AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB — 挖矿
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB 每天净赚 $0.27 挖 Octopus 算力 34.0 Mh/s 功耗 100.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情有利润。
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB 挖 Octopus 效率最高。本页包含完整的算法排行榜、联合挖矿选项、推荐矿池,以及可点击任意一行切换的历史收益图表。
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.51 | $15.20 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.24 | $7.20 |
| 利润 | $0.27 | $8.00 |
算法收益历史 ▶ Octopus
若以 $0.1/kWh 持续挖该算法,每日净收益 $/天。点击上方任意算法可切换。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.51 | $15.30 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.24 | $7.20 |
| 利润 | $0.27 | $8.10 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
34.0Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.51 | $0.24 | $0.27 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
23.3Mh · 155.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.37 | $-0.23 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
40Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.24 | $-0.21 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
40.5Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.24 | $-0.22 |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
18.0Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
57.0Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
7.5Gh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
930.0Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
46.0Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
40Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
13.5Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
22.0Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
22.0Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
4.7Hh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
40.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
23.0Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000007541 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
$0.14 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012997 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0050
$0.25 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000026852 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.51 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012322 BTC/M/d
|
—
$0.23 收入 · $0.24 成本
|
|||
Octopus
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003664 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
$0.10 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002148 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.17
$0.07 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003145 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.06 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000001011 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
$0.03 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.04 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001711 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.06 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001333 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.04 收入 · $0.24 成本
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.05 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.25 | $7.35 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.24 | $7.20 |
| 利润 | $0.01 | $0.15 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 9.5 kg |
| Nuclear | 10.37 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 20.74 kg |
| Geothermal | 32.83 kg |
| Solar | 38.88 kg |
| Biofuels | 198.72 kg |
| Gas | 423.36 kg |
| Coal | 708.48 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 410 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 708 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 21 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.51 | $15.20 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.24 | $7.20 |
| 利润 | $0.27 | $8.00 |
算法收益历史 ▶ Octopus
若以 $0.1/kWh 持续挖该算法,每日净收益 $/天。点击上方任意算法可切换。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.51 | $15.30 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.24 | $7.20 |
| 利润 | $0.27 | $8.10 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
34.0Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.51 | $0.24 | $0.27 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
23.3Mh · 155.0W
|
$0.14 | $0.37 | $-0.23 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
40Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.24 | $-0.21 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
40.5Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.24 | $-0.22 |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
18.0Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
57.0Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
7.5Gh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
930.0Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
46.0Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
40Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
13.5Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
22.0Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
22.0Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
4.7Hh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
40.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
23.0Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000007541 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.10
$0.14 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
9% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012997 BTC/M/d
|
$0.0050
$0.25 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000026852 BTC/M/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.51 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012322 BTC/M/d
|
—
$0.23 收入 · $0.24 成本
|
|||
Octopus
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003664 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
$0.10 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
NexaPoW
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002148 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.17
$0.07 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
FishHash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003145 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.06 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000001011 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
$0.03 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.04 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001711 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.06 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001333 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.04 收入 · $0.24 成本
|
|||
|
Ethash
|
|||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.05 收入 · $0.24 成本
访问 →
|
|||
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.25 | $7.35 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.24 | $7.20 |
| 利润 | $0.01 | $0.15 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 9.5 kg |
| Nuclear | 10.37 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 20.74 kg |
| Geothermal | 32.83 kg |
| Solar | 38.88 kg |
| Biofuels | 198.72 kg |
| Gas | 423.36 kg |
| Coal | 708.48 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 410 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 708 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 21 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.