Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super — Minage
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super rapporte jusqu'à $5.65 par jour, meilleur en location IA à $0.26/h avec 1 offre. Également disponible : minage Octopus à 95 Mh/s ($0.82/jour) and vente de hashpower KAWPOW ($0.19/jour). Consomme 250 W au mur — à $0.10/kWh, rentable aux tarifs actuels.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $4.24 | $127.10 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $3.64 | $109.10 |
Historique des paiements de minage
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ Meilleur
95 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$0.82 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
42 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
220 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.47 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
170 Mh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.50 |
|
ETC
Etchash
87 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
EQU
Equihash
189 Hh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.59 |
|
IRO
IronFish
34 Gh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.59 |
|
FIS
FishHash
62 Mh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
2.6 Gh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
ETH
Ethash
95 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
QHA
Qhash
332 Mh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
BLA
Blake3
3.75 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
28.5 Kh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
89 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
710 Mh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
11.5 Hh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.4 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
8.5 Kh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
49.4 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
MER
Meraki
87 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
TON
Ton
9.2 Gh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
12 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
125 Hh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
95Mh · 250.0W
|
$1.42 | $0.60 | $0.82 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42Mh · 320.0W
|
$0.23 | $0.77 | $-0.54 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
220Mh · 320.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.77 | $-0.64 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
170Mh · 280.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.67 | $-0.57 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
87Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.48 | $-0.41 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
189Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
34Gh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.6Gh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
95Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
332Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.75Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
28.5Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
89Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.65Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
970Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
710Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
950Kh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
48.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.6Kh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
11.5Hh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
8.5Kh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
49.4Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
87Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
9.2Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
12Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
8.7Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
125Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
49.4Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
47Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
Flux de revenus Comment Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA how we got $5.65/day · ▾
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super gagne $5.65/jour en louant pour des charges IA — nettement plus que les $0.82/jour en minant Octopus. Minage et location sont mutuellement exclusifs ; le marché IA est le choix évident ici.
Historique des revenus nets de location
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $6.25 | $187.50 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $5.65 | $169.50 |
Historique des revenus nets du marché du hashrate
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.41 | $12.32 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $-0.19 | $-5.68 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 23.76 kg |
| Nuclear | 25.92 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 51.84 kg |
| Geothermal | 82.08 kg |
| Solar | 97.2 kg |
| Biofuels | 496.8 kg |
| Gas | 1,058.4 kg |
| Coal | 1,771.2 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,026 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,771 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 52 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Projection quotidienne
Gagnants quotidiens parmi tous les flux de revenus — moyenne de l'historique enregistré du rig à $0.1/kWh
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $4.24 | $127.10 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $3.64 | $109.10 |
Historique des paiements de minage
| Algorithme | Net / jour |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ Meilleur
95 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$0.82 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
42 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
220 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.47 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
170 Mh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.50 |
|
ETC
Etchash
87 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
EQU
Equihash
189 Hh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.59 |
|
IRO
IronFish
34 Gh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.59 |
|
FIS
FishHash
62 Mh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
2.6 Gh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
ETH
Ethash
95 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
QHA
Qhash
332 Mh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
BLA
Blake3
3.75 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
28.5 Kh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
89 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
710 Mh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
11.5 Hh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.4 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
8.5 Kh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
49.4 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
MER
Meraki
87 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
TON
Ton
9.2 Gh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
12 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
125 Hh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Revenu | Coût | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
95Mh · 250.0W
|
$1.42 | $0.60 | $0.82 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42Mh · 320.0W
|
$0.23 | $0.77 | $-0.54 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
220Mh · 320.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.77 | $-0.64 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
170Mh · 280.0W
|
$0.10 | $0.67 | $-0.57 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
87Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.48 | $-0.41 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
189Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
34Gh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.6Gh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
95Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
332Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3.75Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
28.5Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
89Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.65Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
970Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
710Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
950Kh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
48.0Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.6Kh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
11.5Hh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
8.5Kh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
49.4Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
87Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
9.2Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
12Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
8.7Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
125Hh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
49.4Mh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
47Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
Flux de revenus Comment Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super gagne sur le marché de GPU pour l'IA how we got $5.65/day · ▾
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super gagne $5.65/jour en louant pour des charges IA — nettement plus que les $0.82/jour en minant Octopus. Minage et location sont mutuellement exclusifs ; le marché IA est le choix évident ici.
Historique des revenus nets de location
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $6.25 | $187.50 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $5.65 | $169.50 |
Historique des revenus nets du marché du hashrate
| Période | /Jour | /Mois |
|---|---|---|
| Revenu | $0.41 | $12.32 |
|
Coût
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.60 | $18.00 |
| Profit | $-0.19 | $-5.68 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Retour sur investissement pour Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super
Modélisez l'amortissement, l'électricité et le rendement de la première année pour cet équipement.
Coût matériel récupéré quand la ligne croise zéro.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Émissions annuelles par source
Basé sur la consommation annuelle et l'intensité carbone.
| Source d'énergie | CO₂e / an |
|---|---|
| Wind | 23.76 kg |
| Nuclear | 25.92 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 51.84 kg |
| Geothermal | 82.08 kg |
| Solar | 97.2 kg |
| Biofuels | 496.8 kg |
| Gas | 1,058.4 kg |
| Coal | 1,771.2 kg |
Estimations seulement.
Qu'est-ce que cela veut dire ?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,026 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Où tu branches compte
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,771 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 52 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Comment réduire l'empreinte de ce miner
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Questions fréquentes
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.