LP Agent
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB perd $0.08 par jour en minant BeamHashIII à 11 Hh/s et en consommant 90.0 W au mur. C'est après déduction de l'électricité à $0.1/kWh — pas tout à fait à l'équilibre aux tarifs actuels.
Projection quotidienne
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.88 | $26.31 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.22 | $6.60 |
| Profit | $0.66 | $19.83 |
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
GTX 1060 6GB
$0.007/h ·
1 offre
|
$0.14
72.33 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00192
|
$0.22 |
$-0.08
★
Visiter →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
410Hh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
3Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
19Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
700Kh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.99Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
11Hh · 90.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.22 | $-0.18 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
8.199999Mh · 65.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.16 | $-0.13 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
39Hh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
47.7Mh · 66.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.16 | $-0.14 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
24Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
3Hh · 90.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
—
|
X16R
9.99Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
137Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
210Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.1Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
240Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
10.14Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
CKB
Nervos
|
Eaglesong
400Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
9.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
210Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
350.0Hh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
200.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
4.8Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
9.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
9.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
3Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
25Hh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
CuckooBFC
91Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
cuckARooz29
2Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
2Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
0.0Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
1.3Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
26.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Hex
145.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavy
800.0Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
44.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
135.0Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
26.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.8Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
4.2Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
600.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Eaglesong (CKB) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Mining algos
- 38
- Model
- NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB
- Power
- 115 W
- Process
- 16 nm
- Release
- 2016
- Release year
- 2016
- TDP
- 115 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Comment NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
GTX 1060 6GB
$0.007/h ·
1 offre
|
$0.14
72.33 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00192
|
$0.22 |
$-0.08
★
Visiter →
|
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB gagne $-0.08/jour en louant pour des charges IA — nettement plus que les $-0.18/jour en minant BeamHashIII. Minage et location sont mutuellement exclusifs ; le marché IA est le choix évident ici.
| Marché | Algorithme | Profit /jour | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.66
★
$0.88 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$0.74
★
$0.96 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000649688 BTC/M/d
|
$0.82
$1.04 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000059952 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.46 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.49 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000081606 BTC/M/d
|
$0.41
$0.63 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000057241 BTC/M/d
|
$0.21
★
$0.43 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.46 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000057407 BTC/M/d
|
$0.22
$0.44 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.20
$0.02 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
★
$0.21 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.24 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
$0.21 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061787 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.03 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.17 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.17 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
$0.19 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.03 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.07 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.12 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
$0.08 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.04 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.04 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
$0.01 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.02 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.03 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.02 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000547 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.02 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263526 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Eaglesong | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000071 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000111 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000192 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000230 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 8.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 9.33 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 18.66 kg |
| Geothermal | 29.55 kg |
| Solar | 34.99 kg |
| Biofuels | 178.85 kg |
| Gas | 381.02 kg |
| Coal | 637.63 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 369 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 638 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 19 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Projection quotidienne
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.88 | $26.31 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.22 | $6.60 |
| Profit | $0.66 | $19.83 |
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
GTX 1060 6GB
$0.007/h ·
1 offre
|
$0.14
72.33 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00192
|
$0.22 |
$-0.08
★
Visiter →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
410Hh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
3Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
19Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
700Kh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.99Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
11Hh · 90.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.22 | $-0.18 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
8.199999Mh · 65.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.16 | $-0.13 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
39Hh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
47.7Mh · 66.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.16 | $-0.14 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
24Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
3Hh · 90.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
—
|
X16R
9.99Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
137Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
210Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.1Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
240Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
10.14Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
CKB
Nervos
|
Eaglesong
400Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
9.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
210Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
350.0Hh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
200.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
4.8Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
9.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
9.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
3Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
25Hh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
CuckooBFC
91Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
cuckARooz29
2Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
2Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
0.0Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
1.3Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
26.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Hex
145.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavy
800.0Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
44.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
135.0Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
26.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.8Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
4.2Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
600.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Eaglesong (CKB) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Mining algos
- 38
- Model
- NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB
- Power
- 115 W
- Process
- 16 nm
- Release
- 2016
- Release year
- 2016
- TDP
- 115 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Comment NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
GTX 1060 6GB
$0.007/h ·
1 offre
|
$0.14
72.33 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00192
|
$0.22 |
$-0.08
★
Visiter →
|
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB gagne $-0.08/jour en louant pour des charges IA — nettement plus que les $-0.18/jour en minant BeamHashIII. Minage et location sont mutuellement exclusifs ; le marché IA est le choix évident ici.
| Marché | Algorithme | Profit /jour | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.66
★
$0.88 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$0.74
★
$0.96 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000649688 BTC/M/d
|
$0.82
$1.04 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000059952 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.46 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.49 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000081606 BTC/M/d
|
$0.41
$0.63 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000057241 BTC/M/d
|
$0.21
★
$0.43 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.46 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000057407 BTC/M/d
|
$0.22
$0.44 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.20
$0.02 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
★
$0.21 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.24 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
$0.21 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061787 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.03 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.17 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.17 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
$0.19 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.03 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.07 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.12 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
$0.08 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.04 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.04 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
$0.01 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.02 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.03 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.02 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000547 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.02 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263526 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Eaglesong | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000071 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000111 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000192 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000230 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 revenu · $0.22 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 8.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 9.33 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 18.66 kg |
| Geothermal | 29.55 kg |
| Solar | 34.99 kg |
| Biofuels | 178.85 kg |
| Gas | 381.02 kg |
| Coal | 637.63 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 369 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 638 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 19 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.