Nvidia RTX 2070 Super
Model Nvidia RTX 2070 Super from Nvidia mining algorithm Octopus with a maximum hashrate of 46.34Mh for a power consumption of 54w.
Profitability
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $0.29 | $8.70 |
|
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.10 | $3.00 |
| Profitability | $0.19 | $5.70 |
Algorithms
| Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
|---|---|---|
|
Octopus
46.34Mh - 162.0W |
0.29J | -$0.10 |
|
RandomX
926h - 54.0W |
17.15J | -$0.11 |
|
Zhash
65h - 152.0W |
0.43J | -$0.15 |
|
X16R
13.17692Mh - 72.0W |
0.18J | -$0.17 |
|
KHeavyHash
318.300585Mh - 79.0W |
4.03J | -$0.19 |
|
KAWPOW
22.60247Mh - 208.0W |
0.11J | -$0.19 |
|
BeamHashIII
26h - 186.0W |
0.14J | -$0.21 |
|
Autolykos2
72.012859Mh - 147.0W |
0.49J | -$0.22 |
|
Eaglesong
851.451Mh - 92.0W |
9.25J | -$0.22 |
|
Lyra2z
2.60822Mh - 92.0W |
0.03J | -$0.22 |
|
CryptoNightR
803h - 114.0W |
7.04J | -$0.27 |
|
X16Rv2
27.63837Mh - 119.0W |
0.23J | -$0.29 |
|
Etchash
36.83211Mh - 160.0W |
0.23J | -$0.31 |
|
CuckooCycle
6h - 180.0W |
0.03J | -$0.32 |
|
Blake (2s)
5.111007116Gh - 137.0W |
0.04J | -$0.33 |
|
Ethash
37.201947Mh - 171.0W |
0.22J | -$0.35 |
|
Equihash
632h - 150.0W |
4.21J | -$0.35 |
|
NeoScrypt
1.3788Mh - 214.0W |
0.01J | -$0.35 |
|
Lyra2REv2
65.97376Mh - 152.0W |
0.43J | -$0.36 |
|
cuckAToo32
0h - 191.0W |
0.00J | -$0.46 |
|
Keccak
1.06804237Gh - 211.0W |
0.01J | -$0.51 |
Specification
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz |
| Core Clock | 1605 MHz |
| GPU Power | 215 W |
| Max Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 |
Mining pools for Nvidia RTX 2070 Super
| Pool | Start Mining |
|---|---|
| Nicehash | nicehash.com |
| Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
| zpool | zpool.ca |
| XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
| Zergpool | zergpool.com |
| XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
| Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia RTX 2070 Super in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
| Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wind | 5 | ||
| Nuclear | 5 | ||
| Hydroelectric | 11 | ||
| Geothermal | 17 | ||
| Solar | 20 | ||
| Biofuels | 107 | ||
| Gas | 228 | ||
| Coal | 382 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.