Nvidia RTX 2070 Super Profitability
645.22%
Profitability
Period | /Day | /Month |
---|---|---|
Income | $0.02 | $0.60 |
Cost $0.1/kWh |
$0.10 | $3.00 |
Profitability | -$0.08 | -$2.40 |
Algorithms
Algorithm | Efficiency | Profit |
---|---|---|
Octopus
46.34Mh - 162.0W |
0.29 j/h |
-$0.07
/day
|
RandomX
926Hh - 54.0W |
j/Mh |
-$0.11
/day
|
X16R
13.17692Mh - 72.0W |
0.18 j/h |
-$0.17
/day
|
Zhash
65Hh - 152.0W |
0.43 j/h |
-$0.17
/day
|
KHeavyHash
318.300585Mh - 79.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.19
/day
|
KAWPOW
22.60247Mh - 208.0W |
0.11 j/h |
-$0.19
/day
|
Eaglesong
851.451Mh - 92.0W |
j/Gh |
-$0.22
/day
|
Lyra2z
2.60822Mh - 92.0W |
0.03 j/h |
-$0.22
/day
|
BeamHashIII
26Hh - 186.0W |
0.14 j/h |
-$0.23
/day
|
Autolykos2
72.012859Mh - 147.0W |
0.49 j/h |
-$0.23
/day
|
CryptoNightR
803Hh - 114.0W |
0.14 j/Hh |
-$0.24
/day
|
CuckooCycle
6Hh - 180.0W |
0.03 j/h |
-$0.27
/day
|
X16Rv2
27.63837Mh - 119.0W |
0.23 j/h |
-$0.29
/day
|
Blake (2s)
5.111007116Gh - 137.0W |
0.04 j/h |
-$0.33
/day
|
Etchash
36.83211Mh - 160.0W |
0.23 j/h |
-$0.33
/day
|
Equihash
632Hh - 150.0W |
j/Kh |
-$0.35
/day
|
Lyra2REv2
65.97376Mh - 152.0W |
2.30 j/Mh |
-$0.36
/day
|
Ethash
37.201947Mh - 171.0W |
4.60 j/Mh |
-$0.38
/day
|
NeoScrypt
1.3788Mh - 214.0W |
0.01 j/h |
-$0.39
/day
|
Keccak
1.06804237Gh - 211.0W |
0.01 j/h |
-$0.45
/day
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh - 191.0W |
Inf j/Hh |
-$0.46
/day
|
Description
Model Nvidia RTX 2070 Super from Nvidia mining algorithm RandomX with a maximum hashrate of 926H for a power consumption of 54w.
Specification
Boost Clock | 1770 MHz |
Core Clock | 1605 MHz |
GPU Power | 215 W |
Max Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
Max Memory Size | 8 GB |
Memory Type | GDDR6 |
OpenGL | 4.5 |
Mining pools
Pool | Start Mining |
---|---|
Nicehash | nicehash.com |
Mining Rig Rental | miningrigrental.com |
zpool | zpool.ca |
XmrPool | xmrpool.net |
Zergpool | zergpool.com |
XmrPool Hub | xmrpoolhub.com |
Mining Pool Hub | miningpoolhub.com |
Carbon Footprint
Estimating the carbon footprint from the cryptocurrency mining operations of the Nvidia RTX 2070 Super in a year, based on energy consumption and various energy sources
Energy Source | Carbon Intensity (gCO2e/kWh) | Yearly Power Consumption (kWh) | Yearly Carbon Footprint (kgCO2e/year) |
---|---|---|---|
Wind | 5 | ||
Nuclear | 5 | ||
Hydroelectric | 11 | ||
Geothermal | 17 | ||
Solar | 20 | ||
Biofuels | 107 | ||
Gas | 228 | ||
Coal | 382 |
Warning: The numbers provided above are merely an estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from cryptocurrency mining. They are presented for informational purposes and should be seen as references only, not as an absolute exact figure. The actual carbon emissions can vary based on many different factors such as the approach, calculation methods, and specific parameters of each mining technology type. We recommend users to consider these figures as a small part of a larger environmental picture and the impact of cryptocurrency mining on it.