LP Agent
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB — 回本周期
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB 每天净赚 最高 $2.57,最佳为挖 Cuckatoo32 算力 8.5 Hh/s。 也可用于:出售 KAWPOW 算力($-0.09/天)。 功耗 170 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 7 个区块 回本周期 6/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.98 | $89.48 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| 利润 | $2.57 | $77.18 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
此页面是否有帮助?
感谢您的反馈!
还有什么想告诉我们?表单已在下方打开。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.98 | $89.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| 利润 | $2.57 | $77.10 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
★ 最佳
8.5 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$2.57 |
|
FIS
FishHash
34.0 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$2.00 |
|
OCT
Octopus
75.0 Mh/s · 170.0 W
|
$0.76 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
89 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$0.10 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
77.5 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$0.04 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
33.4 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
124.3 Mh/s · 146.0 W
|
$-0.35 |
|
ETC
Etchash
64 Mh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
8 Hh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.39 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
800 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
EQU
EquihashZEL
65 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
18.0 Gh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
BLA
Blake3
33.0 Hh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
ETH
Ethash
64 Mh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
8.5Hh · 170.0W
|
$2.98 | $0.41 | $2.57 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
34.0Mh · 220.0W
|
$2.41 | $0.53 | $1.88 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
75.0Mh · 170.0W
|
$1.17 | $0.41 | $0.76 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
89Hh · 170.0W
|
$0.51 | $0.41 | $0.10 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
77.5Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.45 | $0.36 | $0.09 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
33.4Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.48 | $-0.35 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
124.3Mh · 146.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.35 | $-0.29 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
64Mh · 160.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.38 | $-0.34 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
8Hh · 210.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.50 | $-0.48 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
800Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
41.0Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
65Hh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
65.0Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
18.0Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
62.0Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.15Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
33.0Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
37.0Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
4.4Gh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
6.3Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
64Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
1.85Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
36.0Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.32 | $9.49 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| 利润 | $-0.09 | $-2.81 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.11/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.16 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.63 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.25 kg |
| Geothermal | 55.81 kg |
| Solar | 66.1 kg |
| Biofuels | 337.82 kg |
| Gas | 719.71 kg |
| Coal | 1,204.42 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 698 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,204 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 35 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 7 个区块 回本周期 6/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.98 | $89.48 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| 利润 | $2.57 | $77.18 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.98 | $89.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| 利润 | $2.57 | $77.10 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
★ 最佳
8.5 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$2.57 |
|
FIS
FishHash
34.0 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$2.00 |
|
OCT
Octopus
75.0 Mh/s · 170.0 W
|
$0.76 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
89 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$0.10 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
77.5 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$0.04 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
33.4 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
124.3 Mh/s · 146.0 W
|
$-0.35 |
|
ETC
Etchash
64 Mh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
8 Hh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.39 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
800 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
EQU
EquihashZEL
65 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
18.0 Gh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
BLA
Blake3
33.0 Hh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
ETH
Ethash
64 Mh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
8.5Hh · 170.0W
|
$2.98 | $0.41 | $2.57 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
34.0Mh · 220.0W
|
$2.41 | $0.53 | $1.88 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
75.0Mh · 170.0W
|
$1.17 | $0.41 | $0.76 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
89Hh · 170.0W
|
$0.51 | $0.41 | $0.10 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
77.5Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.45 | $0.36 | $0.09 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
33.4Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.48 | $-0.35 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
124.3Mh · 146.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.35 | $-0.29 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
64Mh · 160.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.38 | $-0.34 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
8Hh · 210.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.50 | $-0.48 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
800Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
41.0Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
65Hh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
65.0Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
18.0Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
62.0Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.15Gh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
33.0Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
37.0Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
4.4Gh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
6.3Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
64Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
1.85Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
36.0Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.32 | $9.49 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| 利润 | $-0.09 | $-2.81 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.11/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.16 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.63 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.25 kg |
| Geothermal | 55.81 kg |
| Solar | 66.1 kg |
| Biofuels | 337.82 kg |
| Gas | 719.71 kg |
| Coal | 1,204.42 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 698 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,204 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 35 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.