LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti — Hashrate-Markt
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti verdient bis zu $5.19 pro Tag, am besten als KI-Vermietung zu $0.25/h bei 1 Angebot. Auch verfügbar: Octopus-Mining bei 122 Mh/s ($1.11/Tag) and KAWPOW-Hashpower-Verkauf ($-0.28/Tag). Zieht 350 W aus der Steckdose — bei $0.10/kWh, bei heutigen Preisen profitabel.
Tippen zum Wechseln · 8 Abschnitte Hashrate-Markt 4/8
Tägliche Prognose
Tägliche Sieger-Streams — gemittelt aus dem aufgezeichneten Verlauf des Rigs bei $0.1/kWh
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $4.67 | $140.11 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.84 | $25.20 |
| Gewinn | $3.83 | $114.91 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
War diese Seite hilfreich?
Danke für das Feedback!
Noch etwas, das wir wissen sollten? Das Formular ist unten geöffnet.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
Mining-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $1.95 | $58.50 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.84 | $25.20 |
| Gewinn | $1.11 | $33.30 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Algorithmus | Netto / Tag |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ Bester
122 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$1.11 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
157 Hh/s · 330.0 W
|
$0.06 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
134 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.07 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.3 Hh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
55 Mh/s · 377.0 W
|
$-0.62 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
285 Mh/s · 450.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
ETC
Etchash
128 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.76 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
16 Hh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.80 |
|
EQU
Equihash
149.5 Hh/s · 285.0 W
|
$-0.83 |
|
IRO
IronFish
22 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.83 |
|
SHA
Sha256
1.2 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
FIS
FishHash
81 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
BLA
Blake3
2.4 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
ETH
Ethash
125 Mh/s · 450.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
52 Kh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
8 Gh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
1.65 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
470 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
53 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
125 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
MER
Meraki
128 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
7.9 Kh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
QHA
Qhash
210 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
TON
Ton
5.5 Gh/s · 420.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
10.9 Hh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
157.0 hh/s · 330.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
EQU
EquihashZEL
89 Hh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
6.6 Hh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
122Mh · 350.0W
|
$1.95 | $0.84 | $1.11 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
157Hh · 330.0W
|
$0.90 | $0.79 | $0.11 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
134Mh · 230.0W
|
$0.77 | $0.55 | $0.22 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.3Hh · 380.0W
|
$0.47 | $0.91 | $-0.44 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
55Mh · 377.0W
|
$0.22 | $0.90 | $-0.68 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
285Mh · 450.0W
|
$0.14 | $1.08 | $-0.94 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
128Mh · 350.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.84 | $-0.76 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
16Hh · 380.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.91 | $-0.87 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
149.5Hh · 285.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.68 | $-0.67 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
22Gh · 140.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.34 | $-0.33 |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.2Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
24Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
2.4Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
50.0Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
1.9Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
105Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
125Mh · 450.0W
|
— | $1.08 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
52Kh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
8Gh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
600Kh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.65Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
470Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
53Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
125Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
128Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
7.9Kh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
210Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
5.5Gh · 420.0W
|
— | $1.01 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
10.9Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
53Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
157.0hh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
81.0Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
6.3Hh · 310.0W
|
— | $0.74 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
89Hh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
49Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
6.6Hh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
1.9Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
510.0Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
53Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
| Pool | Unterstützte Algos | Gebühr | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Verlauf der Netto-Mieteinnahmen
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $6.03 | $180.90 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.84 | $25.20 |
| Gewinn | $5.19 | $155.70 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Anbieter | GPU | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU-Marktplatz
|
RTX 3090 Ti
$0.270/h ·
1 Angebot
|
$6.03
|
$0.84 |
$5.19
★
Besuchen →
|
Clore Ai
GPU-Marktplatz
|
RTX 3090 Ti
$0.162/h ·
4 Angebote
|
$3.31
1,520 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00218
|
$0.84 |
$2.47
Besuchen →
|
Einnahmenfluss So verdient Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti auf dem KI-GPU-Marktplatz how we got $5.19/day · ▾
Hashmarket-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.56 | $16.75 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.84 | $25.20 |
| Gewinn | $-0.28 | $-8.45 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Markt | Bestes Netto / Tag | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$-0.43 | Besuchen → |
MRR
|
$0.01 | Besuchen → |
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.01/day
Besuchen on MRR →
MRR
Besuchen on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation für Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Modelliere Amortisation, Stromkosten und Erstjahresrendite für dieses Gerät.
Hardware-Kosten amortisiert, wenn die Linie 0 kreuzt. Danach reiner Gewinn.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Jährliche Emissionen pro Energiequelle
Basierend auf dem jährlichen Stromverbrauch und der CO₂-Intensität verschiedener Stromnetze.
| Energiequelle | CO₂e / Jahr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 33.26 kg |
| Nuclear | 36.29 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 72.58 kg |
| Geothermal | 114.91 kg |
| Solar | 136.08 kg |
| Biofuels | 695.52 kg |
| Gas | 1,481.76 kg |
| Coal | 2,479.68 kg |
Nur Schätzungen — tatsächliche Emissionen variieren.
