LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 每天净赚 $1.12 挖 FishHash 算力 39 Mh/s 功耗 150.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情有利润。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.75 | $52.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.36 | $10.80 |
| 利润 | $1.39 | $41.60 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
39Mh · 150.0W
|
$1.48 | $0.36 | $1.12 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
79Mh · 220.0W
|
$1.02 | $0.53 | $0.49 |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
2.45Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
6.7Hh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.68Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.8Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.5Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.53 | $-0.38 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
89Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.53 | $-0.38 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
37.8Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.53 | $-0.40 |
|
—
|
Ethash
55.2Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
74Hh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
108Mh · 160.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.38 | $-0.33 |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
1.38Kh · 190.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.46 | $-0.42 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
55.2Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.43 | $-0.40 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.8Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.53 | $-0.51 |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
540Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.6Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
980Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
750Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
21.5Kh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
350Kh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
31.5Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
41Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
1Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
3.1Kh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
60Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
14.7Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavy
1.45Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
2.3Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Hex
30Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
375.0Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.1Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
45.5Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
7.9Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
4.6Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
98.5Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
6.9Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
31.5Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
cuckARooz29
6.8Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
23Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
18Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
10.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
58Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) · RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Turing
- Base Clock
- 1350 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 1545 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 4352
- GPU Power
- 250 W
- Max Memory Size
- 11 GB
- Memory Bandwidth
- 616 GB/s
- Memory Type
- GDDR6
- Mining algos
- 43
- Model
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Power
- 220 W
- Process
- 12 nm
- Release
- September 2018
- Release year
- 2018
- TDP
- 220 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002914 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.18 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.30
★
$0.66 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$3.49
★
$3.85 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000013984 BTC/M/d
|
$0.48
$0.84 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002175 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
$0.15 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006489 BTC/M/d
|
$0.08
★
$0.44 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$1.86
★
$2.22 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.43
$0.79 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000056303 BTC/M/d
|
$1.40
★
$1.76 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$1.55
★
$1.91 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000056294 BTC/M/d
|
$1.40
$1.76 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003171 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.09 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
—
★
$0.36 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.45 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000028038 BTC/M/d
|
$0.47
$0.83 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000062130 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.13 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
2% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.32
★
$0.68 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.31
★
$0.67 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.40
$0.76 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000711 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.32
$0.04 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.04
★
$0.40 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.10
★
$0.46 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.04
$0.40 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005650 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.14 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000009990 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.24 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013130 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.31 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012544 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
$0.30 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004232 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.24
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000517 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.02 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.05 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| RandomX | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
RandomX
0.00000040340 BTC/K/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
21% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
RandomX
0.00000039500 BTC/K/d
|
$-0.32
$0.04 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
RandomX
0.00000059952 BTC/K/d
|
$-0.30
$0.06 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
RandomX
0.00000052623 BTC/K/d
|
$-0.30
$0.06 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000584 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000260915 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000185 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000050560 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
19% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000076670 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000070480 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 14.26 kg |
| Nuclear | 15.55 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 31.1 kg |
| Geothermal | 49.25 kg |
| Solar | 58.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 298.08 kg |
| Gas | 635.04 kg |
| Coal | 1,062.72 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 616 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,063 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 31 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.75 | $52.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.36 | $10.80 |
| 利润 | $1.39 | $41.60 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
39Mh · 150.0W
|
$1.48 | $0.36 | $1.12 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
79Mh · 220.0W
|
$1.02 | $0.53 | $0.49 |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
2.45Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
6.7Hh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.68Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.8Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.5Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.53 | $-0.38 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
89Mh · 220.0W
|
$0.15 | $0.53 | $-0.38 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
37.8Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.53 | $-0.40 |
|
—
|
Ethash
55.2Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
74Hh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
108Mh · 160.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.38 | $-0.33 |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
1.38Kh · 190.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.46 | $-0.42 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
55.2Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.43 | $-0.40 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.8Hh · 220.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.53 | $-0.51 |
|
HNS
⚠
Handshake
|
Handshake
540Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.6Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
980Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
750Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
21.5Kh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
350Kh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
31.5Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
41Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightR
1Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
3.1Kh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
60Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
PHI2
14.7Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightHeavy
1.45Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightFast
2.3Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Hex
30Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d
375.0Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.1Kh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
45.5Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
7.9Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
MTP
4.6Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
98.5Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroom29
6.9Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
31.5Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
cuckARooz29
6.8Hh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
23Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
18Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
10.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
58Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) · RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
- Architecture
- Turing
- Base Clock
- 1350 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 1545 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 4352
- GPU Power
- 250 W
- Max Memory Size
- 11 GB
- Memory Bandwidth
- 616 GB/s
- Memory Type
- GDDR6
- Mining algos
- 43
- Model
- GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Power
- 220 W
- Process
- 12 nm
- Release
- September 2018
- Release year
- 2018
- TDP
- 220 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002914 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.18 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.30
★
$0.66 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$3.49
★
$3.85 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000013984 BTC/M/d
|
$0.48
$0.84 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002175 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.21
$0.15 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006489 BTC/M/d
|
$0.08
★
$0.44 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$1.86
★
$2.22 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.43
$0.79 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000056303 BTC/M/d
|
$1.40
★
$1.76 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$1.55
★
$1.91 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000056294 BTC/M/d
|
$1.40
$1.76 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003171 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.27
$0.09 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
—
★
$0.36 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.45 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000028038 BTC/M/d
|
$0.47
$0.83 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000062130 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.13 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
2% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.32
★
$0.68 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.31
★
$0.67 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.40
$0.76 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000711 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.32
$0.04 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.04
★
$0.40 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.10
★
$0.46 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.04
$0.40 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005650 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.14 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000009990 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.24 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013130 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
★
$0.31 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012544 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.06
$0.30 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004232 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.24
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.08 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000517 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.02 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
$0.05 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| RandomX | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
RandomX
0.00000040340 BTC/K/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
21% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
RandomX
0.00000039500 BTC/K/d
|
$-0.32
$0.04 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
RandomX
0.00000059952 BTC/K/d
|
$-0.30
$0.06 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
RandomX
0.00000052623 BTC/K/d
|
$-0.30
$0.06 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000584 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000260915 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000185 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000050560 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
19% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000076670 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000070480 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.36
$0.00 收入 · $0.36 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 14.26 kg |
| Nuclear | 15.55 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 31.1 kg |
| Geothermal | 49.25 kg |
| Solar | 58.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 298.08 kg |
| Gas | 635.04 kg |
| Coal | 1,062.72 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti running 24/7 for a year releases about 616 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,063 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 31 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.