LP Agent
Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB
Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB 每天净赚 $0.77 挖 FishHash 算力 26 Mh/s 功耗 80.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情有利润。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.96 | $28.94 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.19 | $5.70 |
| 利润 | $0.77 | $23.18 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
26Mh · 80.0W
|
$0.96 | $0.19 | $0.77 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
34.0Mh · 70.0W
|
$0.39 | $0.17 | $0.22 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
21Hh · 80.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.19 | $-0.12 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
15Mh · 80.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.19 | $-0.13 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.18Hh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
39Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
34Mh · 70.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.17 | $-0.11 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
100Mh · 80.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.19 | $-0.15 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
33Hh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
39Mh · 80.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.19 | $-0.17 |
|
—
|
Blake3
600Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
400Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
290Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
750Kh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
18Kh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
2.4Gh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
15Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
LP Agent
- Architecture
- Ampere
- Base Clock
- 1200 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 1200 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 3328
- GPU Power
- 70 W
- Max Memory Size
- 6 GB
- Memory Bandwidth
- 288 GB/s
- Memory Type
- GDDR6
- Mining algos
- 18
- Model
- RTX A2000 6GB
- Power
- 80 W
- Process
- 8 nm
- Release
- August 2021
- Release year
- 2021
- TDP
- 80 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003033 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
$0.08 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.28 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$1.46
★
$1.65 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014949 BTC/M/d
|
$0.20
$0.39 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002182 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.06 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006693 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.02
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$0.66
★
$0.85 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
$0.30 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003165 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.06 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.05
★
$0.24 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
★
$0.30 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024326 BTC/M/d
|
$0.29
$0.48 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.06 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.07
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.21 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
$0.14 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.17
$0.02 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
★
$0.18 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.21 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
$0.18 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.01 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
$0.04 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000547 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263526 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000049869 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
20% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000074390 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000070800 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 7.6 kg |
| Nuclear | 8.29 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 16.59 kg |
| Geothermal | 26.27 kg |
| Solar | 31.1 kg |
| Biofuels | 158.98 kg |
| Gas | 338.69 kg |
| Coal | 566.78 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 328 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 567 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 17 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.96 | $28.94 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.19 | $5.70 |
| 利润 | $0.77 | $23.18 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
26Mh · 80.0W
|
$0.96 | $0.19 | $0.77 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
34.0Mh · 70.0W
|
$0.39 | $0.17 | $0.22 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
21Hh · 80.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.19 | $-0.12 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
15Mh · 80.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.19 | $-0.13 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
0.18Hh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
39Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
34Mh · 70.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.17 | $-0.11 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
100Mh · 80.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.19 | $-0.15 |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
33Hh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
39Mh · 80.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.19 | $-0.17 |
|
—
|
Blake3
600Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
400Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
290Mh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
750Kh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
18Kh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
SHA512256d
2.4Gh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
15Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
- Architecture
- Ampere
- Base Clock
- 1200 MHz
- Boost Clock
- 1200 MHz
- CUDA cores
- 3328
- GPU Power
- 70 W
- Max Memory Size
- 6 GB
- Memory Bandwidth
- 288 GB/s
- Memory Type
- GDDR6
- Mining algos
- 18
- Model
- RTX A2000 6GB
- Power
- 80 W
- Process
- 8 nm
- Release
- August 2021
- Release year
- 2021
- TDP
- 80 W
- Type
- GPU
- Vendor
- Nvidia
| 市场 | 算法 | 利润 /天 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Octopus
0.00000003033 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.11
$0.08 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Octopus
0.00000011000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.09
★
$0.28 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Octopus
0.00000064110 BTC/M/d
|
$1.46
★
$1.65 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Octopus
0.00000014949 BTC/M/d
|
$0.20
$0.39 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| NexaPoW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
NexaPoW
0.00000002182 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.06 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
NexaPoW
0.00000006693 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.02
★
$0.17 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
NexaPoW
0.00000032850 BTC/M/d
|
$0.66
★
$0.85 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
NexaPoW
0.00000011682 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
$0.30 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| FishHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
FishHash
0.00000003165 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.06 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
FishHash
0.00000012000 BTC/M/d
|
$0.05
★
$0.24 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
FishHash
0.00000015078 BTC/M/d
|
$0.11
★
$0.30 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
FishHash
0.00000024326 BTC/M/d
|
$0.29
$0.48 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| KAWPOW | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KAWPOW
0.00000005555 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
$0.06 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KAWPOW
0.00000010622 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.07
★
$0.12 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KAWPOW
0.00000018826 BTC/M/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.21 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KAWPOW
0.00000012485 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.05
$0.14 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| Zhash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Zhash
0.00000000688 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.17
$0.02 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
0% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
★
$0.18 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Zhash
0.00000008185 BTC/H/d
|
$0.02
★
$0.21 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Zhash
0.00000007080 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.01
$0.18 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| BeamHashIII | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
BeamHashIII
0.00000004248 BTC/H/d
|
$-0.12
★
$0.07 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Ethash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Ethash
0.00000002000 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.13
★
$0.06 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Etchash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Etchash
0.00000000503 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.18
$0.01 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
1% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Etchash
0.00000001223 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Etchash
0.00000001578 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.14
★
$0.05 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Etchash
0.00000001214 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
$0.04 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| Autolykos2 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Autolykos2
0.00000000547 BTC/M/d
|
$-0.15
★
$0.04 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| KHeavyHash | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000263526 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
6% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000280000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000387000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
KHeavyHash
0.00000528000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| Blake3 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Blake3
0.00000000178 BTC/G/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
| Sha256 | |||||
|
NiceHash
seller 24h-weighted avg
|
Sha256
0.00000049869 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR floor
20% rented · matches cheapest seller
|
Sha256
0.00000068000 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR recent
last 10 rentals · actual clearing price
|
Sha256
0.00000074390 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
★
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
访问 →
|
|||
|
MRR asking
aspirational — seller wish, not matched
|
Sha256
0.00000070800 BTC/T/d
|
$-0.19
$0.00 收入 · $0.19 成本
|
|||
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 7.6 kg |
| Nuclear | 8.29 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 16.59 kg |
| Geothermal | 26.27 kg |
| Solar | 31.1 kg |
| Biofuels | 158.98 kg |
| Gas | 338.69 kg |
| Coal | 566.78 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB running 24/7 for a year releases about 328 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia RTX A2000 6GB's annual footprint swings from roughly 567 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 17 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.