LP Agent
Nvidia RTX 4080
Nvidia RTX 4080 earns $5.39 per day renting on the AI GPU marketplace at a median rate of $0.25/h, drawing 180W. At $0.1/kWh electricity, the daily power cost is $0.64.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $6.03 | $180.79 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.64 | $19.20 |
| 利润 | $5.39 | $161.71 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
120Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
189Mh · 265.0W
|
$0.31 | $0.64 | $-0.33 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42.0406Mh · 302.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.72 | $-0.53 |
|
—
|
Ethash
85Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
125Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
171.2Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.34 | $-0.26 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
110Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.43 | $-0.37 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
14Hh · 180.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.43 | $-0.40 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
189Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.4378Gh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
115Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
46.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
8.7Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.65Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
87.0Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
1.2Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
48.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 2210 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2510 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 9728
- GPU Power
- 320 W
- Max Memory Size
- 16 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 12
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4080
- Power
- 302 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- November 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 302 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia RTX 4080 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
Nvidia RTX 4080 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $5.39,明显超过挖 NexaPoW 的 $-0.33/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002174 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.31 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006365 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.91 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$4.06
★
$4.70 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$1.03
$1.67 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003167 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
$0.11 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.42 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.52 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024894 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
$0.87 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000700 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.57
$0.07 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.67 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.13
★
$0.77 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.03
$0.67 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005619 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.18 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.34 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013186 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.42 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012423 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.40 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.60
$0.04 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
3% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.54
★
$0.10 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.13 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001213 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.54
$0.10 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.13 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000586 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.56
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000047 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000067 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
$0.01 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000063 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
$0.01 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000261920 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4080 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 25.19 kg |
| Nuclear | 27.48 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 54.95 kg |
| Geothermal | 87.0 kg |
| Solar | 103.03 kg |
| Biofuels | 526.61 kg |
| Gas | 1,121.9 kg |
| Coal | 1,877.47 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4080 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,088 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4080's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,877 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 55 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $6.03 | $180.79 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.64 | $19.20 |
| 利润 | $5.39 | $161.71 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
120Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
189Mh · 265.0W
|
$0.31 | $0.64 | $-0.33 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42.0406Mh · 302.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.72 | $-0.53 |
|
—
|
Ethash
85Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
125Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
171.2Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.34 | $-0.26 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
110Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.43 | $-0.37 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
14Hh · 180.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.43 | $-0.40 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
189Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.4378Gh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
115Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
46.0Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
8.7Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.65Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
87.0Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
1.2Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
48.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 2210 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2510 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 9728
- GPU Power
- 320 W
- Max Memory Size
- 16 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 12
- Model
- Nvidia RTX 4080
- Power
- 302 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- November 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 302 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia RTX 4080 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
Nvidia RTX 4080 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $5.39,明显超过挖 NexaPoW 的 $-0.33/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002174 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.31 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006365 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.91 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$4.06
★
$4.70 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$1.03
$1.67 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003167 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.53
$0.11 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.42 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.52 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024894 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
$0.87 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000700 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.57
$0.07 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.03
★
$0.67 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.13
★
$0.77 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.03
$0.67 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005619 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.18 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.34 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013186 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
★
$0.42 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012423 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.40 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.60
$0.04 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
3% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.54
★
$0.10 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.13 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001213 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.54
$0.10 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.51
★
$0.13 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000586 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.56
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000047 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000067 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
$0.01 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000063 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.63
$0.01 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000261920 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.64
$0.00 收入 · $0.64 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4080 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 25.19 kg |
| Nuclear | 27.48 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 54.95 kg |
| Geothermal | 87.0 kg |
| Solar | 103.03 kg |
| Biofuels | 526.61 kg |
| Gas | 1,121.9 kg |
| Coal | 1,877.47 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4080 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,088 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4080's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,877 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 55 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.