LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 — 算力市场
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 每天净赚 最高 $8.12,最佳为 AI 出租 $0.36/小时,共 1 个挂单。 也可用于:挖 Octopus 算力 122 Mh/s($1.30/天) and 出售 KAWPOW 算力($-0.13/天)。 功耗 240 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 8 个区块 算力市场 4/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $6.17 | $184.95 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $5.59 | $167.55 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
此页面是否有帮助?
感谢您的反馈!
还有什么想告诉我们?表单已在下方打开。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.88 | $56.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $1.30 | $39.00 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ 最佳
122 Mh/s · 240.0 W
|
$1.30 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
209 Mh/s · 270.0 W
|
$0.63 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
150 Hh/s · 220.0 W
|
$0.28 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.1 Hh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.19 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
48 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$-0.39 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
240 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$-0.46 |
|
ETC
Etchash
120 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.51 |
|
FIS
FishHash
82 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
112 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
QHA
Qhash
365 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
14.4 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
BLA
Blake3
3.3 Gh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
ETH
Ethash
105 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
57 Kh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
61 Mh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
122Mh · 240.0W
|
$1.88 | $0.58 | $1.30 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
209Mh · 270.0W
|
$1.21 | $0.65 | $0.56 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.86 | $0.53 | $0.33 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.1Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.39 | $0.53 | $-0.14 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
48Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.86 | $-0.67 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
240Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.86 | $-0.74 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
120Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.48 | $-0.41 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
82Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
112Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
365Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
61Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
14.4Hh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.3Gh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
105Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
57Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.07Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
61Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $8.70 | $261.00 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $8.12 | $243.60 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.390/h ·
1 个报价
|
$8.70
|
$0.58 |
$8.12
★
访问 →
|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.333/h ·
51 个报价
|
$6.80
3,076 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00221
|
$0.58 |
$6.22
访问 →
|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.116/h ·
1 个报价
|
$2.36
|
$0.58 |
$1.78
访问 →
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.000/h ·
1 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.58 |
$-0.58
访问 →
|
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $8.12/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.45 | $13.64 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $-0.13 | $-3.76 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.16/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 22.81 kg |
| Nuclear | 24.88 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 49.77 kg |
| Geothermal | 78.8 kg |
| Solar | 93.31 kg |
| Biofuels | 476.93 kg |
| Gas | 1,016.06 kg |
| Coal | 1,700.35 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 running 24/7 for a year releases about 985 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,700 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 50 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 8 个区块 算力市场 4/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $6.17 | $184.95 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $5.59 | $167.55 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.88 | $56.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $1.30 | $39.00 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ 最佳
122 Mh/s · 240.0 W
|
$1.30 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
209 Mh/s · 270.0 W
|
$0.63 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
150 Hh/s · 220.0 W
|
$0.28 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.1 Hh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.19 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
48 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$-0.39 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
240 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$-0.46 |
|
ETC
Etchash
120 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.51 |
|
FIS
FishHash
82 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
112 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
QHA
Qhash
365 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
14.4 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
BLA
Blake3
3.3 Gh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
ETH
Ethash
105 Mh/s · 360.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
57 Kh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
61 Mh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.58 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
122Mh · 240.0W
|
$1.88 | $0.58 | $1.30 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
209Mh · 270.0W
|
$1.21 | $0.65 | $0.56 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.86 | $0.53 | $0.33 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.1Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.39 | $0.53 | $-0.14 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
48Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.86 | $-0.67 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
240Mh · 360.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.86 | $-0.74 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
120Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.48 | $-0.41 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
82Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
112Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
365Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
61Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
14.4Hh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.3Gh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
105Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
57Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.07Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
61Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $8.70 | $261.00 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $8.12 | $243.60 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.390/h ·
1 个报价
|
$8.70
|
$0.58 |
$8.12
★
访问 →
|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.333/h ·
51 个报价
|
$6.80
3,076 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00221
|
$0.58 |
$6.22
访问 →
|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.116/h ·
1 个报价
|
$2.36
|
$0.58 |
$1.78
访问 →
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5080
$0.000/h ·
1 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.58 |
$-0.58
访问 →
|
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $8.12/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.45 | $13.64 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.58 | $17.40 |
| 利润 | $-0.13 | $-3.76 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.16/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 22.81 kg |
| Nuclear | 24.88 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 49.77 kg |
| Geothermal | 78.8 kg |
| Solar | 93.31 kg |
| Biofuels | 476.93 kg |
| Gas | 1,016.06 kg |
| Coal | 1,700.35 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 running 24/7 for a year releases about 985 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,700 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 50 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.