LP Agent
Intel ARC A770 — 挖矿盈利模拟器
Intel ARC A770 每天净亏 最高 $0.18,最佳为挖 Zhash 算力 41 Hh/s。 也可用于:出售 Autolykos2 算力($-0.34/天)。 功耗 175 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情暂未回本。
点击切换 · 7 个区块 挖矿盈利模拟器 4/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.24 | $7.09 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $-0.18 | $-5.51 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.24 | $7.20 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $-0.18 | $-5.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
ZHA
Zhash
★ 最佳
41 Hh/s · 175.0 W
|
$-0.18 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
27 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
148 Mh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
328 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.42 |
|
EQU
EquihashZEL
38 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.42 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
41Hh · 175.0W
|
$0.24 | $0.42 | $-0.18 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
27Hh · 200.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.48 | $-0.36 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
148Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.41 | $-0.33 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
328Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
38Hh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
6
666pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
A
aikapool.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
A
antpool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
A
app.katpool.xyz
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
B
baikalmine.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
beam.2miners.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.acepool.top
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.cedric-crispin.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.herominers.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.leafpool.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.sunpool.top
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
btcz.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cloverpool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cruxpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
emcd.io
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.herominers.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.nanopool.org
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
F
f2pool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
fenixpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
G
gogpool.eu
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashbay.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashmonkeys.cloud
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
J
jjpool.fr
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
k1pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
kas.2miners.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kas.humpool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kas.solopool.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kaspa-pool.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kaspa.acc-pool.pw
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kaspa.cedric-crispin.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kaspa.herominers.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
kekpool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
korvexpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
L
l6pool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
M
minepoolis.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
mining4people.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
M
moneroocean.stream
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nushypool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.binance.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
P
poolin.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pooly.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rockpool.cloud
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
S
sigmanauts.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
solo-beam.2miners.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
solo-erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
solo-kas.2miners.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.kaspa.acc-pool.pw
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
S
swgroupe.fr
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tazmining.ch
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
trustpool.cc
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tw-pool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
V
viabtc.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
W
whalepool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
W
woolypooly.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
X
xpoolx.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
X
xsg.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zpool.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.08 | $2.29 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $-0.34 | $-10.31 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Intel ARC A770 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.63 kg |
| Nuclear | 18.14 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 36.29 kg |
| Geothermal | 57.46 kg |
| Solar | 68.04 kg |
| Biofuels | 347.76 kg |
| Gas | 740.88 kg |
| Coal | 1,239.84 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Intel ARC A770 running 24/7 for a year releases about 718 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Intel ARC A770's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,240 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 36 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 7 个区块 挖矿盈利模拟器 4/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.24 | $7.09 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $-0.18 | $-5.51 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.24 | $7.20 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $-0.18 | $-5.40 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
ZHA
Zhash
★ 最佳
41 Hh/s · 175.0 W
|
$-0.18 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
27 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
148 Mh/s · 170.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
328 Mh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.42 |
|
EQU
EquihashZEL
38 Hh/s · 200.0 W
|
$-0.42 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
41Hh · 175.0W
|
$0.24 | $0.42 | $-0.18 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
27Hh · 200.0W
|
$0.12 | $0.48 | $-0.36 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
148Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.41 | $-0.33 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
328Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
EquihashZEL
38Hh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
6
666pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
A
aikapool.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
A
antpool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
A
app.katpool.xyz
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
B
baikalmine.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
beam.2miners.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.acepool.top
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.cedric-crispin.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.herominers.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.leafpool.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
beam.sunpool.top
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
|
B
btcz.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cloverpool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cruxpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
C
cyberpool.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
emcd.io
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.herominers.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
E
ergo.nanopool.org
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
F
f2pool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
fenixpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
G
gogpool.eu
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashbay.io
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
H
hashmonkeys.cloud
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
J
jjpool.fr
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
k1pool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
kas.2miners.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kas.humpool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kas.solopool.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kaspa-pool.org
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kaspa.acc-pool.pw
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kaspa.cedric-crispin.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
kaspa.herominers.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
kekpool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
K
korvexpool.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
L
l6pool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
M
minepoolis.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
mining4people.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
M
moneroocean.stream
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
|
N
nushypool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.binance.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pool.kryptex.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
P
poolin.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
P
pooly.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) | — | Visit → |
|
R
rockpool.cloud
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
S
sigmanauts.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
solo-beam.2miners.com
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) | — | Visit → |
solo-erg.2miners.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
solo-kas.2miners.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.kaspa.acc-pool.pw
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
S
solo.zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
S
swgroupe.fr
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tazmining.ch
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
trustpool.cc
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
T
tw-pool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
V
viabtc.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
W
whalepool.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
W
woolypooly.com
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
X
xpoolx.com
|
KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
|
X
xsg.darkfibermines.com
|
Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zeropool.io
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
|
Z
zpool.ca
|
Zhash (BTCZ) · Zhash (LTZ) | — | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.08 | $2.29 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $-0.34 | $-10.31 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Intel ARC A770 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.63 kg |
| Nuclear | 18.14 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 36.29 kg |
| Geothermal | 57.46 kg |
| Solar | 68.04 kg |
| Biofuels | 347.76 kg |
| Gas | 740.88 kg |
| Coal | 1,239.84 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Intel ARC A770 running 24/7 for a year releases about 718 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Intel ARC A770's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,240 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 36 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.