LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 4080
Nvidia RTX 4080 earns $5.39 per day renting on the AI GPU marketplace at a median rate of $0.25/h, drawing 180W. At $0.1/kWh electricity, the daily power cost is $0.64.
Daily projection RENTAL
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $6.03 | $180.79 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.64 | $19.20 |
| Profit | $5.39 | $161.71 |
| Provider | GPU | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.270/h ·
1 offer
|
$6.03
|
$0.64 |
$5.39
★
Visit →
|
|
Tensordock
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.150/h ·
2 offers
|
$2.88
|
$0.64 |
$2.24
Visit →
|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.068/h ·
10 offers
|
$1.38
844 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00164
|
$0.64 |
$0.74
Visit →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
120Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
189Mh · 265.0W
|
$0.31 | $0.64 | $-0.33 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42.0406Mh · 302.0W
|
$0.18 | $0.72 | $-0.54 |
|
—
|
Ethash
85Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
125Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
171.2Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.34 | $-0.27 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
110Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.43 | $-0.37 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
14Hh · 180.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.43 | $-0.40 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
189Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.4378Gh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
115Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
46.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
8.7Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.65Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
87.0Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
1.2Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
48.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 2210 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2510 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 9728
- GPU Power
- 320 W
- Max Memory Size
- 16 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 12
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4080
- Power
- 302 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- November 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 302 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
How Nvidia RTX 4080 earns renting on the AI GPU marketplace
| Provider | GPU | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.270/h ·
1 offer
|
$6.03
|
$0.64 |
$5.39
★
Visit →
|
|
Tensordock
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.150/h ·
2 offers
|
$2.88
|
$0.64 |
$2.24
Visit →
|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.068/h ·
10 offers
|
$1.38
844 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00164
|
$0.64 |
$0.74
Visit →
|
Nvidia RTX 4080 earns $5.39/day renting to AI workloads — meaningfully more than the $-0.33/day it would make mining NexaPoW. Mining and rental are mutually exclusive use modes, so the AI marketplace is the obvious play here.
| Market | Algorithm | Profit /day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002188 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.31 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006829 BTC/M/d
|
$0.33
★
$0.97 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$4.04
★
$4.68 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$1.03
$1.67 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003164 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
$0.11 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.42 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.52 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000023958 BTC/M/d
|
$0.19
$0.83 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000679 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.58
$0.06 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.67 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.13
★
$0.77 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.03
$0.67 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005654 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.18 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.34 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.04
★
$0.60 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012422 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.39 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000505 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.60
$0.04 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.54
★
$0.10 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.13 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001222 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.54
$0.10 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.13 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000544 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.57
★
$0.07 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000048 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
$0.01 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
25% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000054 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
★
$0.01 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000072 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
★
$0.01 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000073 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
$0.01 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000176 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263777 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
ROI calculator for Nvidia RTX 4080
Model payback, electricity, and first-year return for this rig.
The line crosses $0 on the day you break even. Everything above is pure profit.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Yearly emissions by energy source
Based on the rig's annual power draw and the carbon intensity of common grid mixes.
| Energy source | CO₂e / yr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 25.19 kg |
| Nuclear | 27.48 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 54.95 kg |
| Geothermal | 87.0 kg |
| Solar | 103.03 kg |
| Biofuels | 526.61 kg |
| Gas | 1,121.9 kg |
| Coal | 1,877.47 kg |
Estimates only — actual emissions vary by hardware, cooling, and grid mix.
What does that actually mean?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4080 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,088 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Where you plug in matters
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4080's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,877 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 55 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
How to reduce this rig's footprint
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Frequently asked questions
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Daily projection RENTAL
| Period | /Day | /Month |
|---|---|---|
| Income | $6.03 | $180.79 |
|
Cost
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.64 | $19.20 |
| Profit | $5.39 | $161.71 |
| Provider | GPU | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.270/h ·
1 offer
|
$6.03
|
$0.64 |
$5.39
★
Visit →
|
|
Tensordock
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.150/h ·
2 offers
|
$2.88
|
$0.64 |
$2.24
Visit →
|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.068/h ·
10 offers
|
$1.38
844 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00164
|
$0.64 |
$0.74
Visit →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
120Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
189Mh · 265.0W
|
$0.31 | $0.64 | $-0.33 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42.0406Mh · 302.0W
|
$0.18 | $0.72 | $-0.54 |
|
—
|
Ethash
85Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
125Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
171.2Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.34 | $-0.27 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
110Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.43 | $-0.37 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
14Hh · 180.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.43 | $-0.40 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
189Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.4378Gh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
115Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
46.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
8.7Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.65Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
87.0Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
1.2Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
48.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 2210 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2510 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 9728
- GPU Power
- 320 W
- Max Memory Size
- 16 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 12
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4080
- Power
- 302 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- November 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 302 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
How Nvidia RTX 4080 earns renting on the AI GPU marketplace
| Provider | GPU | Income | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.270/h ·
1 offer
|
$6.03
|
$0.64 |
$5.39
★
Visit →
|
|
Tensordock
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.150/h ·
2 offers
|
$2.88
|
$0.64 |
$2.24
Visit →
|
|
CL
Clore Ai
GPU marketplace
|
RTX 4080
$0.068/h ·
10 offers
|
$1.38
844 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00164
|
$0.64 |
$0.74
Visit →
|
Nvidia RTX 4080 earns $5.39/day renting to AI workloads — meaningfully more than the $-0.33/day it would make mining NexaPoW. Mining and rental are mutually exclusive use modes, so the AI marketplace is the obvious play here.
| Market | Algorithm | Profit /day | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002188 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.31 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006829 BTC/M/d
|
$0.33
★
$0.97 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$4.04
★
$4.68 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$1.03
$1.67 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003164 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
$0.11 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.42 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.52 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000023958 BTC/M/d
|
$0.19
$0.83 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000679 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.58
$0.06 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.67 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.13
★
$0.77 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.03
$0.67 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005654 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.18 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.34 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.04
★
$0.60 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012422 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.25
$0.39 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000505 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.60
$0.04 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.54
★
$0.10 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.13 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001222 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.54
$0.10 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.13 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000544 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.57
★
$0.07 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000048 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
$0.01 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
25% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000054 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
★
$0.01 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000072 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
★
$0.01 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000073 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
$0.01 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000176 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263777 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
Visit →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 income · $0.64 cost
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
ROI calculator for Nvidia RTX 4080
Model payback, electricity, and first-year return for this rig.
The line crosses $0 on the day you break even. Everything above is pure profit.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Yearly emissions by energy source
Based on the rig's annual power draw and the carbon intensity of common grid mixes.
| Energy source | CO₂e / yr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 25.19 kg |
| Nuclear | 27.48 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 54.95 kg |
| Geothermal | 87.0 kg |
| Solar | 103.03 kg |
| Biofuels | 526.61 kg |
| Gas | 1,121.9 kg |
| Coal | 1,877.47 kg |
Estimates only — actual emissions vary by hardware, cooling, and grid mix.
What does that actually mean?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4080 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,088 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Where you plug in matters
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4080's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,877 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 55 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
How to reduce this rig's footprint
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Frequently asked questions
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.