Nvidia RTX 4070 — AI 出租
Nvidia RTX 4070 每天净赚 $0.30 挖 Octopus 算力 58.2092 Mh/s 功耗 173.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情有利润。
Nvidia RTX 4070 在 Vast.ai、RunPod、io.net 及其他 AI 算力市场的实时 GPU 租赁价格。每一行展示扣除平台手续费后的主机日净收益、当前利用率,以及在 $0.1/kWh 电价下的回本期。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $3.56 | $106.94 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $3.15 | $94.48 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.2092Mh · 173.0W
|
$0.72 | $0.42 | $0.30 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
48.56Hh · 188.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.45 | $-0.28 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
30.0441Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.48 | $-0.35 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
120.0351Mh · 125.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.30 | $-0.25 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
58.442Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.41 | $-0.38 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.11Hh · 186.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.45 | $-0.43 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.4138Mh · 91.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
110.7415Mh · 192.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
959.5945Mh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.4749Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
42.028Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.7194Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.7195Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
1.1965Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
129.0154Mh · 169.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.8672Mh · 166.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
26.9675Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
26.9144Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
24.9943Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
7.8252Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
90.9Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
9.6892Mh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
18.5821Mh · 174.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
825.2037Mh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
6.8321Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4972Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.3103Gh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
3.5833Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
16.8381Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.266Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
3.2302Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
19.4837Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.7553Gh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowVeil
29.9741Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
107.9657Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
58.442Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
7.1359Gh · 142.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.6879Gh · 188.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
45Hh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
368.04Hh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
10.9595Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
31.8766Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
68.381Hh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
96.3Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
12.7813Mh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.857Gh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.8529Gh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
8.2824Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
- Base Clock
- 1920 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2480 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 5888
- GPU Power
- 200 W
- Max Memory Size
- 12 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Release
- April 2023
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$2.18
★
$2.60 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$218.01
★
$218.43 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$4.27
$4.69 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$3.14
★
$3.56 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$3.47
★
$3.89 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000725400 BTC/M/d
|
$4.28
$4.70 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
$0.14 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.08
★
$0.50 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$2.50
★
$2.92 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014317 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
$0.65 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000078000 BTC/M/d
|
$1.11
★
$1.53 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.82
★
$1.24 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000079195 BTC/M/d
|
$1.13
$1.55 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000056560 BTC/M/d
|
$0.77
★
$1.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.87
★
$1.29 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000056587 BTC/M/d
|
$0.77
$1.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000064046 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.12 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.20
★
$0.62 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.19
★
$0.61 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.28
$0.70 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000827 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.36
$0.06 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.08
★
$0.50 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.58 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.08
$0.50 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002288 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.03 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.14 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.30 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000014372 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005686 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.13 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012233 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.29 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012495 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.29 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012321 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.29 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002136 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000007200 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.22 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004432 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.25
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001916 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
★
$0.09 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000559 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.03 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001567 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001217 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
$0.06 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000557 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000258701 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000367000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000517000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000179 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4070 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.44 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.94 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.87 kg |
| Geothermal | 56.8 kg |
| Solar | 67.26 kg |
| Biofuels | 343.79 kg |
| Gas | 732.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,225.67 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 710 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,226 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 36 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $3.56 | $106.94 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.42 | $12.60 |
| 利润 | $3.15 | $94.48 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
58.2092Mh · 173.0W
|
$0.72 | $0.42 | $0.30 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
48.56Hh · 188.0W
|
$0.17 | $0.45 | $-0.28 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
30.0441Mh · 200.0W
|
$0.13 | $0.48 | $-0.35 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
120.0351Mh · 125.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.30 | $-0.25 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
58.442Mh · 170.0W
|
$0.03 | $0.41 | $-0.38 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
10.11Hh · 186.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.45 | $-0.43 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.4138Mh · 91.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.22 | $-0.21 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
