Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 — Minage
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 earns $3.54 per day renting on the AI GPU marketplace at a median rate of $0.19/h, drawing 328W. At $0.1/kWh electricity, the daily power cost is $0.91.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 mine Octopus avec le meilleur rendement. Cette page contient le classement complet des algorithmes, les options de minage fusionné, les pools recommandés, et un graphique d'historique des paiements que vous pouvez basculer en cliquant sur n'importe quelle ligne.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $4.45 | $133.62 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| Profit | $3.54 | $106.32 |
Historique des paiements par algorithme ▶ Octopus
Bénéfice net $/jour si vous miniez cet algorithme en continu à $0.1/kWh. Cliquez sur n'importe quel algorithme ci-dessus pour changer.
Projection quotidienne
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $4.10 | $123.00 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| Profit | $3.19 | $95.70 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
275.0Mh · 380.0W
|
$4.10 | $0.91 | $3.19 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
333.9473Mh · 459.0W
|
$0.19 | $1.10 | $-0.91 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
272Mh · 192.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.46 | $-0.30 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.5Hh · 300.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.72 | $-0.60 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.79 | $-0.70 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
20.0425Gh · 318.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.76 | $-0.74 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
185Hh · 310.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.74 | $-0.73 |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.8Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
64.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
120.0Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
127.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
3.1211Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
3.15Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
2.0Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
720Hh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
10.5Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
140Mh · 380.0W
|
— | $0.91 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
6.2Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
67Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.4Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
5.7923Gh · 318.0W
|
— | $0.76 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
9.8Gh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.5Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.2Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
11.0Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
110Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
15.5Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
560Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
100Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
Comment Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fluence
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.500/h ·
3 offres
|
$9.60
|
$0.91 |
$8.69
Visiter →
|
RunPod
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
1 offre
|
$7.59
|
$0.91 |
$6.68
★
Visiter →
|
Tensordock
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
23 offres
|
$6.53
|
$0.91 |
$5.62
Visiter →
|
Io Net
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.300/h ·
93 offres
|
$5.76
|
$0.91 |
$4.85
Visiter →
|
|
Vast.ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.149/h ·
1 offre
|
$3.04
|
$0.91 |
$2.13
Visiter →
|
|
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.139/h ·
168 offres
|
$2.83
1,380 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00205
|
$0.91 |
$1.92
Visiter →
|
Akash
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.000/h ·
30 offres
|
$0.00
|
$0.91 |
$-0.91
Visiter →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 gagne $6.68/jour en louant pour des charges IA — nettement plus que les $3.19/jour en minant Octopus. Minage et location sont mutuellement exclusifs ; le marché IA est le choix évident ici.
Historique des revenus nets de location
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $7.59 | $227.70 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| Profit | $6.68 | $200.40 |
| Marché | Algorithme | Profit /jour | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003664 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
★
$0.82 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002148 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.58 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000001011 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.81
$0.10 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.78
$0.13 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001711 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.75
$0.16 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001333 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.78
$0.13 revenu · $0.91 coût
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003145 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.75
$0.16 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
Autolykos2
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000727 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.75
$0.16 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.77
$0.14 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000761 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.82
$0.09 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000081 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR floor
21% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000089 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000085 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
|
|||
KHeavyHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000266261 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR floor
22% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000373000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000507000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
|
|||
|
Blake3
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000052658 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR floor
23% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000066900 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000082630 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000066190 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
|
|||
Historique des revenus nets du marché du hashrate
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.82 | $24.46 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| Profit | $-0.09 | $-2.84 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 36.12 kg |
| Nuclear | 39.4 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 78.8 kg |
| Geothermal | 124.76 kg |
| Solar | 147.74 kg |
| Biofuels | 755.14 kg |
| Gas | 1,608.77 kg |
| Coal | 2,692.22 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,560 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,692 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 79 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $4.45 | $133.62 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| Profit | $3.54 | $106.32 |
Historique des paiements par algorithme ▶ Octopus
Bénéfice net $/jour si vous miniez cet algorithme en continu à $0.1/kWh. Cliquez sur n'importe quel algorithme ci-dessus pour changer.
Projection quotidienne
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $4.10 | $123.00 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| Profit | $3.19 | $95.70 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
275.0Mh · 380.0W
|
$4.10 | $0.91 | $3.19 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
333.9473Mh · 459.0W
|
$0.19 | $1.10 | $-0.91 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
272Mh · 192.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.46 | $-0.30 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.5Hh · 300.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.72 | $-0.60 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.79 | $-0.70 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
20.0425Gh · 318.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.76 | $-0.74 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
185Hh · 310.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.74 | $-0.73 |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.8Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
64.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
120.0Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
127.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
3.1211Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
3.15Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
2.0Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
720Hh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
10.5Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
140Mh · 380.0W
|
— | $0.91 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
6.2Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
67Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.4Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
5.7923Gh · 318.0W
|
— | $0.76 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
9.8Gh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.5Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.2Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
2.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
11.0Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
118.073Mh · 328.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
110Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
15.5Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
560Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
100Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
67.0Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
Comment Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fluence
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.500/h ·
3 offres
|
$9.60
|
$0.91 |
$8.69
Visiter →
|
RunPod
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
1 offre
|
$7.59
|
$0.91 |
$6.68
★
Visiter →
|
Tensordock
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.340/h ·
23 offres
|
$6.53
|
$0.91 |
$5.62
Visiter →
|
Io Net
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.300/h ·
93 offres
|
$5.76
|
$0.91 |
$4.85
Visiter →
|
|
Vast.ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.149/h ·
1 offre
|
$3.04
|
$0.91 |
$2.13
Visiter →
|
|
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.139/h ·
168 offres
|
$2.83
1,380 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00205
|
$0.91 |
$1.92
Visiter →
|
Akash
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 4090
$0.000/h ·
30 offres
|
$0.00
|
$0.91 |
$-0.91
Visiter →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 gagne $6.68/jour en louant pour des charges IA — nettement plus que les $3.19/jour en minant Octopus. Minage et location sont mutuellement exclusifs ; le marché IA est le choix évident ici.
Historique des revenus nets de location
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $7.59 | $227.70 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| Profit | $6.68 | $200.40 |
| Marché | Algorithme | Profit /jour | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003664 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
★
$0.82 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002148 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.58 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000001011 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.81
$0.10 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.78
$0.13 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001711 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.75
$0.16 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001333 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.78
$0.13 revenu · $0.91 coût
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003145 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.75
$0.16 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
Autolykos2
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000727 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.75
$0.16 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.77
$0.14 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000761 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.82
$0.09 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000081 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR floor
21% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000089 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000085 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
|
|||
KHeavyHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000266261 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR floor
22% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000373000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000507000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.90
$0.01 revenu · $0.91 coût
|
|||
|
Blake3
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000052658 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR floor
23% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000066900 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000082630 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
Visiter →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000066190 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.91
$0.00 revenu · $0.91 coût
|
|||
Historique des revenus nets du marché du hashrate
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.82 | $24.46 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.91 | $27.30 |
| Profit | $-0.09 | $-2.84 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 36.12 kg |
| Nuclear | 39.4 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 78.8 kg |
| Geothermal | 124.76 kg |
| Solar | 147.74 kg |
| Biofuels | 755.14 kg |
| Gas | 1,608.77 kg |
| Coal | 2,692.22 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,560 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,692 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 79 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.