LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock 每天净赚 $0.22 挖 Octopus 算力 44 Mh/s 功耗 115.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情有利润。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.50 | $14.97 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.28 | $8.40 |
| 利润 | $0.22 | $6.69 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
44Mh · 115.0W
|
$0.50 | $0.28 | $0.22 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.45Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1.2Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
22Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.34 | $-0.26 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
47Mh · 85.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.20 | $-0.12 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
22Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.34 | $-0.26 |
|
—
|
Ethash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
115Mh · 110.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.26 | $-0.21 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
44Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.29 | $-0.26 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
7Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.34 | $-0.33 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
61Hh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
800Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
420Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
350Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.15Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
21.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
850Kh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ampere
- Model
- GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock
- Power
- 140 W
- Process
- 8 nm
- Release
- 2020
- Release year
- 2020
- TDP
- 140 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002987 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.10 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.37 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$1.86
★
$2.14 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000015393 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
$0.51 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002181 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.08 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006391 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.23 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$0.89
★
$1.17 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.14
$0.42 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000719 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.26
$0.02 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.04
★
$0.24 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
—
★
$0.27 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.04
$0.24 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005601 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.09 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000009990 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013130 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
★
$0.22 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012454 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.07
$0.21 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000534 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.26
$0.02 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001507 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001231 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.04 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000584 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000047 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
17% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000068 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000260788 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000188 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000050724 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
18% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068900 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000078160 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000069060 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 10.93 kg |
| Nuclear | 11.92 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 23.85 kg |
| Geothermal | 37.76 kg |
| Solar | 44.71 kg |
| Biofuels | 228.53 kg |
| Gas | 486.86 kg |
| Coal | 814.75 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock running 24/7 for a year releases about 472 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock's annual footprint swings from roughly 815 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 24 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.50 | $14.97 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.28 | $8.40 |
| 利润 | $0.22 | $6.69 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
44Mh · 115.0W
|
$0.50 | $0.28 | $0.22 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.45Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1.2Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
22Mh · 140.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.34 | $-0.26 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
47Mh · 85.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.20 | $-0.12 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
22Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.34 | $-0.26 |
|
—
|
Ethash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
115Mh · 110.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.26 | $-0.21 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
44Hh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
48Mh · 120.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.29 | $-0.26 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
7Hh · 140.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.34 | $-0.33 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
61Hh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
800Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
420Mh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
350Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
20.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.15Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
21.5Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
22Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
2.6Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
850Kh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
- Architecture
- Ampere
- Model
- GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock
- Power
- 140 W
- Process
- 8 nm
- Release
- 2020
- Release year
- 2020
- TDP
- 140 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002987 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.10 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.37 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$1.86
★
$2.14 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000015393 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
$0.51 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002181 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.08 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006391 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.23 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$0.89
★
$1.17 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.14
$0.42 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000719 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.26
$0.02 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.04
★
$0.24 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
—
★
$0.27 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.04
$0.24 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005601 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.19
$0.09 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000009990 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013130 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
★
$0.22 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012454 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.07
$0.21 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.21
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000534 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.26
$0.02 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001507 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001231 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.04 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000584 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000047 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
17% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000068 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000260788 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000188 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000050724 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
18% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068900 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000078160 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000069060 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.28
$0.00 收入 · $0.28 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 10.93 kg |
| Nuclear | 11.92 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 23.85 kg |
| Geothermal | 37.76 kg |
| Solar | 44.71 kg |
| Biofuels | 228.53 kg |
| Gas | 486.86 kg |
| Coal | 814.75 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock running 24/7 for a year releases about 472 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Full Unlock's annual footprint swings from roughly 815 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 24 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.