LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 — 挖矿盈利模拟器
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 每天净赚 最高 $23.95,最佳为 AI 出租 $1.03/小时,共 135 个挂单。 也可用于:挖 FishHash 算力 160.0 Mh/s($11.28/天) and 出售 FishHash 算力($0.79/天)。 功耗 290 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 8 个区块 挖矿盈利模拟器 5/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $17.92 | $537.54 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $17.22 | $516.54 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $11.98 | $359.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $11.28 | $338.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
FIS
FishHash
★ 最佳
160.0 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$11.28 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
360 Mh/s · 400.0 W
|
$1.21 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
190 Hh/s · 280.0 W
|
$0.96 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
580 Mh/s · 310.0 W
|
$-0.40 |
|
ETC
Etchash
160 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
130 Kh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
160 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
48.0 Gh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
BLA
Blake3
7.5 Gh/s · 400.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
ETH
Ethash
28.5 hh/s · 390.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
160.0Mh · 290.0W
|
$11.98 | $0.70 | $11.28 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
360Mh · 400.0W
|
$1.91 | $0.96 | $0.95 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
190Hh · 280.0W
|
$1.66 | $0.67 | $0.99 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
580Mh · 310.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.74 | $-0.44 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
160Mh · 290.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.70 | $-0.60 |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
130Kh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
160Mh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
85Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
48.0Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
7.5Gh · 400.0W
|
— | $0.96 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
28.5hh · 390.0W
|
— | $0.94 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
1miner.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
6
666pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
A
aikapool.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
A
antpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
baikalmine.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
bitsolo.me
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
btcz.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cloverpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
coolpool.top
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cruxpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
emcd.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
epic.iniaku.my.id
|
ProgPow (EPIC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
epicmine.io
|
ProgPow (EPIC) | — | Visit → |
erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.herominers.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.nanopool.org
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
etc.2miners.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.crazypool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
etc.herominers.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
etc.molepool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.pool2mine.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.solopool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
ethcore.ru
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ethereum-classic.miningpoolhub.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
eu.go-poolmining.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
F
f2pool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
fenixpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
G
gtpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashbay.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
★
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
himpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
hiveon.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
I
ironfish.herominers.com
|
FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
J
jjpool.fr
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
k1pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
K
korvexpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
L
l6pool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
L
longpool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
M
m2pool.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
M
minepoolis.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
M
moneroocean.stream
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
nexa.2miners.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nexa.acc-pool.pw
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nushypool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
O
okminer.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.binance.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
pool.rplant.xyz
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
P
poolin.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pooly.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rockpool.cloud
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
sigmanauts.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
S
skypool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
solo-erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
solo-etc.2miners.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
solo-nexa.2miners.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.nexa.acc-pool.pw
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
S
spiderpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
S
swgroupe.fr
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
tpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tw-pool.com
|
FishHash (IRON) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
V
viabtc.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
W
woolypooly.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
X
xsg.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zk.work
|
FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zpool.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $24.65 | $739.50 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $23.95 | $718.50 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$1.208/h ·
136 个报价
|
$24.65
11,117 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00222
|
$0.70 |
$23.95
★
访问 →
|
Io Net
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.850/h ·
10 个报价
|
$16.32
|
$0.70 |
$15.62
访问 →
|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.690/h ·
1 个报价
|
$15.40
|
$0.70 |
$14.70
访问 →
|
Tensordock
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.540/h ·
5 个报价
|
$10.37
|
$0.70 |
$9.67
访问 →
|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.336/h ·
1 个报价
|
$6.84
|
$0.70 |
$6.14
访问 →
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.000/h ·
22 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.70 |
$-0.70
访问 →
|
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $23.95/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.49 | $44.77 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $0.79 | $23.77 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 27.56 kg |
| Nuclear | 30.07 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 60.13 kg |
| Geothermal | 95.21 kg |
| Solar | 112.75 kg |
| Biofuels | 576.29 kg |
| Gas | 1,227.74 kg |
