LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super — 加密货币挖矿
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super 每天净赚 最高 $5.58,最佳为 AI 出租 $0.26/小时,共 1 个挂单。 也可用于:挖 PearlHash 算力 125 Th/s($1.91/天) and 出售 Octopus 算力($-0.26/天)。 功耗 280 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 8 个区块 加密货币挖矿 2/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $5.60 | $167.92 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $4.93 | $147.82 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
Our own 0% fee mining pool — your wallet address is your login, payouts on-chain.
此页面是否有帮助?
感谢您的反馈!
还有什么想告诉我们?表单已在下方打开。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.58 | $77.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $1.91 | $57.30 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
PearlHash
★ 最佳
125 Th/s · 280.0 W
|
$1.91 |
|
KER
22 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$1.20 |
|
48.0 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$0.02 |
|
EVR
49.4 Mh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.02 |
|
1.4 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.23 |
|
95 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.24 |
|
42 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
170 Mh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.50 |
|
220 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
DYN
8.5 Kh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.56 |
|
125 Hh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
87 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.63 |
|
189 Hh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.66 |
|
3.75 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
95 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
34 Gh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
62 Mh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
XEL
28.5 Kh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
PYR
12 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
950 Kh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
CUC
11.5 Hh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
KAR
2.6 Gh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
HOO
710 Mh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
MEO
49.4 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
ABE
89 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
MER
87 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
QHA
332 Mh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
TON
9.2 Gh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
CRY
7.6 Kh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRL
|
PearlHash
125Th · 280.0W
|
$2.58 | $0.67 | $1.91 |
KRX
|
KeryxHash
22Mh · 150.0W
|
$1.87 | $0.36 | $1.51 |
Firo
|
FiroPoW
48.0Mh · 250.0W
|
$0.69 | $0.60 | $0.09 |
EVR
|
EvrProgPow
49.4Mh · 280.0W
|
$0.65 | $0.67 | $-0.02 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 250.0W
|
$0.44 | $0.60 | $-0.16 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
95Mh · 250.0W
|
$0.43 | $0.60 | $-0.17 |
|
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42Mh · 320.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.77 | $-0.58 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
170Mh · 280.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.67 | $-0.50 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
220Mh · 320.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.77 | $-0.62 |
DNX
⚠
DNX
|
DynexSolve
8.5Kh · 180.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.43 | $-0.32 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
125Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.58 | $-0.51 |
|
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
87Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.48 | $-0.44 |
|
Zcash
|
Equihash
189Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.65Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
ALPH
|
Blake3
3.75Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
8.7Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
95Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
IronFish
34Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
62Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
28.5Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
12Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
950Kh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
11.5Hh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.6Gh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
710Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
49.4Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
89Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
87Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
47Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
332Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
9.2Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.6Kh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
970Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · FiroPoW (FIRO) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| KAWPOW (RVN) · Verthash (VTC) · Equihash (ZEC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $6.25 | $187.50 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $5.58 | $167.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $5.58/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.41 | $12.31 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $-0.26 | $-7.79 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 26.61 kg |
| Nuclear | 29.03 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 58.06 kg |
| Geothermal | 91.93 kg |
| Solar | 108.86 kg |
| Biofuels | 556.42 kg |
| Gas | 1,185.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,983.74 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,149 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,984 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 58 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 8 个区块 加密货币挖矿 2/8
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $5.60 | $167.92 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $4.93 | $147.82 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.58 | $77.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $1.91 | $57.30 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
PearlHash
★ 最佳
125 Th/s · 280.0 W
|
$1.91 |
|
KER
22 Mh/s · 150.0 W
|
$1.20 |
|
48.0 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$0.02 |
|
EVR
49.4 Mh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.02 |
|
1.4 Hh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.23 |
|
95 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.24 |
|
42 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
170 Mh/s · 280.0 W
|
$-0.50 |
|
220 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
DYN
8.5 Kh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.56 |
|
125 Hh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.60 |
|
87 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.63 |
|
189 Hh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.66 |
|
3.75 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
95 Mh/s · 320.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
34 Gh/s · 240.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
62 Mh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
XEL
28.5 Kh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
PYR
12 Gh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
950 Kh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
CUC
11.5 Hh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
KAR
2.6 Gh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
HOO
710 Mh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
MEO
49.4 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
ABE
89 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
MER
87 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
QHA
332 Mh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
TON
9.2 Gh/s · 260.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
|
CRY
7.6 Kh/s · 270.0 W
|
$-0.67 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRL
|
PearlHash
125Th · 280.0W
|
$2.58 | $0.67 | $1.91 |
KRX
|
KeryxHash
22Mh · 150.0W
|
$1.87 | $0.36 | $1.51 |
Firo
|
FiroPoW
48.0Mh · 250.0W
|
$0.69 | $0.60 | $0.09 |
EVR
|
EvrProgPow
49.4Mh · 280.0W
|
$0.65 | $0.67 | $-0.02 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 250.0W
|
$0.44 | $0.60 | $-0.16 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
95Mh · 250.0W
|
$0.43 | $0.60 | $-0.17 |
|
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42Mh · 320.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.77 | $-0.58 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
170Mh · 280.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.67 | $-0.50 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
220Mh · 320.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.77 | $-0.62 |
DNX
⚠
DNX
|
DynexSolve
8.5Kh · 180.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.43 | $-0.32 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
125Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.58 | $-0.51 |
|
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
87Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.48 | $-0.44 |
|
Zcash
|
Equihash
189Hh · 240.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.58 | $-0.57 |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.65Gh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
ALPH
|
Blake3
3.75Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
8.7Mh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
95Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
IronFish
34Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
62Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
28.5Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
12Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
950Kh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
11.5Hh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.6Gh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
710Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
49.4Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
89Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
87Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
47Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
332Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
9.2Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.6Kh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
970Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · FiroPoW (FIRO) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| Autolykos2 (ERG) · Verthash (VTC) | — | Visit → | |
| Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → | |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → | |
| PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → | |
| FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → | |
| KAWPOW (RVN) · Verthash (VTC) · Equihash (ZEC) | — | Visit → | |
| Blake3 (ALPH) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
净租赁收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $6.25 | $187.50 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $5.58 | $167.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
收入流 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径 how we got $5.58/day · ▾
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.41 | $12.31 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $-0.26 | $-7.79 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 26.61 kg |
| Nuclear | 29.03 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 58.06 kg |
| Geothermal | 91.93 kg |
| Solar | 108.86 kg |
| Biofuels | 556.42 kg |
| Gas | 1,185.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,983.74 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,149 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 Super's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,984 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 58 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.