LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 4090
Nvidia RTX 4090 earns $6.68 per day renting on the AI GPU marketplace at a median rate of $0.32/h, drawing 328W. At $0.1/kWh electricity, the daily power cost is $0.91.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $7.59 | $227.66 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| 利润 | $6.68 | $200.30 |
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
1 个报价
|
$7.59
|
$0.91 |
$6.68
★
访问 →
|
|
Tensordock
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.350/h ·
15 个报价
|
$6.72
|
$0.91 |
$5.81
访问 →
|
|
Io Net
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.300/h ·
29 个报价
|
$5.76
|
$0.91 |
$4.85
访问 →
|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.139/h ·
168 个报价
|
$2.83
1,554 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00182
|
$0.91 |
$1.92
访问 →
|
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.000/h ·
30 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.91 |
$-0.91
访问 →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
275.0Mh · 380.0W
|
$3.54 | $0.91 | $2.63 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
333.9473Mh · 459.0W
|
$0.55 | $1.10 | $-0.55 |
|
—
|
Ethash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
272Mh · 192.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.46 | $-0.34 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.79 | $-0.73 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
185Hh · 310.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.74 | $-0.73 |
|
—
|
Blake3
5.7923Gh · 318.0W
|
— | $0.76 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
20.0425Gh · 318.0W
|
— | $0.76 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
64.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
120.0Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
3.15Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
260.0Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.4Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
4.1Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
11.0Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
2.0Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
3.1211Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
127.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 2230 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2520 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 16384
- GPU Power
- 450 W
- Max Memory Size
- 24 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 28
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4090
- Power
- 459 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- November 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 459 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia RTX 4090 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
1 个报价
|
$7.59
|
$0.91 |
$6.68
★
访问 →
|
|
Tensordock
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.350/h ·
15 个报价
|
$6.72
|
$0.91 |
$5.81
访问 →
|
|
Io Net
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.300/h ·
29 个报价
|
$5.76
|
$0.91 |
$4.85
访问 →
|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.139/h ·
168 个报价
|
$2.83
1,554 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00182
|
$0.91 |
$1.92
访问 →
|
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.000/h ·
30 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.91 |
$-0.91
访问 →
|
Nvidia RTX 4090 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $6.68,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $2.63/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002969 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.62 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$1.39
★
$2.30 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$12.49
★
$13.40 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000015403 BTC/M/d
|
$2.31
$3.22 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002179 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
$0.55 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006296 BTC/M/d
|
$0.69
★
$1.60 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$7.43
★
$8.34 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$2.05
$2.96 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003169 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.76
$0.15 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
★
$0.58 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.73 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000025471 BTC/M/d
|
$0.33
$1.24 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.73
★
$0.18 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000530 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.86
$0.05 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.79
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001507 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.77
★
$0.14 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001230 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.80
$0.11 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000584 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.79
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000047 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
17% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000067 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000260887 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.90
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000188 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.91
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4090 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 36.12 kg |
| Nuclear | 39.4 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 78.8 kg |
| Geothermal | 124.76 kg |
| Solar | 147.74 kg |
| Biofuels | 755.14 kg |
| Gas | 1,608.77 kg |
| Coal | 2,692.22 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,560 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,692 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 79 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $7.59 | $227.66 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| 利润 | $6.68 | $200.30 |
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
1 个报价
|
$7.59
|
$0.91 |
$6.68
★
访问 →
|
|
Tensordock
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.350/h ·
15 个报价
|
$6.72
|
$0.91 |
$5.81
访问 →
|
|
Io Net
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.300/h ·
29 个报价
|
$5.76
|
$0.91 |
$4.85
访问 →
|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.139/h ·
168 个报价
|
$2.83
1,554 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00182
|
$0.91 |
$1.92
访问 →
|
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.000/h ·
30 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.91 |
$-0.91
访问 →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
275.0Mh · 380.0W
|
$3.54 | $0.91 | $2.63 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
333.9473Mh · 459.0W
|
$0.55 | $1.10 | $-0.55 |
|
—
|
Ethash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
272Mh · 192.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.46 | $-0.34 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.79 | $-0.73 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
185Hh · 310.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.74 | $-0.73 |
|
—
|
Blake3
5.7923Gh · 318.0W
|
— | $0.76 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
20.0425Gh · 318.0W
|
— | $0.76 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
64.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
120.0Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
3.15Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
260.0Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.4Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
4.1Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
11.0Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
2.0Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
3.1211Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
127.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 2230 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2520 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 16384
- GPU Power
- 450 W
- Max Memory Size
- 24 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 28
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4090
- Power
- 459 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- November 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 459 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia RTX 4090 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
1 个报价
|
$7.59
|
$0.91 |
$6.68
★
访问 →
|
|
Tensordock
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.350/h ·
15 个报价
|
$6.72
|
$0.91 |
$5.81
访问 →
|
|
Io Net
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.300/h ·
29 个报价
|
$5.76
|
$0.91 |
$4.85
访问 →
|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.139/h ·
168 个报价
|
$2.83
1,554 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00182
|
$0.91 |
$1.92
访问 →
|
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.000/h ·
30 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.91 |
$-0.91
访问 →
|
Nvidia RTX 4090 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $6.68,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $2.63/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002969 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.62 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$1.39
★
$2.30 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$12.49
★
$13.40 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000015403 BTC/M/d
|
$2.31
$3.22 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002179 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
$0.55 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006296 BTC/M/d
|
$0.69
★
$1.60 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$7.43
★
$8.34 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$2.05
$2.96 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003169 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.76
$0.15 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
★
$0.58 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
★
$0.73 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000025471 BTC/M/d
|
$0.33
$1.24 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.73
★
$0.18 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000530 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.86
$0.05 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.79
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001507 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.77
★
$0.14 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001230 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.80
$0.11 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000584 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.79
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000047 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
17% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000067 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000260887 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.90
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 收入 · $0.91 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000188 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.91
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.91 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4090 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 36.12 kg |
| Nuclear | 39.4 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 78.8 kg |
| Geothermal | 124.76 kg |
| Solar | 147.74 kg |
| Biofuels | 755.14 kg |
| Gas | 1,608.77 kg |
| Coal | 2,692.22 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,560 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,692 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 79 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.