LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 — AI 出租
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 每天净赚 最高 $7.59,最佳为 AI 出租 $0.35/小时,共 144 个挂单。 也可用于:挖 Octopus 算力 275.0 Mh/s($3.06/天) and 出售 Octopus 算力($1.41/天)。 功耗 380 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 8 个区块 AI 出租 3/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $7.21 | $216.26 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.79 | $23.70 |
| 利润 | $6.42 | $192.56 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
此页面是否有帮助?
感谢您的反馈!
还有什么想告诉我们?表单已在下方打开。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $4.34 | $130.20 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.79 | $23.70 |
| 利润 | $3.55 | $106.50 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
FIS
FishHash
★ 最佳
64.0 Mh/s · 330.0 W
|
$3.55 |
|
OCT
Octopus
275.0 Mh/s · 380.0 W
|
$3.28 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
333.9473 Mh/s · 459.0 W
|
$1.25 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
150 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$0.37 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.4 Hh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.49 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
272 Mh/s · 192.0 W
|
$-0.64 |
|
ETC
Etchash
118.073 Mh/s · 328.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
10.5 Hh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.76 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
20.0425 Gh/s · 318.0 W
|
$-0.78 |
|
EQU
Equihash
185 Hh/s · 310.0 W
|
$-0.78 |
|
SHA
Sha256
1.8 Gh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
ETH
Ethash
118.073 Mh/s · 328.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
IRO
IronFish
2.4 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
2.1 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
9.8 Gh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
2.2 Gh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
560 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
67 Mh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
110 Mh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
MER
Meraki
100 Mh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
720 Hh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
10.5 Kh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
QHA
Qhash
140 Mh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
TON
Ton
6.2 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
15.5 Hh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
BLA
Blake3
5.7923 Gh/s · 318.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
64.0Mh · 330.0W
|
$4.34 | $0.79 | $3.55 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
275.0Mh · 380.0W
|
$4.07 | $0.91 | $3.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
333.9473Mh · 459.0W
|
$2.04 | $1.10 | $0.94 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 250.0W
|
$1.16 | $0.60 | $0.56 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 260.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.62 | $-0.32 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
272Mh · 192.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.46 | $-0.31 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.79 | $-0.70 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.5Hh · 300.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.72 | $-0.69 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
20.0425Gh · 318.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.76 | $-0.75 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
185Hh · 310.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.74 | $-0.73 |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.8Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
9.8Gh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
2.0Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.5Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.2Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
560Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
67Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
110Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
100Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
720Hh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
10.5Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
140Mh · 380.0W
|
— | $0.91 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
6.2Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
3.1211Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.4Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
120.0Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
15.5Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
127.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
3.15Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
5.7923Gh · 318.0W
|
— | $0.76 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
11.0Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
icminers.com
|
Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
kriptokyng.com
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
solopool.fr
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $8.50 | $255.00 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| 利润 | $7.59 | $227.70 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fluence
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.500/h ·
3 个报价
|
$9.60
|
$0.91 |
$8.69
访问 →
|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.416/h ·
142 个报价
|
$8.50
3,851 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00221
|
$0.91 |
$7.59
★
访问 →
|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
1 个报价
|
$7.59
|
$0.91 |
$6.68
访问 →
|
Tensordock
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.377/h ·
9 个报价
|
$7.24
|
$0.91 |
$6.33
访问 →
|
Io Net
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.300/h ·
629 个报价
|
$5.76
|
$0.91 |
$4.85
访问 →
|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.161/h ·
1 个报价
|
$3.29
|
$0.91 |
$2.38
访问 →
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.000/h ·
32 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.91 |
$-0.91
访问 →
|
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $7.59/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.32 | $69.52 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| 利润 | $1.41 | $42.22 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· Octopus
· $1.41/day
访问 on MRR →
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 31.36 kg |
| Nuclear | 34.21 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 68.43 kg |
| Geothermal | 108.35 kg |
| Solar | 128.3 kg |
| Biofuels | 655.78 kg |
| Gas | 1,397.09 kg |
