LP Agent
AMD RX 6650 XT — 加密货币挖矿
AMD RX 6650 XT 每天净亏 最高 $0.22,最佳为出售 KAWPOW 算力。 也可用于:挖 KAWPOW 算力 16.1754 Mh/s($-0.28/天)。 功耗 157 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情暂未回本。
点击切换 · 7 个区块 加密货币挖矿 2/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.16 | $4.77 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| 利润 | $-0.22 | $-6.63 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
LP Agent
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.10 | $3.00 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| 利润 | $-0.28 | $-8.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
KAW
KAWPOW
★ 最佳
16.1754 Mh/s · 157.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
48.644 Mh/s · 99.0 W
|
$-0.35 |
|
ETC
Etchash
25.47 Mh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.36 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
53.2468 Mh/s · 155.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
3.8253 Mh/s · 69.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
360.448 Mh/s · 154.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
VER
VerusHash
6.8455 Mh/s · 127.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
17.1544 Mh/s · 156.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
19.503 Hh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
X16
X16R
17.8611 Mh/s · 156.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
ETH
Ethash
25.47 Mh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.6068 Gh/s · 51.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
722.603 Mh/s · 143.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
129.288 Hh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
16.1754Mh · 157.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.38 | $-0.28 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
48.644Mh · 99.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.24 | $-0.21 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
25.47Mh · 66.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.16 | $-0.14 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
53.2468Mh · 155.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.37 | $-0.36 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
3.8253Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
360.448Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
6.8455Mh · 127.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
16.6799Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
3.1429Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
11.7941Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
783Hh · 104.0W
|
— | $0.25 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
372.5145Kh · 97.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
17.1544Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
653.9427Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
1.9517Gh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
19.503Hh · 66.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
17.8611Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
12.1299Mh · 58.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
16.7152Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
BMW512
1.5068Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
32.924Hh · 65.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
25.47Mh · 66.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.6068Gh · 51.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
722.603Mh · 143.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
129.288Hh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
31.8178Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.9125Mh · 40.0W
|
— | $0.10 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
16.6392Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
C11
14.6807Mh · 53.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
427.1167Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
22.5Hh · 131.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
17.9245Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
90.8062Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.16 | $4.77 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| 利润 | $-0.22 | $-6.63 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $-0.11/day
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD RX 6650 XT 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 14.92 kg |
| Nuclear | 16.28 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 32.56 kg |
| Geothermal | 51.55 kg |
| Solar | 61.04 kg |
| Biofuels | 311.99 kg |
| Gas | 664.68 kg |
| Coal | 1,112.31 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 6650 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 644 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 6650 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,112 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 33 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 7 个区块 加密货币挖矿 2/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.16 | $4.77 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| 利润 | $-0.22 | $-6.63 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.10 | $3.00 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| 利润 | $-0.28 | $-8.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
KAW
KAWPOW
★ 最佳
16.1754 Mh/s · 157.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
48.644 Mh/s · 99.0 W
|
$-0.35 |
|
ETC
Etchash
25.47 Mh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.36 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
53.2468 Mh/s · 155.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
3.8253 Mh/s · 69.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
360.448 Mh/s · 154.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
VER
VerusHash
6.8455 Mh/s · 127.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
17.1544 Mh/s · 156.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
19.503 Hh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
X16
X16R
17.8611 Mh/s · 156.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
ETH
Ethash
25.47 Mh/s · 66.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.6068 Gh/s · 51.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
722.603 Mh/s · 143.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
129.288 Hh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
16.1754Mh · 157.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.38 | $-0.28 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
48.644Mh · 99.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.24 | $-0.21 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
25.47Mh · 66.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.16 | $-0.14 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
53.2468Mh · 155.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.37 | $-0.36 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
3.8253Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
360.448Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
6.8455Mh · 127.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
16.6799Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
3.1429Mh · 59.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
11.7941Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
783Hh · 104.0W
|
— | $0.25 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
372.5145Kh · 97.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
17.1544Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
653.9427Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
1.9517Gh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
19.503Hh · 66.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
17.8611Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
12.1299Mh · 58.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
16.7152Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
BMW512
1.5068Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
32.924Hh · 65.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
25.47Mh · 66.0W
|
— | $0.16 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.6068Gh · 51.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
722.603Mh · 143.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
129.288Hh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
31.8178Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.9125Mh · 40.0W
|
— | $0.10 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
16.6392Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
C11
14.6807Mh · 53.0W
|
— | $0.13 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
427.1167Mh · 156.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
22.5Hh · 131.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
17.9245Mh · 155.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
90.8062Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.16 | $4.77 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.38 | $11.40 |
| 利润 | $-0.22 | $-6.63 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $-0.11/day
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD RX 6650 XT 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 14.92 kg |
| Nuclear | 16.28 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 32.56 kg |
| Geothermal | 51.55 kg |
| Solar | 61.04 kg |
| Biofuels | 311.99 kg |
| Gas | 664.68 kg |
| Coal | 1,112.31 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 6650 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 644 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 6650 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,112 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 33 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.