LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 4070Ti — Retour sur investissement
Nvidia RTX 4070Ti rapporte jusqu'à $0.33 par jour, meilleur en minant NexaPoW à 149.714 Mh/s. Également disponible : vente de hashpower NeoScrypt ($0.10/jour). Consomme 248 W au mur — à $0.10/kWh, rentable aux tarifs actuels.
Touchez pour changer · 7 sections Retour sur investissement 6/7
Ce GPU a ? Go de VRAM — la plupart des marchés d'IA exigent au moins 12 Go.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.93 | $27.84 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $0.33 | $9.84 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
Cette page a-t-elle été utile ?
Merci pour le retour !
Autre chose à partager ? Le formulaire est ouvert ci-dessous.
Historique des paiements de minage
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.93 | $27.90 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $0.33 | $9.90 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
NEX
NexaPoW
★ Meilleur
149.714 Mh/s · 248.0 W
|
$0.33 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
2.8241 Mh/s · 297.0 W
|
$0.07 |
|
OCT
Octopus
58.4362 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
108 Hh/s · 258.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
29.7784 Mh/s · 225.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
120.7661 Mh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
VER
VerusHash
17.7031 Mh/s · 195.0 W
|
$-0.55 |
|
ETC
Etchash
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.57 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
142.7481 Mh/s · 294.0 W
|
$-0.59 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
1.2893 Gh/s · 279.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
X16
X16R
33.4593 Mh/s · 254.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
31.2667 Mh/s · 265.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
BLA
Blake3
2.611 Gh/s · 141.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
ETH
Ethash
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
1.982 Gh/s · 198.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
55 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
435 Hh/s · 239.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
12.2248 Gh/s · 255.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
KEC
Keccak
2.4386 Gh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
11.5488 Mh/s · 162.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
149.714Mh · 248.0W
|
$0.93 | $0.60 | $0.33 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.8241Mh · 297.0W
|
$0.67 | $0.71 | $-0.04 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.4362Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.53 | $-0.34 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
108Hh · 258.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.62 | $-0.50 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
29.7784Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.54 | $-0.42 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
120.7661Mh · 153.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.37 | $-0.31 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
17.7031Mh · 195.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.47 | $-0.42 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.40 | $-0.37 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
142.7481Mh · 294.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.71 | $-0.70 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
1.2893Gh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.2322Mh · 264.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
161.522Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.5981Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
33.4593Mh · 254.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
33.5292Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
31.2667Mh · 265.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
10.7611Mh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
23.1561Mh · 248.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
899.6252Mh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
8.1536Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4339Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.4814Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
4.7794Gh · 293.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.356Kh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
4.1903Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
2.611Gh · 141.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.982Gh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
55Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
435Hh · 239.0W
|
— | $0.57 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
12.2248Gh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
40.1438Mh · 261.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
87.817Hh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
111Hh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
2.4386Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
2.3984Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
11.5488Mh · 162.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
55.1996Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.8814Mh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
G
getablocks.com
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
hitablock.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
N
norpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rkstratum.rustykaspa.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Historique des paiements hashmarket
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.70 | $21.05 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $0.10 | $3.05 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
MRR
· NeoScrypt
· $0.21/day
Visiter on MRR →
Visiter on MRR →
MRR
Visiter on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia RTX 4070Ti
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 23.57 kg |
| Nuclear | 25.71 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 51.43 kg |
| Geothermal | 81.42 kg |
| Solar | 96.42 kg |
| Biofuels | 492.83 kg |
| Gas | 1,049.93 kg |
| Coal | 1,757.03 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,018 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,757 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 51 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Touchez pour changer · 7 sections Retour sur investissement 6/7
Ce GPU a ? Go de VRAM — la plupart des marchés d'IA exigent au moins 12 Go.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.93 | $27.84 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $0.33 | $9.84 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
Historique des paiements de minage
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.93 | $27.90 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $0.33 | $9.90 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
NEX
NexaPoW
★ Meilleur
149.714 Mh/s · 248.0 W
|
$0.33 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
2.8241 Mh/s · 297.0 W
|
$0.07 |
|
OCT
Octopus
58.4362 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
108 Hh/s · 258.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
29.7784 Mh/s · 225.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
120.7661 Mh/s · 153.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
VER
VerusHash
17.7031 Mh/s · 195.0 W
|
$-0.55 |
|
ETC
Etchash
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.57 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
142.7481 Mh/s · 294.0 W
|
$-0.59 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
1.2893 Gh/s · 279.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
X16
X16R
33.4593 Mh/s · 254.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
31.2667 Mh/s · 265.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
BLA
Blake3
2.611 Gh/s · 141.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
ETH
Ethash
50.647 Mh/s · 165.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
1.982 Gh/s · 198.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
55 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
435 Hh/s · 239.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
12.2248 Gh/s · 255.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
KEC
Keccak
2.4386 Gh/s · 289.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
11.5488 Mh/s · 162.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
149.714Mh · 248.0W
|
$0.93 | $0.60 | $0.33 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.8241Mh · 297.0W
|
$0.67 | $0.71 | $-0.04 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.4362Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.53 | $-0.34 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
108Hh · 258.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.62 | $-0.50 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
29.7784Mh · 225.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.54 | $-0.42 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
120.7661Mh · 153.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.37 | $-0.31 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
17.7031Mh · 195.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.47 | $-0.42 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.40 | $-0.37 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
142.7481Mh · 294.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.71 | $-0.70 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
1.2893Gh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.2322Mh · 264.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
161.522Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.5981Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
33.4593Mh · 254.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
33.5292Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
31.2667Mh · 265.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
10.7611Mh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
23.1561Mh · 248.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
899.6252Mh · 279.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
8.1536Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4339Mh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.4814Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
4.7794Gh · 293.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.356Kh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
4.1903Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
2.611Gh · 141.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
50.647Mh · 165.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.982Gh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
55Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
435Hh · 239.0W
|
— | $0.57 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
12.2248Gh · 255.0W
|
— | $0.61 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
40.1438Mh · 261.0W
|
— | $0.63 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
87.817Hh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
111Hh · 252.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
2.4386Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
2.3984Gh · 289.0W
|
— | $0.69 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
11.5488Mh · 162.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
55.1996Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.8814Mh · 266.0W
|
— | $0.64 | — |
| Pool | Algos supportés | Frais | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
G
getablocks.com
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
hitablock.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
N
norpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rkstratum.rustykaspa.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Historique des paiements hashmarket
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.70 | $21.05 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $0.10 | $3.05 |
Mélange de consensus interne — dérivé de sources externes, pas un cours brut d'un seul marché.
MRR
· NeoScrypt
· $0.21/day
Visiter on MRR →
Visiter on MRR →
MRR
Visiter on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia RTX 4070Ti
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 23.57 kg |
| Nuclear | 25.71 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 51.43 kg |
| Geothermal | 81.42 kg |
| Solar | 96.42 kg |
| Biofuels | 492.83 kg |
| Gas | 1,049.93 kg |
| Coal | 1,757.03 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,018 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,757 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 51 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.