LP Agent
Nvidia CMP 50HX
Nvidia CMP 50HX 每天净赚 最高 $0.24,最佳为挖 Zhash 算力 101 Hh/s。 也可用于:出售 KAWPOW 算力($-0.22/天)。 功耗 224 W — 按 $0.10/kWh 计算,按当前行情有利润。
点击切换 · 7 个区块 概览 1/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.78 | $23.46 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| 利润 | $0.24 | $7.26 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
此页面是否有帮助?
感谢您的反馈!
还有什么想告诉我们?表单已在下方打开。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.78 | $23.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| 利润 | $0.24 | $7.20 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
ZHA
Zhash
★ 最佳
101 Hh/s · 224.0 W
|
$0.24 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
1.73779 Mh/s · 229.0 W
|
$-0.09 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
41.122547 Mh/s · 221.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
OCT
Octopus
11.232398 Mh/s · 131.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
35 Hh/s · 217.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
31.12 Mh/s · 224.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
94.053781 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.49 |
|
ETC
Etchash
54.12 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.51 |
|
RAN
RandomX
1.093 Kh/s · 197.0 W
|
$-0.51 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
10 Hh/s · 218.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
71.531283 Mh/s · 215.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
747.518016 Mh/s · 223.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
3.20863 Mh/s · 128.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
NIS
NIST5
43.6858 Mh/s · 218.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
X16
X16R
17.20334 Mh/s · 199.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
9.70908 Mh/s · 179.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
1 Hh/s · 226.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
1.9 Hh/s · 192.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
VER
VerusHash
8.51459 Mh/s · 188.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
ETH
Ethash
54.12 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
30.497 Hh/s · 217.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
376 Hh/s · 222.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
5.328 Kh/s · 143.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
8.692930736 Gh/s · 224.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
KEC
Keccak
1.48373136 Gh/s · 224.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
101Hh · 224.0W
|
$0.78 | $0.54 | $0.24 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
1.73779Mh · 229.0W
|
$0.45 | $0.55 | $-0.10 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
41.122547Mh · 221.0W
|
$0.24 | $0.53 | $-0.29 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
11.232398Mh · 131.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.31 | $-0.14 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
35Hh · 217.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.52 | $-0.36 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.12Mh · 224.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.54 | $-0.41 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
94.053781Mh · 190.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.46 | $-0.41 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
54.12Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.43 | $-0.40 |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
1.093Kh · 197.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.47 | $-0.44 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10Hh · 218.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.52 | $-0.50 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
71.531283Mh · 215.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
747.518016Mh · 223.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
3.20863Mh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
43.6858Mh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
18.373182Mh · 164.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.149Mh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
28.941479Mh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
497.2532Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
57.10385Mh · 223.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
52.626567Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
47.66303Mh · 208.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
17.20334Mh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
10.309456Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
9.70908Mh · 179.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
10.3291Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X17
10.257302Mh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
3.188779Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1Hh · 226.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
7.505757Mh · 165.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.9Hh · 192.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
117.777183Mh · 131.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
9.59665Mh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
31.000657Mh · 227.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.041749319Gh · 226.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
2.82440006Gh · 221.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
8.51459Mh · 188.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
915Hh · 131.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
58.7911Mh · 204.0W
|
— | $0.49 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
54.12Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
30.497Hh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
376Hh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
5.328Kh · 143.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
8.692930736Gh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
57.748Kh · 223.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
10.508252Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
C11
14.9781Mh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
65Hh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
77Hh · 226.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
30Hh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
376Hh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
6.432981Mh · 171.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.48373136Gh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.4651Gh · 223.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
kriptokyng.com
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) · RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
SupportXMR
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.32 | $9.70 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| 利润 | $-0.22 | $-6.50 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.13/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia CMP 50HX 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 21.29 kg |
| Nuclear | 23.22 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 46.45 kg |
| Geothermal | 73.54 kg |
| Solar | 87.09 kg |
| Biofuels | 445.13 kg |
| Gas | 948.33 kg |
| Coal | 1,587.0 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia CMP 50HX running 24/7 for a year releases about 919 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia CMP 50HX's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,587 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 46 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
点击切换 · 7 个区块 概览 1/7
