LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 — Retour sur investissement
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 rapporte jusqu'à $18.87 par jour, meilleur en location IA à $0.83/h avec 135 offres. Également disponible : minage NexaPoW à 360 Mh/s ($0.98/jour) and vente de hashpower FishHash ($-0.44/jour). Consomme 400 W au mur — à $0.10/kWh, rentable aux tarifs actuels.
Touchez pour changer · 8 sections Retour sur investissement 7/8
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $16.10 | $483.08 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.96 | $28.80 |
| Profit | $15.14 | $454.28 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
LP Agent
Historique des paiements de minage
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $1.94 | $58.20 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.96 | $28.80 |
| Profit | $0.98 | $29.40 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
NEX
NexaPoW
★ Meilleur
360 Mh/s · 400.0 W
|
$0.98 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
190 Hh/s · 280.0 W
|
$0.05 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
580 Mh/s · 310.0 W
|
$-0.66 |
|
ETC
Etchash
160 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.86 |
|
FIS
FishHash
160.0 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
130 Kh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
160 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
48.0 Gh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
BLA
Blake3
7.5 Gh/s · 400.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
ETH
Ethash
28.5 hh/s · 390.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
360Mh · 400.0W
|
$1.94 | $0.96 | $0.98 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
190Hh · 280.0W
|
$1.01 | $0.67 | $0.34 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
580Mh · 310.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.74 | $-0.44 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
160Mh · 290.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.70 | $-0.60 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
160.0Mh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
130Kh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
160Mh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
85Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
48.0Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
7.5Gh · 400.0W
|
— | $0.96 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
28.5hh · 390.0W
|
— | $0.94 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1
1miner.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
6
666pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
A
aikapool.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
A
antpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
baikalmine.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
bitsolo.me
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
btcz.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cloverpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
coolpool.top
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cruxpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
emcd.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
epic.iniaku.my.id
|
ProgPow (EPIC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
epicmine.io
|
ProgPow (EPIC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.herominers.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.nanopool.org
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.2miners.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.crazypool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.herominers.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.molepool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.pool2mine.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.solopool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ethcore.ru
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ethereum-classic.miningpoolhub.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
eu.go-poolmining.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
F
f2pool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
F
fenixpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
G
gtpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashbay.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
★
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
H
himpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hiveon.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
I
ironfish.herominers.com
|
FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
J
jjpool.fr
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
K
k1pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
K
korvexpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
L
l6pool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
L
longpool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
M
m2pool.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
M
minepoolis.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
M
moneroocean.stream
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nexa.2miners.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nexa.acc-pool.pw
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nushypool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
O
okminer.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.binance.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.rplant.xyz
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
P
poolin.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pooly.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rockpool.cloud
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
sigmanauts.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
S
skypool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo-erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo-etc.2miners.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo-nexa.2miners.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.nexa.acc-pool.pw
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
S
spiderpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
S
swgroupe.fr
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tw-pool.com
|
FishHash (IRON) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
V
viabtc.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
W
woolypooly.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
X
xsg.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zk.work
|
FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zpool.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
Historique des revenus nets de location
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $19.83 | $594.90 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.96 | $28.80 |
| Profit | $18.87 | $566.10 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.972/h ·
135 offres
|
$19.83
8,333 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00238
|
$0.96 |
$18.87
★
Visiter →
|
Io Net
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.850/h ·
8 offres
|
$16.32
|
$0.96 |
$15.36
Visiter →
|
RunPod
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.690/h ·
1 offre
|
$15.40
|
$0.96 |
$14.44
Visiter →
|
Tensordock
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.540/h ·
4 offres
|
$10.37
|
$0.96 |
$9.41
Visiter →
|
|
Vast.ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.320/h ·
2 offres
|
$6.54
|
$0.96 |
$5.58
Visiter →
|
Akash
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.000/h ·
22 offres
|
$0.00
|
$0.96 |
$-0.96
Visiter →
|
Flux de revenus Comment Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA how we got $18.87/day · ▾
Historique des paiements hashmarket
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.52 | $15.52 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.96 | $28.80 |
| Profit | $-0.44 | $-13.28 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 38.02 kg |
| Nuclear | 41.47 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 82.94 kg |
| Geothermal | 131.33 kg |
| Solar | 155.52 kg |
| Biofuels | 794.88 kg |
| Gas | 1,693.44 kg |