110.7415Mh · 192.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
959.5945Mh · 198.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
2.4749Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
42.028Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
29.7194Mh · 178.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
29.7195Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
1.1965Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
129.0154Mh · 169.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
56.8672Mh · 166.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
26.9675Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
26.9144Mh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
24.9943Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
7.8252Mh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
90.9Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
vProgPow
9.6892Mh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
18.5821Mh · 174.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
825.2037Mh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
6.8321Mh · 139.0W
|
— | $0.33 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
29.4972Mh · 176.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
1.3103Gh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
3.5833Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
16.8381Mh · 157.0W
|
— | $0.38 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.266Kh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
3.2302Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
19.4837Mh · 189.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
1.7553Gh · 99.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowVeil
29.9741Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
107.9657Mh · 180.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
58.442Mh · 170.0W
|
— | $0.41 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
7.1359Gh · 142.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
1.6879Gh · 188.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
45Hh · 184.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
368.04Hh · 177.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
10.9595Gh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
31.8766Mh · 187.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
68.381Hh · 186.0W
|
— | $0.45 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
96.3Hh · 199.0W
|
— | $0.48 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
12.7813Mh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
1.857Gh · 181.0W
|
— | $0.43 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
1.8529Gh · 185.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
8.2824Mh · 110.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
- Base Clock
- 1920 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 2480 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 5888
- GPU Power
- 200 W
- Max Memory Size
- 12 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR6X
- Release
- April 2023
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MRR
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000030000 BTC/M/d
|
$2.18
★
$2.60 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00002520563 BTC/M/d
|
$218.01
★
$218.43 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2REv2
0.00000054154 BTC/M/d
|
$4.27
$4.69 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Lyra2z | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Lyra2z
0.00000550000 BTC/M/d
|
$3.14
★
$3.56 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Lyra2z
0.00000600172 BTC/M/d
|
$3.47
★
$3.89 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Lyra2z
0.00000725400 BTC/M/d
|
$4.28
$4.70 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Octopus | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
$0.14 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.08
★
$0.50 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$2.50
★
$2.92 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014317 BTC/M/d
|
$0.23
$0.65 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| X16Rv2 | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16Rv2
0.00000078000 BTC/M/d
|
$1.11
★
$1.53 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16Rv2
0.00000063655 BTC/M/d
|
$0.82
★
$1.24 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16Rv2
0.00000079195 BTC/M/d
|
$1.13
$1.55 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| X16R | |||||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
X16R
0.00000056560 BTC/M/d
|
$0.77
★
$1.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
X16R
0.00000061118 BTC/M/d
|
$0.87
★
$1.29 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
X16R
0.00000056587 BTC/M/d
|
$0.77
$1.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| NeoScrypt | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000064046 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.30
$0.12 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000320000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.20
★
$0.62 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000314000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.19
★
$0.61 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NeoScrypt
0.00000359000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.28
$0.70 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000827 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.36
$0.06 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.08
★
$0.50 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.16
★
$0.58 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$0.08
$0.50 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| VerusHash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
VerusHash
0.00000002288 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.03 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
VerusHash
0.00000010999 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.28
★
$0.14 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
VerusHash
0.00000023020 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.30 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
VerusHash
0.00000014372 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.23
$0.19 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005686 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.29
$0.13 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
5% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012233 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.29 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012495 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.29 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012321 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.29 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002136 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.41
$0.01 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000007200 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.20
★
$0.22 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.34
$0.08 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004432 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.25
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000001916 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.33
★
$0.09 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000559 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.39
$0.03 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001320 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001567 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.35
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001217 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.36
$0.06 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000557 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.37
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000258701 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR floor
7% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000367000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000517000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.42
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000179 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.42
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.42 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX 4070 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 16.44 kg |
| Nuclear | 17.94 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 35.87 kg |
| Geothermal | 56.8 kg |
| Solar | 67.26 kg |
| Biofuels | 343.79 kg |
| Gas | 732.41 kg |
| Coal | 1,225.67 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX 4070 running 24/7 for a year releases about 710 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX 4070's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,226 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 36 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.