AMD RX 6750 XT — 挖矿
AMD RX 6750 XT 每天净亏 $0.28 挖 KAWPOW 算力 26.24 Mh/s 功耗 148.0 W. 这是在扣除 $0.1/kWh 电费后的结果 — 按当前行情暂未回本。
AMD RX 6750 XT 挖 KAWPOW 效率最高。本页包含完整的算法排行榜、联合挖矿选项、推荐矿池,以及可点击任意一行切换的历史收益图表。
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.28 | $8.27 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.36 | $10.80 |
| 利润 | $-0.08 | $-2.53 |
算法收益历史 ▶ KAWPOW
若以 $0.1/kWh 持续挖该算法,每日净收益 $/天。点击上方任意算法可切换。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.08 | $2.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.36 | $10.80 |
| 利润 | $-0.28 | $-8.40 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
26.24Mh · 148.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.36 | $-0.28 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
57.92Mh · 120.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.29 | $-0.24 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
76.863Mh · 149.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.36 | $-0.31 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
24.5286Mh · 169.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.41 | $-0.40 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
67.0312Mh · 201.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.48 | $-0.47 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
404.7812Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
14.3754Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
25.7441Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
57.92Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
23.4481Mh · 213.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
58Hh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
21.0395Mh · 211.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-16000
9.9489Kh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
2.608Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
6.9046Gh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
26.1033Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
8.9106Th · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
556.3001Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
606.4188Kh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
2.6076Gh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.1024Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.26Kh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
39.7265Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
26.347Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
23.4289Mh · 211.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
115.3905Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
32.15Hh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
38.9854Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
27.8088Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
36.395Hh · 215.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
15.5727Mh · 211.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
61.4Hh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
846.5325Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.28 | $8.27 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.36 | $10.80 |
| 利润 | $-0.08 | $-2.53 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD RX 6750 XT 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 14.07 kg |
| Nuclear | 15.34 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 30.69 kg |
| Geothermal | 48.59 kg |
| Solar | 57.54 kg |
| Biofuels | 294.11 kg |
| Gas | 626.57 kg |
| Coal | 1,048.55 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 6750 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 607 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 6750 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,049 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 31 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
此 GPU 仅有 ? GB 显存 — 大多数 AI 市场要求至少 12 GB。
每日预测
每日各收入流的胜出值 — 来自该矿机的历史记录,在 $0.1/kWh 下计算的平均值
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.28 | $8.27 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.36 | $10.80 |
| 利润 | $-0.08 | $-2.53 |
算法收益历史 ▶ KAWPOW
若以 $0.1/kWh 持续挖该算法,每日净收益 $/天。点击上方任意算法可切换。
每日预测
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.08 | $2.40 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.36 | $10.80 |
| 利润 | $-0.28 | $-8.40 |
| Coin | Algorithm | 收入 | 成本 | 利润 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
26.24Mh · 148.0W
|
$0.08 | $0.36 | $-0.28 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
57.92Mh · 120.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.29 | $-0.24 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
76.863Mh · 149.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.36 | $-0.31 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
24.5286Mh · 169.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.41 | $-0.40 |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
67.0312Mh · 201.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.48 | $-0.47 |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
404.7812Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
14.3754Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
25.7441Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
57.92Mh · 120.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
23.4481Mh · 213.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
58Hh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
21.0395Mh · 211.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d-16000
9.9489Kh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
2.608Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
6.9046Gh · 193.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
26.1033Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
8.9106Th · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
556.3001Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Verthash
606.4188Kh · 168.0W
|
— | $0.40 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
2.6076Gh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.1024Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
1.26Kh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
39.7265Mh · 182.0W
|
— | $0.44 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
26.347Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
23.4289Mh · 211.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Tribus
115.3905Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash192_7
32.15Hh · 190.0W
|
— | $0.46 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
38.9854Mh · 175.0W
|
— | $0.42 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
27.8088Mh · 209.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
36.395Hh · 215.0W
|
— | $0.52 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
15.5727Mh · 211.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
61.4Hh · 212.0W
|
— | $0.51 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
846.5325Mh · 210.0W
|
— | $0.50 | — |
净算力市场收入历史
| 周期 | /日 | /月 |
|---|---|---|
| 收入 | $0.28 | $8.27 |
|
成本
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.36 | $10.80 |
| 利润 | $-0.08 | $-2.53 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
AMD RX 6750 XT 的回本周期
测算此设备的回本周期、电费和首年收益。
曲线穿过零点即回本。之后全是利润。
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
按能源来源的年度排放
基于年度耗电量和常见电网的碳强度。
| 能源来源 | CO₂e / 年 |
|---|---|
| Wind | 14.07 kg |
| Nuclear | 15.34 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 30.69 kg |
| Geothermal | 48.59 kg |
| Solar | 57.54 kg |
| Biofuels | 294.11 kg |
| Gas | 626.57 kg |
| Coal | 1,048.55 kg |
仅为估算 — 实际排放因硬件、冷却和电网而异。
这意味着什么?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, AMD RX 6750 XT running 24/7 for a year releases about 607 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
你在哪里接电很重要
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that AMD RX 6750 XT's annual footprint swings from roughly 1,049 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 31 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
如何减少该矿机的碳足迹
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
常见问题
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.