LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 earns $1.25 per day renting on the AI GPU marketplace at a median rate of $0.07/h, drawing 150W. At $0.1/kWh electricity, the daily power cost is $0.41.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.65 | $49.61 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| 利润 | $1.25 | $37.37 |
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5070
$0.081/h ·
1 个报价
|
$1.65
|
$0.41 |
$1.24
★
访问 →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
85Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.96 | $0.41 | $0.55 |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
8.9Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
130Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.21 | $0.41 | $-0.20 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
41Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.18 | $0.43 | $-0.25 |
|
—
|
Ethash
80Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
200Mh · 110.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.26 | $-0.17 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
80Hh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
80Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.36 | $-0.32 |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
80.0Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
50Kh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
41Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Blackwell
- Mining algos
- 7
- Model
- GeForce RTX 5070
- Power
- 180 W
- Process
- 4 nm
- Release
- 2025
- Release year
- 2025
- TDP
- 180 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5070
$0.081/h ·
1 个报价
|
$1.65
|
$0.41 |
$1.24
★
访问 →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $1.24,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $0.55/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002913 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.19 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.30
★
$0.71 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$3.71
★
$4.12 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014130 BTC/M/d
|
$0.50
$0.91 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002174 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.21 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006365 BTC/M/d
|
$0.22
★
$0.63 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$2.82
★
$3.23 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.74
$1.15 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003167 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.19 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.32
★
$0.73 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$0.50
★
$0.91 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024894 BTC/M/d
|
$1.10
$1.51 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000700 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.37
$0.04 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.43 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.50 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
$0.43 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005619 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.17 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.08
★
$0.33 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013186 BTC/M/d
|
—
★
$0.41 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012423 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.02
$0.39 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
$0.03 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
3% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
★
$0.10 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001213 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.07 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000586 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.09 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.41
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.16 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.63 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.25 kg |
| Geothermal | 55.81 kg |
| Solar | 66.1 kg |
| Biofuels | 337.82 kg |
| Gas | 719.71 kg |
| Coal | 1,204.42 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 698 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,204 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 35 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.65 | $49.61 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.41 | $12.30 |
| 利润 | $1.25 | $37.37 |
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5070
$0.081/h ·
1 个报价
|
$1.65
|
$0.41 |
$1.24
★
访问 →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
85Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.96 | $0.41 | $0.55 |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
8.9Hh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
130Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.21 | $0.41 | $-0.20 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
41Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.18 | $0.43 | $-0.25 |
|
—
|
Ethash
80Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
200Mh · 110.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.26 | $-0.17 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
80Hh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
80Mh · 150.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.36 | $-0.32 |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
80.0Mh · 150.0W
|
— | $0.36 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
50Kh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
41Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
- Architecture
- Blackwell
- Mining algos
- 7
- Model
- GeForce RTX 5070
- Power
- 180 W
- Process
- 4 nm
- Release
- 2025
- Release year
- 2025
- TDP
- 180 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 5070
$0.081/h ·
1 个报价
|
$1.65
|
$0.41 |
$1.24
★
访问 →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $1.24,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $0.55/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002913 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.19 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.30
★
$0.71 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$3.71
★
$4.12 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014130 BTC/M/d
|
$0.50
$0.91 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002174 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
$0.21 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006365 BTC/M/d
|
$0.22
★
$0.63 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$2.82
★
$3.23 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.74
$1.15 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003167 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.22
$0.19 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.32
★
$0.73 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$0.50
★
$0.91 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024894 BTC/M/d
|
$1.10
$1.51 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000700 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.37
$0.04 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.43 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.50 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
$0.43 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005619 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.24
$0.17 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.08
★
$0.33 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013186 BTC/M/d
|
—
★
$0.41 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012423 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.02
$0.39 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000500 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.38
$0.03 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
3% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001610 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.31
★
$0.10 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001213 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.07 收入 · $0.41 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000586 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.32
★
$0.09 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000182 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.41
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.41 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.16 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.63 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.25 kg |
| Geothermal | 55.81 kg |
| Solar | 66.1 kg |
| Biofuels | 337.82 kg |
| Gas | 719.71 kg |
| Coal | 1,204.42 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 698 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,204 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 35 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.