LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super — 挖矿盈利模拟器
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 每天净赚 最高 $2.85,最佳为挖 FishHash 算力 55 Mh/s。 也可用于:出售 KAWPOW 算力($-0.03/天)。 功耗 190 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 7 个区块 挖矿盈利模拟器 4/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.27 | $38.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.53 | $15.90 |
| 利润 | $0.74 | $22.20 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
此页面是否有帮助?
感谢您的反馈!
还有什么想告诉我们?表单已在下方打开。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.27 | $38.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.53 | $15.90 |
| 利润 | $0.74 | $22.20 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ 最佳
83 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$0.74 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
150 Mh/s · 260.0 W
|
$0.35 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
94 Hh/s · 210.0 W
|
$0.01 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.1 Hh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.14 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
57 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
42.3 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
161 Mh/s · 110.0 W
|
$-0.45 |
|
ETC
Etchash
83 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
8.3 Hh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.51 |
|
IRO
IronFish
28 Gh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
EQU
Equihash
103.2 Hh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
SHA
Sha256
1.7 Gh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
FIS
FishHash
55 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
2.2 Gh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
580 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
42.3 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
82 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
MER
Meraki
83 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
8.1 Kh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
QHA
Qhash
275 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
TON
Ton
7.6 Gh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
9.6 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
BLA
Blake3
3 Gh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
ETH
Ethash
83 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
28 Kh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
10 Gh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
83Mh · 220.0W
|
$1.27 | $0.53 | $0.74 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
150Mh · 260.0W
|
$0.88 | $0.62 | $0.26 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
94Hh · 210.0W
|
$0.54 | $0.50 | $0.04 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.1Hh · 210.0W
|
$0.39 | $0.50 | $-0.11 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
57Hh · 200.0W
|
$0.25 | $0.48 | $-0.23 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42.3Mh · 250.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.60 | $-0.41 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
161Mh · 110.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.26 | $-0.18 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
83Mh · 190.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.46 | $-0.41 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
8.3Hh · 160.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.38 | $-0.36 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
28Gh · 220.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.53 | $-0.52 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.31 | $-0.30 |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.7Gh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
800Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.2Gh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
580Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
42.3Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
82Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
83Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
8.1Kh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
275Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
7.6Gh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
32.0Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.2Kh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
42Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
9.6Hh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
42.3Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.45Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3Gh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
6.8Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
83Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
28Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
10Gh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
790Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
★
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.43 | $12.91 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.46 | $13.80 |
| 利润 | $-0.03 | $-0.89 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.20/day
访问 on MRR →
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 20.91 kg |
| Nuclear | 22.81 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 45.62 kg |
| Geothermal | 72.23 kg |
| Solar | 85.54 kg |
| Biofuels | 437.18 kg |
| Gas | 931.39 kg |
| Coal | 1,558.66 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super running 24/7 for a year releases about 903 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,559 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 46 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 7 个区块 挖矿盈利模拟器 4/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.27 | $38.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.53 | $15.90 |
| 利润 | $0.74 | $22.20 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $1.27 | $38.10 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.53 | $15.90 |
| 利润 | $0.74 | $22.20 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ 最佳
83 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$0.74 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
150 Mh/s · 260.0 W
|
$0.35 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
94 Hh/s · 210.0 W
|
$0.01 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
1.1 Hh/s · 210.0 W
|
$-0.14 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
57 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
42.3 Mh/s · 250.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
161 Mh/s · 110.0 W
|
$-0.45 |
|
ETC
Etchash
83 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.48 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
8.3 Hh/s · 160.0 W
|
$-0.51 |
|
IRO
IronFish
28 Gh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
EQU
Equihash
103.2 Hh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
SHA
Sha256
1.7 Gh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
FIS
FishHash
55 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
2.2 Gh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
580 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
MEO
MeowPow
42.3 Mh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
82 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
MER
Meraki
83 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
8.1 Kh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
QHA
Qhash
275 Mh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
TON
Ton
7.6 Gh/s · 220.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
CUC
Cuckaroo29
9.6 Hh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
BLA
Blake3
3 Gh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
ETH
Ethash
83 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
28 Kh/s · 120.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
10 Gh/s · 230.0 W
|
$-0.53 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
83Mh · 220.0W
|
$1.27 | $0.53 | $0.74 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
150Mh · 260.0W
|
$0.88 | $0.62 | $0.26 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
94Hh · 210.0W
|
$0.54 | $0.50 | $0.04 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.1Hh · 210.0W
|
$0.39 | $0.50 | $-0.11 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
57Hh · 200.0W
|
$0.25 | $0.48 | $-0.23 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
42.3Mh · 250.0W
|
$0.19 | $0.60 | $-0.41 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
161Mh · 110.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.26 | $-0.18 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
83Mh · 190.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.46 | $-0.41 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
8.3Hh · 160.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.38 | $-0.36 |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
28Gh · 220.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.53 | $-0.52 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
103.2Hh · 130.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.31 | $-0.30 |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.7Gh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
800Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.2Gh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
580Mh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
42.3Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
82Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
83Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
8.1Kh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
275Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
7.6Gh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
32.0Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
7.2Kh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
42Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
9.6Hh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
42.3Mh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
1.45Gh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
3Gh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
VTC
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
6.8Gh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
83Mh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
28Kh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
10Gh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
790Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
★
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.43 | $12.91 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.46 | $13.80 |
| 利润 | $-0.03 | $-0.89 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.20/day
访问 on MRR →
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 20.91 kg |
| Nuclear | 22.81 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 45.62 kg |
| Geothermal | 72.23 kg |
| Solar | 85.54 kg |
| Biofuels | 437.18 kg |
| Gas | 931.39 kg |
| Coal | 1,558.66 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super running 24/7 for a year releases about 903 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,559 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 46 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.