LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 4070Ti
Nvidia RTX 4070Ti 每天净赚 最高 $0.36,最佳为挖 NeoScrypt 算力 2.8241 Mh/s。 也可用于:出售 NeoScrypt 算力($-0.01/天)。 功耗 297 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 7 个区块 概览 1/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.07 | $32.06 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.71 | $21.30 |
| 利润 | $0.36 | $10.76 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
此页面是否有帮助?
感谢您的反馈!
还有什么想告诉我们?表单已在下方打开。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.07 | $32.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.71 | $21.30 |
| 利润 | $0.36 | $10.80 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
★ 最佳
2.8241 Mh/s · 297.0 W
|
$0.36 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
149.714 Mh/s · 248.0 W
|
$0.22 |
|
OCT
Octopus
58.4362 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
29.7784 Mh/s · 225.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
108 Hh/s · 258.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
120.7661 Mh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.65 |
|
VER
VerusHash
17.7031 Mh/s · 195.0 W
|
$-0.65 |
|
ETC
Etchash
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.68 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
142.7481 Mh/s · 294.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
1.2893 Gh/s · 279.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
X16
X16R
33.4593 Mh/s · 254.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
31.2667 Mh/s · 265.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
BLA
Blake3
2.611 Gh/s · 141.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
ETH
Ethash
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
1.982 Gh/s · 198.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
55 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
435 Hh/s · 239.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
12.2248 Gh/s · 255.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
KEC
Keccak
2.4386 Gh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
11.5488 Mh/s · 162.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.8241Mh · 297.0W
|
$1.07 | $0.71 | $0.36 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
149.714Mh · 248.0W
|
$0.93 | $0.60 | $0.33 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.4362Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.53 | $-0.34 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
29.7784Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.54 | $-0.41 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
108Hh · 258.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.62 | $-0.49 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
120.7661Mh · 153.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.37 | $-0.31 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
17.7031Mh · 195.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.47 | $-0.41 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.40 | $-0.37 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
142.7481Mh · 294.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.71 | $-0.70 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
1.2893Gh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.2322Mh · 264.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
161.522Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.5981Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
33.4593Mh · 254.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
33.5292Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
31.2667Mh · 265.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
10.7611Mh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
23.1561Mh · 248.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
899.6252Mh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
8.1536Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4339Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.4814Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
4.7794Gh · 293.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.356Kh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
4.1903Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
2.611Gh · 141.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.982Gh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
55Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
435Hh · 239.0W
|
— | $0.57 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
12.2248Gh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
40.1438Mh · 261.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
87.817Hh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
111Hh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
2.4386Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
2.3984Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
11.5488Mh · 162.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
55.1996Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.8814Mh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
G
getablocks.com
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
hitablock.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
N
norpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rkstratum.rustykaspa.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.70 | $21.04 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.71 | $21.30 |
| 利润 | $-0.01 | $-0.26 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· NeoScrypt
· $0.10/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4070Ti 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 28.23 kg |
| Nuclear | 30.79 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 61.59 kg |
| Geothermal | 97.51 kg |
| Solar | 115.47 kg |
| Biofuels | 590.2 kg |
| Gas | 1,257.38 kg |
| Coal | 2,104.19 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,219 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,104 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 62 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 7 个区块 概览 1/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.07 | $32.06 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.71 | $21.30 |
| 利润 | $0.36 | $10.76 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.07 | $32.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.71 | $21.30 |
| 利润 | $0.36 | $10.80 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
★ 最佳
2.8241 Mh/s · 297.0 W
|
$0.36 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
149.714 Mh/s · 248.0 W
|
$0.22 |
|
OCT
Octopus
58.4362 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
29.7784 Mh/s · 225.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
108 Hh/s · 258.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
120.7661 Mh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.65 |
|
VER
VerusHash
17.7031 Mh/s · 195.0 W
|
$-0.65 |
|
ETC
Etchash
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.68 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
142.7481 Mh/s · 294.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
1.2893 Gh/s · 279.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
X16
X16R
33.4593 Mh/s · 254.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
31.2667 Mh/s · 265.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
BLA
Blake3
2.611 Gh/s · 141.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
ETH
Ethash
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
1.982 Gh/s · 198.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
55 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
435 Hh/s · 239.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
12.2248 Gh/s · 255.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
KEC
Keccak
2.4386 Gh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
11.5488 Mh/s · 162.0 W
|
$-0.71 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.8241Mh · 297.0W
|
$1.07 | $0.71 | $0.36 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
149.714Mh · 248.0W
|
$0.93 | $0.60 | $0.33 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.4362Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.53 | $-0.34 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
29.7784Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.54 | $-0.41 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
108Hh · 258.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.62 | $-0.49 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
120.7661Mh · 153.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.37 | $-0.31 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
17.7031Mh · 195.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.47 | $-0.41 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.40 | $-0.37 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
142.7481Mh · 294.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.71 | $-0.70 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
1.2893Gh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.2322Mh · 264.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
161.522Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.5981Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
33.4593Mh · 254.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
33.5292Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
31.2667Mh · 265.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
10.7611Mh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
23.1561Mh · 248.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
899.6252Mh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
8.1536Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4339Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.4814Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
4.7794Gh · 293.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.356Kh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
4.1903Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
2.611Gh · 141.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.982Gh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
55Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
435Hh · 239.0W
|
— | $0.57 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
12.2248Gh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
40.1438Mh · 261.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
87.817Hh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
111Hh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
2.4386Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
2.3984Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
11.5488Mh · 162.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
55.1996Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.8814Mh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
G
getablocks.com
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
hitablock.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
N
norpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rkstratum.rustykaspa.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.70 | $21.04 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.71 | $21.30 |
| 利润 | $-0.01 | $-0.26 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· NeoScrypt
· $0.10/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4070Ti 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 28.23 kg |
| Nuclear | 30.79 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 61.59 kg |
| Geothermal | 97.51 kg |
| Solar | 115.47 kg |
| Biofuels | 590.2 kg |
| Gas | 1,257.38 kg |
| Coal | 2,104.19 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,219 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,104 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 62 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.