 7 | ||
Nuclear | 8 | ||
Hydroelectric | 16 | ||
Geothermal | 25 | ||
Solar | 30 | ||
Biofuels | 154 | ||
Gas | 329 | ||
Coal | 551 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.