Was bedeutet das konkret?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,436 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Wo du einsteckst, zählt
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,480 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 73 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
So reduzierst du den Fußabdruck dieses Rigs
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Tippen zum Wechseln · 8 Abschnitte Hashrate-Markt 4/8
Tägliche Prognose
Tägliche Sieger-Streams — gemittelt aus dem aufgezeichneten Verlauf des Rigs bei $0.1/kWh
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $4.67 | $140.11 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.84 | $25.20 |
| Gewinn | $3.83 | $114.91 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
Mining-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $1.98 | $59.40 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.84 | $25.20 |
| Gewinn | $1.14 | $34.20 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Algorithmus | Netto / Tag |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ Bester
122 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$1.14 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
157 Hh/s · 330.0 W
|
$0.06 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
134 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.09 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.3 Hh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
55 Mh/s · 377.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
285 Mh/s · 450.0 W
|
$-0.70 |
|
ETC
Etchash
128 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.76 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
16 Hh/s · 380.0 W
|
$-0.81 |
|
EQU
Equihash
149.5 Hh/s · 285.0 W
|
$-0.83 |
|
IRO
IronFish
22 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.83 |
|
SHA
Sha256
1.2 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
FIS
FishHash
81 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
BLA
Blake3
2.4 Gh/s · 150.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
ETH
Ethash
125 Mh/s · 450.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
52 Kh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
8 Gh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
1.65 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
470 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
53 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
125 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
MER
Meraki
128 Mh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
7.9 Kh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
QHA
Qhash
210 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
TON
Ton
5.5 Gh/s · 420.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
10.9 Hh/s · 290.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
157.0 hh/s · 330.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
EQU
EquihashZEL
89 Hh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
6.6 Hh/s · 350.0 W
|
$-0.84 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
122Mh · 350.0W
|
$1.98 | $0.84 | $1.14 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
157Hh · 330.0W
|
$0.90 | $0.79 | $0.11 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
134Mh · 230.0W
|
$0.75 | $0.55 | $0.20 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.3Hh · 380.0W
|
$0.47 | $0.91 | $-0.44 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
55Mh · 377.0W
|
$0.24 | $0.90 | $-0.66 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
285Mh · 450.0W
|
$0.14 | $1.08 | $-0.94 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
128Mh · 350.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.84 | $-0.76 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
16Hh · 380.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.91 | $-0.88 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
149.5Hh · 285.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.68 | $-0.67 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
22Gh · 140.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.34 | $-0.33 |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.2Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
24Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
2.4Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
50.0Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
1.9Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
105Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
125Mh · 450.0W
|
— | $1.08 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
52Kh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
8Gh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
600Kh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.65Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
470Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
53Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
125Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
128Mh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
7.9Kh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
210Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
5.5Gh · 420.0W
|
— | $1.01 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
10.9Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
53Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
157.0hh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
81.0Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
6.3Hh · 310.0W
|
— | $0.74 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
89Hh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
49Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
6.6Hh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
1.9Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
510.0Hh · 290.0W
|
— | $0.70 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
53Mh · 360.0W
|
— | $0.86 | — |
| Pool | Unterstützte Algos | Gebühr | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Verlauf der Netto-Mieteinnahmen
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $6.03 | $180.90 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.84 | $25.20 |
| Gewinn | $5.19 | $155.70 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Anbieter | GPU | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RunPod
GPU-Marktplatz
|
RTX 3090 Ti
$0.270/h ·
1 Angebot
|
$6.03
|
$0.84 |
$5.19
★
Besuchen →
|
Clore Ai
GPU-Marktplatz
|
RTX 3090 Ti
$0.162/h ·
4 Angebote
|
$3.31
1,520 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00218
|
$0.84 |
$2.47
Besuchen →
|
Einnahmenfluss So verdient Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti auf dem KI-GPU-Marktplatz how we got $5.19/day · ▾
Hashmarket-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.75 | $22.58 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.84 | $25.20 |
| Gewinn | $-0.09 | $-2.62 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Markt | Bestes Netto / Tag | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$-0.43 | Besuchen → |
MRR
|
$0.01 | Besuchen → |
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.01/day
Besuchen on MRR →
MRR
Besuchen on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation für Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Modelliere Amortisation, Stromkosten und Erstjahresrendite für dieses Gerät.
Hardware-Kosten amortisiert, wenn die Linie 0 kreuzt. Danach reiner Gewinn.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Jährliche Emissionen pro Energiequelle
Basierend auf dem jährlichen Stromverbrauch und der CO₂-Intensität verschiedener Stromnetze.
| Energiequelle | CO₂e / Jahr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 33.26 kg |
| Nuclear | 36.29 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 72.58 kg |
| Geothermal | 114.91 kg |
| Solar | 136.08 kg |
| Biofuels | 695.52 kg |
| Gas | 1,481.76 kg |
| Coal | 2,479.68 kg |
Nur Schätzungen — tatsächliche Emissionen variieren.
Was bedeutet das konkret?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,436 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Wo du einsteckst, zählt
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 2,480 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 73 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
So reduzierst du den Fußabdruck dieses Rigs
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.