LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR — Retour sur investissement
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR rapporte jusqu'à $1.11 par jour, meilleur en minant FishHash à 20.5 Mh/s. Également disponible : vente de hashpower KAWPOW ($-0.13/jour). Consomme 140 W au mur — à $0.10/kWh, rentable aux tarifs actuels.
Touchez pour changer · 7 sections Retour sur investissement 6/7
Ce GPU a ? Go de VRAM — la plupart des marchés d'IA exigent au moins 12 Go.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $1.45 | $43.60 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Profit | $1.11 | $33.40 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
Cette page a-t-elle été utile ?
Merci pour le retour !
Autre chose à partager ? Le formulaire est ouvert ci-dessous.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
Historique des paiements de minage
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $1.45 | $43.50 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Profit | $1.11 | $33.30 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
FIS
FishHash
★ Meilleur
20.5 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$1.11 |
|
OCT
Octopus
44.0 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$0.35 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
47 Mh/s · 85.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
44 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.09 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
0.45 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.18 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
22 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
22 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
115 Mh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
ETC
Etchash
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
7 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
EQU
Equihash
61 Hh/s · 115.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
SHA
Sha256
420 Mh/s · 70.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
ETH
Ethash
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
20.0 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
MER
Meraki
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
250 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
TON
Ton
1.8 Gh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
1.2 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
60.0 Hh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
BLA
Blake3
800 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
$1.45 | $0.34 | $1.11 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
44.0Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.69 | $0.22 | $0.47 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
47Mh · 85.0W
|
$0.27 | $0.20 | $0.07 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
44Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.25 | $0.34 | $-0.09 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.45Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.34 | $-0.18 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
22Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.34 | $-0.25 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
22Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.34 | $-0.25 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
115Mh · 130.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.31 | $-0.25 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.29 | $-0.26 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
7Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.34 | $-0.32 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
61Hh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
420Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
20.0Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
370.0Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
250Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.8Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1.2Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
60.0Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.15Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
2.3Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
21.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
450.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
800Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
850Kh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Historique des paiements hashmarket
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.21 | $6.25 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Profit | $-0.13 | $-3.95 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.00/day
Visiter on MRR →
MRR
Visiter on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 13.31 kg |
| Nuclear | 14.52 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 29.03 kg |
| Geothermal | 45.96 kg |
| Solar | 54.43 kg |
| Biofuels | 278.21 kg |
| Gas | 592.7 kg |
| Coal | 991.87 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR running 24/7 for a year releases about 575 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR's annual footprint swings from roughly 992 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 29 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Touchez pour changer · 7 sections Retour sur investissement 6/7
Ce GPU a ? Go de VRAM — la plupart des marchés d'IA exigent au moins 12 Go.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $1.45 | $43.60 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Profit | $1.11 | $33.40 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
Historique des paiements de minage
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $1.45 | $43.50 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Profit | $1.11 | $33.30 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
FIS
FishHash
★ Meilleur
20.5 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$1.11 |
|
OCT
Octopus
44.0 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$0.35 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
47 Mh/s · 85.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
44 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.09 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
0.45 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.18 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
22 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
22 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
115 Mh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
ETC
Etchash
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.31 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
7 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
EQU
Equihash
61 Hh/s · 115.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
SHA
Sha256
420 Mh/s · 70.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
ETH
Ethash
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
20.0 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
MER
Meraki
48 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
250 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
TON
Ton
1.8 Gh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
1.2 Hh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
60.0 Hh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
BLA
Blake3
800 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
$1.45 | $0.34 | $1.11 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
44.0Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.69 | $0.22 | $0.47 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
47Mh · 85.0W
|
$0.27 | $0.20 | $0.07 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
44Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.25 | $0.34 | $-0.09 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.45Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.34 | $-0.18 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
22Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.34 | $-0.25 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
22Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.34 | $-0.25 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
115Mh · 130.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.31 | $-0.25 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.29 | $-0.26 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
7Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.34 | $-0.32 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
61Hh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
420Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
20.0Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
370.0Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
250Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.8Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1.2Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
60.0Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.15Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
2.3Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
21.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
450.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
800Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
850Kh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Historique des paiements hashmarket
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.21 | $6.25 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Profit | $-0.13 | $-3.95 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.00/day
Visiter on MRR →
MRR
Visiter on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 13.31 kg |
| Nuclear | 14.52 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 29.03 kg |
| Geothermal | 45.96 kg |
| Solar | 54.43 kg |
| Biofuels | 278.21 kg |
| Gas | 592.7 kg |
| Coal | 991.87 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR running 24/7 for a year releases about 575 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 LHR's annual footprint swings from roughly 992 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 29 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.