LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 earns $2.09 per day renting on the AI GPU marketplace at a median rate of $0.12/h, drawing 320W. At $0.1/kWh electricity, the daily power cost is $0.67.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.76 | $82.94 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $2.09 | $62.78 |
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.136/h ·
3 个报价
|
$2.76
|
$0.67 |
$2.09
★
访问 →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
120Mh · 280.0W
|
$1.50 | $0.67 | $0.83 |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
15.5Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
120Mh · 330.0W
|
$0.51 | $0.79 | $-0.28 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
180Mh · 380.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.91 | $-0.61 |
|
—
|
Ethash
200Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
45Hh · 350.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.84 | $-0.67 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
380Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.48 | $-0.31 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
200Mh · 260.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.62 | $-0.51 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.5Hh · 300.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.72 | $-0.70 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
185Hh · 310.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.74 | $-0.73 |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
28Gh · 320.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.77 | $-0.76 |
|
—
|
Blake3
2.8Gh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.8Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
1.4Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
68Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
64Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
100Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
26Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
2.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
68Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
720Hh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
10.5Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.2Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
9.8Gh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
560Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
67Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
6.2Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
100Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
110Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.5Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
140Mh · 380.0W
|
— | $0.91 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
45Kh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
9.8Kh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
620Kh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 2230 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2520 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 16384
- GPU Power
- 450 W
- Max Memory Size
- 24 GB
- Memory Bandwidth
- 1008 GB/s
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 28
- Model
- GeForce RTX 4090
- Power
- 380 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- October 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 380 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.136/h ·
3 个报价
|
$2.76
|
$0.67 |
$2.09
★
访问 →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $2.09,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $0.83/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002982 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.27 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.34
★
$1.01 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$5.20
★
$5.87 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000015516 BTC/M/d
|
$0.75
$1.42 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002181 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.30 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006702 BTC/M/d
|
$0.25
★
$0.92 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$3.84
★
$4.51 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.93
$1.60 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003169 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.21 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
★
$0.78 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$0.31
★
$0.98 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000025875 BTC/M/d
|
$1.01
$1.68 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005575 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.16
$0.51 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000009990 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.91 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013130 BTC/M/d
|
$0.53
★
$1.20 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012459 BTC/M/d
|
$0.47
$1.14 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000725 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.59
$0.08 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000009735 BTC/H/d
|
$0.44
★
$1.11 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.94 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.14
$0.81 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.31 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000550 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.59
$0.08 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.19 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001507 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.44
★
$0.23 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001204 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.49
$0.18 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000585 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.50
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004272 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.52
★
$0.15 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000048 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.66
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
11% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.66
$0.01 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000068 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.66
$0.01 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000260507 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000366000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000189 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000050771 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
17% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068900 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000077640 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000069790 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 26.61 kg |
| Nuclear | 29.03 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 58.06 kg |
| Geothermal | 91.93 kg |
| Solar | 108.86 kg |
| Biofuels | 556.42 kg |
| Gas | 1,185.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,983.74 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,149 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,984 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 58 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测 RENTAL
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $2.76 | $82.94 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.67 | $20.10 |
| 利润 | $2.09 | $62.78 |
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.136/h ·
3 个报价
|
$2.76
|
$0.67 |
$2.09
★
访问 →
|
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
120Mh · 280.0W
|
$1.50 | $0.67 | $0.83 |
|
—
|
Cuckaroo29
15.5Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
120Mh · 330.0W
|
$0.51 | $0.79 | $-0.28 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
180Mh · 380.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.91 | $-0.61 |
|
—
|
Ethash
200Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
45Hh · 350.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.84 | $-0.67 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
380Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.48 | $-0.31 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
200Mh · 260.0W
|
$0.11 | $0.62 | $-0.51 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.5Hh · 300.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.72 | $-0.70 |
|
ZEC
Zcash
|
Equihash
185Hh · 310.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.74 | $-0.73 |
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
28Gh · 320.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.77 | $-0.76 |
|
—
|
Blake3
2.8Gh · 350.0W
|
— | $0.84 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
1.8Gh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
1.4Gh · 240.0W
|
— | $0.58 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
68Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
EPIC
⚠
Epic Cash
|
ProgPow
64Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
100Mh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
1.4Hh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
150Hh · 250.0W
|
— | $0.60 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
26Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
2.1Mh · 220.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
68Mh · 330.0W
|
— | $0.79 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
720Hh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
10.5Kh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
2.2Gh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
9.8Gh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
560Mh · 230.0W
|
— | $0.55 | — |
|
—
|
MeowPow
67Mh · 300.0W
|
— | $0.72 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
6.2Gh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
100Mh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
110Mh · 270.0W
|
— | $0.65 | — |
|
—
|
SHA3x
1.5Gh · 260.0W
|
— | $0.62 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
140Mh · 380.0W
|
— | $0.91 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
45Kh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
9.8Kh · 320.0W
|
— | $0.77 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
620Kh · 280.0W
|
— | $0.67 | — |
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Base Clock
- 2230 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2520 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 16384
- GPU Power
- 450 W
- Max Memory Size
- 24 GB
- Memory Bandwidth
- 1008 GB/s
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Mining algos
- 28
- Model
- GeForce RTX 4090
- Power
- 380 W
- Process
- 5 nm
- Release
- October 2022
- Release year
- 2022
- TDP
- 380 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 在 AI GPU 出租市场上的收益路径
| 平台 | GPU | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vast.ai
GPU 市场
|
RTX 4090
$0.136/h ·
3 个报价
|
$2.76
|
$0.67 |
$2.09
★
访问 →
|
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 出租给 AI 任务每日可赚 $2.09,明显超过挖 Octopus 的 $0.83/日。挖矿和出租互斥,此处 AI 市场是更优选择。
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000002982 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.40
$0.27 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.34
★
$1.01 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$5.20
★
$5.87 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000015516 BTC/M/d
|
$0.75
$1.42 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002181 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
$0.30 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006702 BTC/M/d
|
$0.25
★
$0.92 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$3.84
★
$4.51 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.93
$1.60 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003169 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.46
$0.21 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
★
$0.78 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$0.31
★
$0.98 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000025875 BTC/M/d
|
$1.01
$1.68 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005575 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.16
$0.51 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
4% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000009990 BTC/M/d
|
$0.24
★
$0.91 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000013130 BTC/M/d
|
$0.53
★
$1.20 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012459 BTC/M/d
|
$0.47
$1.14 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000725 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.59
$0.08 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000009735 BTC/H/d
|
$0.44
★
$1.11 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.27
★
$0.94 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.14
$0.81 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.31 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000550 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.59
$0.08 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.48
★
$0.19 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001507 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.44
★
$0.23 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001204 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.49
$0.18 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000585 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.50
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004272 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.52
★
$0.15 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Equihash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Equihash
0.00000000048 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.66
★
$0.01 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
11% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Equihash
0.00000000027 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Equihash
0.00000000069 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.66
$0.01 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Equihash
0.00000000068 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.66
$0.01 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000260507 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000366000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000189 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000050771 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
17% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068900 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000077640 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000069790 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.67
$0.00 收入 · $0.67 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 26.61 kg |
| Nuclear | 29.03 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 58.06 kg |
| Geothermal | 91.93 kg |
| Solar | 108.86 kg |
| Biofuels | 556.42 kg |
| Gas | 1,185.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,983.74 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 running 24/7 for a year releases about 1,149 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,984 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 58 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.