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.78 | $23.46 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| 利润 | $0.24 | $7.26 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
挖矿收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.78 | $23.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| 利润 | $0.24 | $7.20 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
| 算法 | 净收益 / 天 |
|---|---|
|
ZHA
Zhash
★ 最佳
101 Hh/s · 224.0 W
|
$0.24 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
1.73779 Mh/s · 229.0 W
|
$-0.09 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
41.122547 Mh/s · 221.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
OCT
Octopus
11.232398 Mh/s · 131.0 W
|
$-0.37 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
35 Hh/s · 217.0 W
|
$-0.38 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
31.12 Mh/s · 224.0 W
|
$-0.41 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
94.053781 Mh/s · 190.0 W
|
$-0.49 |
|
ETC
Etchash
54.12 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.51 |
|
RAN
RandomX
1.093 Kh/s · 197.0 W
|
$-0.51 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
10 Hh/s · 218.0 W
|
$-0.52 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
71.531283 Mh/s · 215.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
747.518016 Mh/s · 223.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
3.20863 Mh/s · 128.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
NIS
NIST5
43.6858 Mh/s · 218.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
X16
X16R
17.20334 Mh/s · 199.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
9.70908 Mh/s · 179.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo31
1 Hh/s · 226.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
1.9 Hh/s · 192.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
VER
VerusHash
8.51459 Mh/s · 188.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
ETH
Ethash
54.12 Mh/s · 180.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
EQU
Equihash192_7
30.497 Hh/s · 217.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
376 Hh/s · 222.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
5.328 Kh/s · 143.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
8.692930736 Gh/s · 224.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
|
KEC
Keccak
1.48373136 Gh/s · 224.0 W
|
$-0.54 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
101Hh · 224.0W
|
$0.78 | $0.54 | $0.24 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
1.73779Mh · 229.0W
|
$0.45 | $0.55 | $-0.10 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
41.122547Mh · 221.0W
|
$0.24 | $0.53 | $-0.29 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
11.232398Mh · 131.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.31 | $-0.14 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
35Hh · 217.0W
|
$0.16 | $0.52 | $-0.36 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
31.12Mh · 224.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.54 | $-0.41 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
94.053781Mh · 190.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.46 | $-0.41 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
54.12Mh · 180.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.43 | $-0.40 |
|
XMR
Monero
|
RandomX
1.093Kh · 197.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.47 | $-0.44 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10Hh · 218.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.52 | $-0.50 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
71.531283Mh · 215.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
747.518016Mh · 223.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
3.20863Mh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
43.6858Mh · 218.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
18.373182Mh · 164.0W
|
— | $0.39 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.149Mh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
28.941479Mh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
497.2532Mh · 200.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
TimeTravel10
57.10385Mh · 223.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
52.626567Mh · 160.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
47.66303Mh · 208.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
17.20334Mh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
10.309456Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
9.70908Mh · 179.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
X16S
10.3291Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X17
10.257302Mh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
3.188779Mh · 154.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckatoo31
1Hh · 226.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
7.505757Mh · 165.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.9Hh · 192.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
117.777183Mh · 131.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
9.59665Mh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
31.000657Mh · 227.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.041749319Gh · 226.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
2.82440006Gh · 221.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
8.51459Mh · 188.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
915Hh · 131.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
58.7911Mh · 204.0W
|
— | $0.49 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
54.12Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
30.497Hh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
376Hh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
5.328Kh · 143.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
8.692930736Gh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
57.748Kh · 223.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
10.508252Mh · 153.0W
|
— | $0.37 | — |
|
—
|
C11
14.9781Mh · 159.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
65Hh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
77Hh · 226.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
30Hh · 217.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
376Hh · 222.0W
|
— | $0.53 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
6.432981Mh · 171.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.48373136Gh · 224.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.4651Gh · 223.0W
|
— | $0.54 | — |
| 矿池 | 支持算法 | 费率 | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 1.0% | Visit → |
kriptokyng.com
|
Etchash (ETC) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) · RandomX (XMR) | 1.0% | Visit → |
SupportXMR
|
RandomX (XMR) | 0.6% | Visit → |
出售算力收益历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.32 | $9.70 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.54 | $16.20 |
| 利润 | $-0.22 | $-6.50 |
内部共识混合值 — 来自多个外部来源,不是任何单一市场的原始报价。
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $0.13/day
访问 on MRR →
MRR
访问 on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia CMP 50HX 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 21.29 kg |
| Nuclear | 23.22 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 46.45 kg |
| Geothermal | 73.54 kg |
| Solar | 87.09 kg |
| Biofuels | 445.13 kg |
| Gas | 948.33 kg |
| Coal | 1,587.0 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia CMP 50HX running 24/7 for a year releases about 919 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia CMP 50HX's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,587 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 46 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.