| Coal | 2,337.98 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,354 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,338 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 68 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 8 个区块 AI 出租 3/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $7.21 | $216.26 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.79 | $23.70 |
| 利润 | $6.42 | $192.56 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $4.34 | $130.20 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.79 | $23.70 |
| 利润 | $3.55 | $106.50 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
FIS
FishHash
★ 最佳
64.0 Mh/s · 330.0 W
|
$3.55 |
|
OCT
Octopus
275.0 Mh/s · 380.0 W
|
$3.28 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
333.9473 Mh/s · 459.0 W
|
$1.25 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
150 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$0.37 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.4 Hh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.49 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
272 Mh/s · 192.0 W
|
$-0.64 |
|
ETC
Etchash
118.073 Mh/s · 328.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
10.5 Hh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.76 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
20.0425 Gh/s · 318.0 W
|
$-0.78 |
|
EQU
Equihash
185 Hh/s · 310.0 W
|
$-0.78 |
|
SHA
Sha256
1.8 Gh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
ETH
Ethash
118.073 Mh/s · 328.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
IRO
IronFish
2.4 Mh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
2.1 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
9.8 Gh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
2.2 Gh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
560 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
67 Mh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
110 Mh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
MER
Meraki
100 Mh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
720 Hh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
10.5 Kh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
QHA
Qhash
140 Mh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
TON
Ton
6.2 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
15.5 Hh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
|
BLA
Blake3
5.7923 Gh/s · 318.0 W
|
$-0.79 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
64.0Mh · 330.0W
|
$4.34 | $0.79 | $3.55 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
275.0Mh · 380.0W
|
$4.07 | $0.91 | $3.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
333.9473Mh · 459.0W
|
$2.04 | $1.10 | $0.94 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 250.0W
|
$1.16 | $0.60 | $0.56 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 260.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.62 | $-0.32 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
272Mh · 192.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.46 | $-0.31 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.79 | $-0.70 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.5Hh · 300.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.72 | $-0.69 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
20.0425Gh · 318.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.76 | $-0.75 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
185Hh · 310.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.74 | $-0.73 |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.8Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
9.8Gh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
2.0Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.5Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.2Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
560Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
67Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
110Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
100Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
720Hh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
10.5Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
140Mh · 380.0W
|
— | $0.91 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
6.2Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
3.1211Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.4Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
120.0Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
15.5Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
127.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
3.15Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
5.7923Gh · 318.0W
|
— | $0.76 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
11.0Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
icminers.com
|
Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
kriptokyng.com
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
solopool.fr
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $8.50 | $255.00 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| 利润 | $7.59 | $227.70 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fluence
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.500/h ·
3 个报价
|
$9.60
|
$0.91 |
$8.69
访问 →
|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.416/h ·
142 个报价
|
$8.50
3,851 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00221
|
$0.91 |
$7.59
★
访问 →
|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
1 个报价
|
$7.59
|
$0.91 |
$6.68
访问 →
|
Tensordock
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.377/h ·
9 个报价
|
$7.24
|
$0.91 |
$6.33
访问 →
|
Io Net
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.300/h ·
629 个报价
|
$5.76
|
$0.91 |
$4.85
访问 →
|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.161/h ·
1 个报价
|
$3.29
|
$0.91 |
$2.38
访问 →
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.000/h ·
32 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.91 |
$-0.91
访问 →
|
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $7.59/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.32 | $69.52 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| 利润 | $1.41 | $42.22 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· Octopus
· $1.41/day
访问 on MRR →
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 31.36 kg |
| Nuclear | 34.21 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 68.43 kg |
| Geothermal | 108.35 kg |
| Solar | 128.3 kg |
| Biofuels | 655.78 kg |
| Gas | 1,397.09 kg |
| Coal | 2,337.98 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,354 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,338 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 68 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.