LP Agent
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB 每天净亏 $0.08 挖 BeamHashIII 算力 11 Hh/s 功耗 90.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情暂未回本。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.88 | $26.31 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.22 | $6.60 |
| 利润 | $0.66 | $19.83 |
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
GTX 1060 6GB
$0.007/h ·
1 个报价
|
$0.14
72.33 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00192
|
$0.22 |
$-0.08
★
访问 →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
410Hh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
3Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
19Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
700Kh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.99Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
11Hh · 90.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.22 | $-0.18 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
8.199999Mh · 65.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.16 | $-0.13 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
39Hh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
47.7Mh · 66.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.16 | $-0.14 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
24Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
3Hh · 90.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
—
|
X16R
9.99Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
137Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
210Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.1Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
240Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
10.14Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
CKB
Nervos
|
Eaglesong
400Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
9.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
210Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
350.0Hh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
200.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
4.8Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
9.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
9.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
3Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
25Hh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
CuckooBFC
91Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
cuckARooz29
2Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
2Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
0.0Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
1.3Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
26.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Hex
145.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavy
800.0Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
44.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
135.0Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
26.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.8Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
4.2Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
600.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Eaglesong (CKB) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Mining algos
- 38
- Model
- NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB
- Power
- 115 W
- Process
- 16 nm
- Release
- 2016
- Release year
- 2016
- TDP
- 115 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
GTX 1060 6GB
$0.007/h ·
1 个报价
|
$0.14
72.33 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00192
|
$0.22 |
$-0.08
★
访问 →
|
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $-0.08,明显超过挖 BeamHashIII 的 $-0.18/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.66
★
$0.88 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$0.74
★
$0.96 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000649688 BTC/M/d
|
$0.82
$1.04 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000059952 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.46 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.49 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000081606 BTC/M/d
|
$0.41
$0.63 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000057241 BTC/M/d
|
$0.21
★
$0.43 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.46 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000057407 BTC/M/d
|
$0.22
$0.44 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.20
$0.02 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
★
$0.21 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.24 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
$0.21 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061787 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.03 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
$0.19 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.03 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
$0.08 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
$0.01 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.02 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.03 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.02 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000547 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.02 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263526 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Eaglesong | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000071 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000111 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000192 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000230 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 8.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 9.33 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 18.66 kg |
| Geothermal | 29.55 kg |
| Solar | 34.99 kg |
| Biofuels | 178.85 kg |
| Gas | 381.02 kg |
| Coal | 637.63 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 369 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 638 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 19 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.88 | $26.31 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.22 | $6.60 |
| 利润 | $0.66 | $19.83 |
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
GTX 1060 6GB
$0.007/h ·
1 个报价
|
$0.14
72.33 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00192
|
$0.22 |
$-0.08
★
访问 →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
410Hh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
3Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
19Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
700Kh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.99Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
11Hh · 90.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.22 | $-0.18 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
8.199999Mh · 65.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.16 | $-0.13 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
39Hh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
47.7Mh · 66.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.16 | $-0.14 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
24Mh · 90.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
3Hh · 90.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
—
|
X16R
9.99Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
137Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
210Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.1Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
240Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
10.14Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
CKB
Nervos
|
Eaglesong
400Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
9.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
210Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
350.0Hh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
200.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
4.8Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
9.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
9.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
3Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
BeamHashII
25Hh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
CuckooBFC
91Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
cuckARooz29
2Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
2Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
0.0Hh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
1.3Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
26.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Hex
145.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavy
800.0Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
44.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
135.0Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
26.4Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.8Hh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22.5Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
4.2Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
600.0Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Eaglesong (CKB) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
- Architecture
- Pascal
- Mining algos
- 38
- Model
- NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB
- Power
- 115 W
- Process
- 16 nm
- Release
- 2016
- Release year
- 2016
- TDP
- 115 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
GTX 1060 6GB
$0.007/h ·
1 个报价
|
$0.14
72.33 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00192
|
$0.22 |
$-0.08
★
访问 →
|
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $-0.08,明显超过挖 BeamHashIII 的 $-0.18/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.66
★
$0.88 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$0.74
★
$0.96 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000649688 BTC/M/d
|
$0.82
$1.04 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000059952 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.46 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.49 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000081606 BTC/M/d
|
$0.41
$0.63 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000057241 BTC/M/d
|
$0.21
★
$0.43 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.46 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000057407 BTC/M/d
|
$0.22
$0.44 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.20
$0.02 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
★
$0.21 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.24 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
$0.21 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000061787 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.03 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
$0.19 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.03 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
$0.08 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
$0.01 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.02 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.03 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.02 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000547 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.02 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263526 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Eaglesong | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000071 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000111 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000192 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Eaglesong
0.00000000230 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.22 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 8.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 9.33 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 18.66 kg |
| Geothermal | 29.55 kg |
| Solar | 34.99 kg |
| Biofuels | 178.85 kg |
| Gas | 381.02 kg |
| Coal | 637.63 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 369 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that NVIDIA GTX 1060 6GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 638 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 19 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.