LP Agent
Nvidia Titan XP
Nvidia Titan XP 每天净亏 $0.47 挖 KAWPOW 算力 25.88 Mh/s 功耗 240.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情暂未回本。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.94 | $58.08 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $1.36 | $40.80 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
25.88Mh · 240.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.58 | $-0.47 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
1.791Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
25Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.58 | $-0.50 |
|
—
|
Ethash
49.023Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
77Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
49.023Mh · 252.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.60 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
Blake3
5.324Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
260Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
42.53Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
48.6Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
9Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
5Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
53Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Boost Clock
- 1582 MHz
- GPU Power
- 250 W
- Max Memory Bandwidth
- 547.7 GB/s
- Max Memory Size
- 12 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5X
- Model
- Nvidia Titan XP
- OpenGL
- 4.5
- Power
- 252 W
- Process
- 16 nm
- Release
- 2016
- Release year
- 2016
- TDP
- 252 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000059952 BTC/M/d
|
$1.36
★
$1.94 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$1.48
★
$2.06 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000081606 BTC/M/d
|
$2.06
$2.64 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061787 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.50
$0.08 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.44 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.43 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
$0.49 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.54
$0.04 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.17
★
$0.41 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.48 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.17
$0.41 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.47
$0.11 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.21 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.37 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.25 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.50
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.56
$0.02 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.52
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
$0.05 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.58
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia Titan XP 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 22.81 kg |
| Nuclear | 24.88 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 49.77 kg |
| Geothermal | 78.8 kg |
| Solar | 93.31 kg |
| Biofuels | 476.93 kg |
| Gas | 1,016.06 kg |
| Coal | 1,700.35 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia Titan XP running 24/7 for a year releases about 985 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia Titan XP's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,700 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 50 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.94 | $58.08 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $1.36 | $40.80 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
25.88Mh · 240.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.58 | $-0.47 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
1.791Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
25Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.58 | $-0.50 |
|
—
|
Ethash
49.023Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
77Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
49.023Mh · 252.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.60 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
Blake3
5.324Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
260Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
42.53Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
48.6Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
9Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
5Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
53Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Boost Clock
- 1582 MHz
- GPU Power
- 250 W
- Max Memory Bandwidth
- 547.7 GB/s
- Max Memory Size
- 12 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5X
- Model
- Nvidia Titan XP
- OpenGL
- 4.5
- Power
- 252 W
- Process
- 16 nm
- Release
- 2016
- Release year
- 2016
- TDP
- 252 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000059952 BTC/M/d
|
$1.36
★
$1.94 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$1.48
★
$2.06 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000081606 BTC/M/d
|
$2.06
$2.64 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061787 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.50
$0.08 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.44 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.43 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
$0.49 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.54
$0.04 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.17
★
$0.41 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.48 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.17
$0.41 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.47
$0.11 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.21 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.37 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.25 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.50
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.56
$0.02 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.52
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
$0.05 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.58
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia Titan XP 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 22.81 kg |
| Nuclear | 24.88 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 49.77 kg |
| Geothermal | 78.8 kg |
| Solar | 93.31 kg |
| Biofuels | 476.93 kg |
| Gas | 1,016.06 kg |
| Coal | 1,700.35 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia Titan XP running 24/7 for a year releases about 985 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia Titan XP's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,700 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 50 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.