| Coal | 2,054.59 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,190 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,055 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 60 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 8 个区块 挖矿盈利模拟器 5/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $17.92 | $537.54 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $17.22 | $516.54 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $11.98 | $359.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $11.28 | $338.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
FIS
FishHash
★ 最佳
160.0 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$11.28 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
360 Mh/s · 400.0 W
|
$1.21 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
190 Hh/s · 280.0 W
|
$0.96 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
580 Mh/s · 310.0 W
|
$-0.40 |
|
ETC
Etchash
160 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
130 Kh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
160 Mh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
48.0 Gh/s · 300.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
BLA
Blake3
7.5 Gh/s · 400.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
ETH
Ethash
28.5 hh/s · 390.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
160.0Mh · 290.0W
|
$11.98 | $0.70 | $11.28 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
360Mh · 400.0W
|
$1.91 | $0.96 | $0.95 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
190Hh · 280.0W
|
$1.66 | $0.67 | $0.99 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
580Mh · 310.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.74 | $-0.44 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
160Mh · 290.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.70 | $-0.60 |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
130Kh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
160Mh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
85Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
48.0Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
7.5Gh · 400.0W
|
— | $0.96 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
28.5hh · 390.0W
|
— | $0.94 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
1miner.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
6
666pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
A
aikapool.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
A
antpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
baikalmine.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
bitsolo.me
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
B
btcz.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cloverpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
coolpool.top
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cruxpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
emcd.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
epic.iniaku.my.id
|
ProgPow (EPIC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
epicmine.io
|
ProgPow (EPIC) | — | Visit → |
erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.herominers.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.nanopool.org
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
etc.2miners.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.crazypool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
etc.herominers.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
etc.molepool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.pool2mine.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
etc.solopool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
ethcore.ru
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ethereum-classic.miningpoolhub.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
E
eu.go-poolmining.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
F
f2pool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
fenixpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
G
gtpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashbay.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
★
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
himpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
hiveon.net
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
I
ironfish.herominers.com
|
FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
J
jjpool.fr
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
k1pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
K
korvexpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
L
l6pool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
L
longpool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
M
m2pool.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
M
minepoolis.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
M
moneroocean.stream
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
nexa.2miners.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nexa.acc-pool.pw
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nushypool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
O
okminer.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.binance.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
pool.rplant.xyz
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
P
poolin.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pooly.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rockpool.cloud
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
S
sigmanauts.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
S
skypool.org
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
solo-erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
solo-etc.2miners.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
solo-nexa.2miners.com
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.nexa.acc-pool.pw
|
NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
S
spiderpool.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
S
swgroupe.fr
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
tpool.io
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tw-pool.com
|
FishHash (IRON) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
V
viabtc.com
|
Etchash (ETC) | — | Visit → |
|
W
woolypooly.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
|
X
xsg.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zk.work
|
FishHash (IRON) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zpool.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $24.65 | $739.50 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $23.95 | $718.50 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$1.208/h ·
136 个报价
|
$24.65
11,117 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00222
|
$0.70 |
$23.95
★
访问 →
|
Io Net
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.850/h ·
10 个报价
|
$16.32
|
$0.70 |
$15.62
访问 →
|
RunPod
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.690/h ·
1 个报价
|
$15.40
|
$0.70 |
$14.70
访问 →
|
Tensordock
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.540/h ·
5 个报价
|
$10.37
|
$0.70 |
$9.67
访问 →
|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.336/h ·
1 个报价
|
$6.84
|
$0.70 |
$6.14
访问 →
|
Akash
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5090
$0.000/h ·
22 个报价
|
$0.00
|
$0.70 |
$-0.70
访问 →
|
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $23.95/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.49 | $44.77 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.70 | $21.00 |
| 利润 | $0.79 | $23.77 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 27.56 kg |
| Nuclear | 30.07 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 60.13 kg |
| Geothermal | 95.21 kg |
| Solar | 112.75 kg |
| Biofuels | 576.29 kg |
| Gas | 1,227.74 kg |
| Coal | 2,054.59 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,190 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,055 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 60 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.