Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 earns $2.89 per day renting on the AI GPU marketplace at a median rate of $0.14/h, drawing 360W. At $0.1/kWh electricity, the daily power cost is $0.58.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $3.47 | $104.17 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $2.89 | $86.77 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
122Mh · 240.0W
|
$1.94 | $0.58 | $1.36 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
48Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.27 | $0.86 | $-0.59 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
240Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.86 | $-0.72 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
209Mh · 270.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.65 | $-0.54 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
120Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.48 | $-0.41 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
82Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.3Gh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
14.4Hh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
61Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
112Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
57Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.1Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.07Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
365Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
61Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
105Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
- Mining algos
- 1
- Model
- RTX 5080
- Power
- 280 W
- Release year
- 2025
- TDP
- 360 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.390/h ·
1 个报价
|
$8.70
|
$0.58 |
$8.12
★
访问 →
|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.152/h ·
1 个报价
|
$3.10
|
$0.58 |
$2.52
访问 →
|
|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.144/h ·
44 个报价
|
$2.93
1,572 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00187
|
$0.58 |
$2.35
访问 →
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.000/h ·
1 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.58 |
$-0.58
访问 →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $8.12,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $1.36/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000006942 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.27 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012980 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.07
$0.51 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013250 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
★
$0.52 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012582 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
$0.49 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002092 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.36 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
Octopus
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003403 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.34 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003160 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.21 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000492 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
$0.05 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
12% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001340 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.45
$0.13 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001982 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.19 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
Autolykos2
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000635 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.12 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001452 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.12 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000743 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.49
$0.09 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
Blake3
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000185 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.58
$0.00 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 22.81 kg |
| Nuclear | 24.88 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 49.77 kg |
| Geothermal | 78.8 kg |
| Solar | 93.31 kg |
| Biofuels | 476.93 kg |
| Gas | 1,016.06 kg |
| Coal | 1,700.35 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 running 24/7 for a year releases about 985 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,700 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 50 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $3.47 | $104.17 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $2.89 | $86.77 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
122Mh · 240.0W
|
$1.94 | $0.58 | $1.36 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
48Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.27 | $0.86 | $-0.59 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
240Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.86 | $-0.72 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
209Mh · 270.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.65 | $-0.54 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
120Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.48 | $-0.41 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
82Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.3Gh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
14.4Hh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
61Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
112Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
57Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.1Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.07Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
365Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
61Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
105Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
- Mining algos
- 1
- Model
- RTX 5080
- Power
- 280 W
- Release year
- 2025
- TDP
- 360 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.390/h ·
1 个报价
|
$8.70
|
$0.58 |
$8.12
★
访问 →
|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.152/h ·
1 个报价
|
$3.10
|
$0.58 |
$2.52
访问 →
|
|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.144/h ·
44 个报价
|
$2.93
1,572 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00187
|
$0.58 |
$2.35
访问 →
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.000/h ·
1 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.58 |
$-0.58
访问 →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $8.12,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $1.36/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000006942 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.27 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012980 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.07
$0.51 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013250 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
★
$0.52 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012582 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
$0.49 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002092 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.36 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
Octopus
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003403 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.34 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003160 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.21 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000492 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
$0.05 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
12% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001340 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.45
$0.13 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001982 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.19 收入 · $0.58 成本
|
|||
Autolykos2
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000635 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.12 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001452 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.12 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000743 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.49
$0.09 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
Blake3
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000185 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.58
$0.00 收入 · $0.58 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 22.81 kg |
| Nuclear | 24.88 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 49.77 kg |
| Geothermal | 78.8 kg |
| Solar | 93.31 kg |
| Biofuels | 476.93 kg |
| Gas | 1,016.06 kg |
| Coal | 1,700.35 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 running 24/7 for a year releases about 985 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,700 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 50 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.