| Coal | 2,833.92 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,642 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,834 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 83 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Touchez pour changer · 8 sections Retour sur investissement 7/8
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $16.10 | $483.08 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.96 | $28.80 |
| Profit | $15.14 | $454.28 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
Historique des paiements de minage
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $1.94 | $58.20 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.96 | $28.80 |
| Profit | $0.98 | $29.40 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
NEX
NexaPoW
★ Meilleur
360 Mh/s · 400.0 W
|
$0.98 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
190 Hh/s · 280.0 W
|
$0.05 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
580 Mh/s · 310.0 W
|
$-0.66 |
|
ETC
Etchash
160 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.86 |
|
FIS
FishHash
160.0 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
130 Kh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
160 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
48.0 Gh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
BLA
Blake3
7.5 Gh/s · 400.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
|
ETH
Ethash
28.5 hh/s · 390.0 W
|
$-0.96 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
360Mh · 400.0W
|
$1.94 | $0.96 | $0.98 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
190Hh · 280.0W
|
$1.01 | $0.67 | $0.34 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
580Mh · 310.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.74 | $-0.44 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
160Mh · 290.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.70 | $-0.60 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
160.0Mh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
130Kh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
160Mh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
85Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
48.0Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
7.5Gh · 400.0W
|
— | $0.96 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
28.5hh · 390.0W
|
— | $0.94 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1
1miner.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
6
666pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
A
aikapool.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
A
antpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
baikalmine.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
bitsolo.me
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
btcz.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cloverpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
coolpool.top
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cruxpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
emcd.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
epic.iniaku.my.id
|
ProgPow (EPIC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
epicmine.io
|
ProgPow (EPIC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.herominers.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.nanopool.org
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.2miners.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.crazypool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.herominers.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.molepool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.pool2mine.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.solopool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ethcore.ru
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ethereum-classic.miningpoolhub.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
eu.go-poolmining.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
F
f2pool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
F
fenixpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
G
gtpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashbay.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
★
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
H
himpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hiveon.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
I
ironfish.herominers.com
|
FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
J
jjpool.fr
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
K
k1pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
K
korvexpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
L
l6pool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
L
longpool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
M
m2pool.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
M
minepoolis.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
M
moneroocean.stream
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nexa.2miners.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nexa.acc-pool.pw
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nushypool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
O
okminer.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.binance.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.rplant.xyz
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
P
poolin.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pooly.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rockpool.cloud
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
sigmanauts.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
S
skypool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo-erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo-etc.2miners.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo-nexa.2miners.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.nexa.acc-pool.pw
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
S
spiderpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
S
swgroupe.fr
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tw-pool.com
|
FishHash (IRON) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
V
viabtc.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
W
woolypooly.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
X
xsg.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zk.work
|
FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zpool.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
Historique des revenus nets de location
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $19.83 | $594.90 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.96 | $28.80 |
| Profit | $18.87 | $566.10 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Fournisseur | GPU | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.972/h ·
135 offres
|
$19.83
8,333 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00238
|
$0.96 |
$18.87
★
Visiter →
|
Io Net
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.850/h ·
8 offres
|
$16.32
|
$0.96 |
$15.36
Visiter →
|
RunPod
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.690/h ·
1 offre
|
$15.40
|
$0.96 |
$14.44
Visiter →
|
Tensordock
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.540/h ·
4 offres
|
$10.37
|
$0.96 |
$9.41
Visiter →
|
|
Vast.ai
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.320/h ·
2 offres
|
$6.54
|
$0.96 |
$5.58
Visiter →
|
Akash
Place de marché GPU
|
RTX 5090
$0.000/h ·
22 offres
|
$0.00
|
$0.96 |
$-0.96
Visiter →
|
Flux de revenus Comment Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA how we got $18.87/day · ▾
Historique des paiements hashmarket
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.52 | $15.52 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.96 | $28.80 |
| Profit | $-0.44 | $-13.28 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 38.02 kg |
| Nuclear | 41.47 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 82.94 kg |
| Geothermal | 131.33 kg |
| Solar | 155.52 kg |
| Biofuels | 794.88 kg |
| Gas | 1,693.44 kg |
| Coal | 2,833.92 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,642 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,834 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 83 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.