AMD RX 460 — Marché du hashrate
AMD RX 460 rapporte $0.02 par jour en minant BeamHashIII à 6.33 Hh/s et en consommant 0.0 W au mur. C'est après déduction de l'électricité à $0.1/kWh — rentable aux tarifs actuels.
Vendre la puissance de calcul du AMD RX 460 plutôt que de miner directement. Chaque ligne affiche les tarifs BeamHashIII en direct de NiceHash et Mining Rig Rentals — profondeur du carnet d'ordres, prix pondéré et profit quotidien après électricité à $0.1/kWh.
Projection quotidienne
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.46 | $13.69 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.00 | $0.00 |
| Profit | $0.46 | $13.69 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
6.33Hh · 0.0W
|
$0.02 | — | $0.02 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
4.862Mh · 45.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.11 | $-0.09 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
29.0717Mh · 47.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.11 | $-0.10 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
1.13Mh · 41.0W
|
— | $0.10 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
14.2706Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
536.571Hh · 44.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa2
8.365Kh · 52.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
7.146Hh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
10.97Hh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
2.0255Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
9.4441Mh · 54.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
18.325Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
1.058Mh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
377Kh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
5.8604Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
3.794Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
4.1128Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
121.9891Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
9.4747Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
488.1699Kh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
16.7696Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
157.25Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X16R
3.2421Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
3.2435Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
3.1171Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
3.2436Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X17
3.2246Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
1.0173Mh · 53.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
10.37Hh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
X22i
1.7972Mh · 53.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
1.7773Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
2.498Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
0.5Hh · 44.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
46.7155Mh · 57.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
17.0992Kh · 49.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
1.7737Mh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
KangarooTwelve
325.7712Mh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
1.858Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
3.342Mh · 68.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
340.6126Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X11k
660.3141Kh · 52.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-ninja
0.029Hh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
Phi5
5.148Hh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
13.1268Mh · 42.0W
|
— | $0.10 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
6.677Hh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
44.67Hh · 48.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
982.8462Mh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
133.0766Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
BCD
3.7958Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
C11
4.5134Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
- Base Frequency
- 1090 MHz
- Boost Frequency
- 1200 MHz
- Max Memory Bandwidth
- 112 GB/s
- Max Memory Size
- 2 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- OpenCL
- 2
- OpenGL
- 4.5
- Typical Board Power (Desktop)
- 70 W
| Marché | Algorithme | Profit /jour | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.34
★
$0.34 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$28.22
★
$28.22 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$0.61
$0.61 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.46
★
$0.46 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$0.50
★
$0.50 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000725028 BTC/M/d
|
$0.60
$0.60 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000025540 BTC/M/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.06 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.16 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000088219 BTC/M/d
|
$0.22
$0.22 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000021203 BTC/M/d
|
$0.05
★
$0.05 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.16 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000056575 BTC/M/d
|
$0.14
$0.14 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000063880 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.09 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.09 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
$0.11 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000816 BTC/H/d
|
$0.0066
$0.01 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.06 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.07
★
$0.07 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.06
$0.06 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005720 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010635 BTC/M/d
|
$0.04
★
$0.04 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012495 BTC/M/d
|
$0.05
★
$0.05 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012282 BTC/M/d
|
$0.05
$0.05 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002288 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0032
$0.00 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.03 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000014372 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
$0.02 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004361 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001910 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000564 BTC/M/d
|
$0.01
★
$0.01 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000545 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0005
$0.00 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0012
★
$0.00 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001567 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0014
★
$0.00 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001217 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0011
$0.00 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour AMD RX 460
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 0.0 kg |
| Nuclear | 0.0 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 0.0 kg |
| Geothermal | 0.0 kg |
| Solar | 0.0 kg |
| Biofuels | 0.0 kg |
| Gas | 0.0 kg |
| Coal | 0.0 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 460 running 24/7 for a year releases about 0 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 460's annual footprint swings from roughly 0 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 0 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Projection quotidienne
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.46 | $13.69 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.00 | $0.00 |
| Profit | $0.46 | $13.69 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
6.33Hh · 0.0W
|
$0.02 | — | $0.02 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
4.862Mh · 45.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.11 | $-0.09 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
29.0717Mh · 47.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.11 | $-0.10 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
1.13Mh · 41.0W
|
— | $0.10 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
14.2706Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
536.571Hh · 44.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa2
8.365Kh · 52.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
7.146Hh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
10.97Hh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
2.0255Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
HoneyComb
9.4441Mh · 54.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
18.325Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
1.058Mh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
377Kh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
5.8604Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
3.794Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
4.1128Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
121.9891Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Skunkhash
9.4747Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
SonoA
488.1699Kh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
16.7696Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
157.25Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X16R
3.2421Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
3.2435Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
3.1171Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
3.2436Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X17
3.2246Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
1.0173Mh · 53.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
10.37Hh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
X22i
1.7972Mh · 53.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
1.7773Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
2.498Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
0.5Hh · 44.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
46.7155Mh · 57.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Chukwa
17.0992Kh · 49.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
1.7737Mh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
KangarooTwelve
325.7712Mh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
1.858Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
3.342Mh · 68.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
340.6126Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
X11k
660.3141Kh · 52.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-ninja
0.029Hh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
Phi5
5.148Hh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
13.1268Mh · 42.0W
|
— | $0.10 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
6.677Hh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
44.67Hh · 48.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
982.8462Mh · 47.0W
|
— | $0.11 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
133.0766Kh · 0.0W
|
— | — | — |
|
—
|
BCD
3.7958Mh · 56.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
C11
4.5134Mh · 55.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
- Base Frequency
- 1090 MHz
- Boost Frequency
- 1200 MHz
- Max Memory Bandwidth
- 112 GB/s
- Max Memory Size
- 2 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- OpenCL
- 2
- OpenGL
- 4.5
- Typical Board Power (Desktop)
- 70 W
| Marché | Algorithme | Profit /jour | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.34
★
$0.34 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$28.22
★
$28.22 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$0.61
$0.61 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.46
★
$0.46 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$0.50
★
$0.50 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000725028 BTC/M/d
|
$0.60
$0.60 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000025540 BTC/M/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.06 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.16 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000088219 BTC/M/d
|
$0.22
$0.22 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000021203 BTC/M/d
|
$0.05
★
$0.05 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.16 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000056575 BTC/M/d
|
$0.14
$0.14 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000063880 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.09 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.09 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
$0.11 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000816 BTC/H/d
|
$0.0066
$0.01 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.06 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.07
★
$0.07 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.06
$0.06 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005720 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010635 BTC/M/d
|
$0.04
★
$0.04 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012495 BTC/M/d
|
$0.05
★
$0.05 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012282 BTC/M/d
|
$0.05
$0.05 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002288 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0032
$0.00 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.03 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000014372 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
$0.02 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004361 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001910 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.02 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000564 BTC/M/d
|
$0.01
★
$0.01 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000545 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0005
$0.00 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0012
★
$0.00 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001567 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0014
★
$0.00 revenu · — coût
Visiter →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001217 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0011
$0.00 revenu · — coût
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour AMD RX 460
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 0.0 kg |
| Nuclear | 0.0 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 0.0 kg |
| Geothermal | 0.0 kg |
| Solar | 0.0 kg |
| Biofuels | 0.0 kg |
| Gas | 0.0 kg |
| Coal | 0.0 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 460 running 24/7 for a year releases about 0 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 460's annual footprint swings from roughly 0 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 0 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.