LP Agent
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 每天净赚 $0.26 挖 Octopus 算力 65 Mh/s 功耗 200.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情有利润。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.74 | $22.05 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| 利润 | $0.26 | $7.65 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
65Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.74 | $0.48 | $0.26 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.9Hh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
48Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.21 | $0.53 | $-0.32 |
|
—
|
Ethash
80Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
68Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.41 | $-0.30 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
150Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.36 | $-0.30 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
18Hh · 120.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.29 | $-0.23 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
62Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
80Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.36 | $-0.32 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4.2Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.53 | $-0.52 |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
11Gh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.1Gh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
750Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
550Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
27Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
27Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
1.85Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
18.0Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
11Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
960Kh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
6.3Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
42Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
33Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- RDNA 2
- Base Clock
- 1825 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2250 MHz
- Compute Units
- 80
- GPU Power
- 300 W
- Max Memory Size
- 16 GB
- Memory Bandwidth
- 512 GB/s
- Memory Type
- GDDR6
- Mining algos
- 32
- Model
- Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Power
- 260 W
- Process
- 7 nm
- Release
- December 2020
- Release year
- 2020
- TDP
- 260 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- AMD
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002978 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.15 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.54 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$2.68
★
$3.16 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014879 BTC/M/d
|
$0.25
$0.73 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002179 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.11 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006560 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.34 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$1.21
★
$1.69 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.12
$0.60 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005613 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
$0.20 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
★
$0.39 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$0.20
★
$0.68 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012435 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
$0.45 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003171 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.08 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.17
★
$0.31 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
★
$0.39 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024279 BTC/M/d
|
$0.15
$0.63 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000693 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.45
$0.03 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.33 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.38 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.15
$0.33 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000501 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.45
$0.03 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
10% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001625 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
★
$0.10 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001394 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.08 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000546 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263149 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000179 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000050023 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
19% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000076980 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000070810 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 19.01 kg |
| Nuclear | 20.74 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 41.47 kg |
| Geothermal | 65.66 kg |
| Solar | 77.76 kg |
| Biofuels | 397.44 kg |
| Gas | 846.72 kg |
| Coal | 1,416.96 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 821 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,417 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 41 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.74 | $22.05 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.48 | $14.40 |
| 利润 | $0.26 | $7.65 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
65Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.74 | $0.48 | $0.26 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.9Hh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
48Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.21 | $0.53 | $-0.32 |
|
—
|
Ethash
80Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
68Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.41 | $-0.30 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
150Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.36 | $-0.30 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
18Hh · 120.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.29 | $-0.23 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
62Hh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
80Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.36 | $-0.32 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4.2Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.53 | $-0.52 |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
11Gh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.1Gh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
750Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
550Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
27Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
27Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
1.85Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
18.0Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
11Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
960Kh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
6.3Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
42Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
33Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
- Architecture
- RDNA 2
- Base Clock
- 1825 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2250 MHz
- Compute Units
- 80
- GPU Power
- 300 W
- Max Memory Size
- 16 GB
- Memory Bandwidth
- 512 GB/s
- Memory Type
- GDDR6
- Mining algos
- 32
- Model
- Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Power
- 260 W
- Process
- 7 nm
- Release
- December 2020
- Release year
- 2020
- TDP
- 260 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- AMD
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002978 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
$0.15 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.06
★
$0.54 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$2.68
★
$3.16 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014879 BTC/M/d
|
$0.25
$0.73 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002179 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.11 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006560 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.34 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$1.21
★
$1.69 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.12
$0.60 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005613 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
$0.20 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
★
$0.39 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$0.20
★
$0.68 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012435 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.03
$0.45 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003171 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.08 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.17
★
$0.31 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.09
★
$0.39 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024279 BTC/M/d
|
$0.15
$0.63 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000693 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.45
$0.03 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.33 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.10
★
$0.38 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.15
$0.33 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000501 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.45
$0.03 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
10% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001625 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
★
$0.10 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001394 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.08 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000546 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263149 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000179 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000050023 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
19% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000076980 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000070810 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.48
$0.00 收入 · $0.48 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 19.01 kg |
| Nuclear | 20.74 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 41.47 kg |
| Geothermal | 65.66 kg |
| Solar | 77.76 kg |
| Biofuels | 397.44 kg |
| Gas | 846.72 kg |
| Coal | 1,416.96 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 821 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,417 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 41 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.