LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 — Amortisation
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 verdient bis zu $1.51 pro Tag, am besten beim Schürfen von FishHash bei 12.0 Mh/s. Auch verfügbar: NeoScrypt-Hashpower-Verkauf ($-0.17/Tag). Zieht 140 W aus der Steckdose — bei $0.10/kWh, bei heutigen Preisen profitabel.
Tippen zum Wechseln · 7 Abschnitte Amortisation 6/7
Diese GPU hat 8 GB VRAM — die meisten KI-Marktplätze verlangen mindestens 12 GB.
Tägliche Prognose
Tägliche Sieger-Streams — gemittelt aus dem aufgezeichneten Verlauf des Rigs bei $0.1/kWh
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $1.85 | $55.47 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Gewinn | $1.51 | $45.27 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
LP Agent
Cheapest cloud GPUs for AI
Compare staking yields across networks.
Live gold + precious-metal spot prices.
Vietnamese product price comparison.
Tech reviews and gadget deep-dives.
Live RSI screener across stocks and crypto.
War diese Seite hilfreich?
Danke für das Feedback!
Noch etwas, das wir wissen sollten? Das Formular ist unten geöffnet.
Mining-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $1.85 | $55.50 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Gewinn | $1.51 | $45.30 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Algorithmus | Netto / Tag |
|---|---|
|
FishHash
★ Bester
12.0 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$1.51 |
|
PearlHash
21 Th/s · 110.0 W
|
$0.54 |
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5 Hh/s · 70.0 W
|
$0.41 |
|
NeoScrypt
858.11 Kh/s · 128.0 W
|
$-0.04 |
|
Octopus
23.89169 Mh/s · 132.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
BeamHashIII
16 Hh/s · 124.0 W
|
$-0.27 |
|
NexaPoW
8.085 Mh/s · 86.0 W
|
$-0.27 |
|
KAWPOW
12.3 Mh/s · 129.0 W
|
$-0.29 |
|
Autolykos2
79.83 Mh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
Zhash
30 Hh/s · 113.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
CuckooCycle
4 Hh/s · 116.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
VerusHash
5.1449 Mh/s · 100.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
Etchash
23.202878 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638 Mh/s · 126.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
IronFish
5 Gh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256 Mh/s · 115.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
X16
X16R
10.33799 Mh/s · 107.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
7.1533 Mh/s · 108.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
1.124 Hh/s · 95.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Blake3
34.0 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Ethash
23.202878 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
1.4 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
1.8 Gh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Sha256
300 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
110 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
29 Mh/s · 80.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
MER
Meraki
26.5 Mh/s · 80.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
180 Hh/s · 121.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
2 Kh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
QHA
Qhash
55 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
TON
Ton
1.4 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
400 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.319251631 Gh/s · 109.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KEC
Keccak
604.42849 Mh/s · 108.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145 Mh/s · 132.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Lyra2z
2.50804 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
NIS
NIST5
20.26063 Mh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
12.0Mh · 140.0W
|
$1.85 | $0.34 | $1.51 |
PRL
PRL
|
PearlHash
21Th · 110.0W
|
$0.88 | $0.26 | $0.62 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
$0.75 | $0.17 | $0.58 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.31 | $-0.01 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.32 | $-0.23 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.30 | $-0.23 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.21 | $-0.14 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.31 | $-0.26 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.14 | $-0.10 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.27 | $-0.23 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.28 | $-0.27 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.24 | $-0.23 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.18 | $-0.17 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.5Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.8Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
300Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
110Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
29Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
2Kh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
55Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
400Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
| Pool | Unterstützte Algos | Gebühr | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 0.0% | Visit → |
antpool.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
braiins.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
Cedric Crispin Pools
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Sha256 (BTC) · FiroPoW (FIRO) | — | Visit → |
f2pool.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
foundrydigital.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
headframe.io
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
k1pool.com
|
PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → |
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → |
Molepool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
nicehash.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
Ocean
|
Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → |
ocean.xyz
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
pearl.herominers.com
|
PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → |
pool.binance.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
poolin.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
prl.suprnova.cc
|
PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
sbicrypto.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
secpool.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
Solopool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
SpiderPool
|
Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → |
Suprnova
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
ultimuspool.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
viabtc.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
|
W
WoolyPooly
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
Hashmarket-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.17 | $5.25 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Gewinn | $-0.17 | $-4.95 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Markt | Bestes Netto / Tag | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$-0.25 | Besuchen → |
MRR
|
$-0.14 | Besuchen → |
MRR
· NeoScrypt
· $-0.14/day
MRR
Besuchen on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation für Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Modelliere Amortisation, Stromkosten und Erstjahresrendite für dieses Gerät.
Hardware-Kosten amortisiert, wenn die Linie 0 kreuzt. Danach reiner Gewinn.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Jährliche Emissionen pro Energiequelle
Basierend auf dem jährlichen Stromverbrauch und der CO₂-Intensität verschiedener Stromnetze.
| Energiequelle | CO₂e / Jahr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 13.31 kg |
| Nuclear | 14.52 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 29.03 kg |
| Geothermal | 45.96 kg |
| Solar | 54.43 kg |
| Biofuels | 278.21 kg |
| Gas | 592.7 kg |
| Coal | 991.87 kg |
Nur Schätzungen — tatsächliche Emissionen variieren.
Was bedeutet das konkret?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 575 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Wo du einsteckst, zählt
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 992 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 29 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
So reduzierst du den Fußabdruck dieses Rigs
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Tippen zum Wechseln · 7 Abschnitte Amortisation 6/7
Diese GPU hat 8 GB VRAM — die meisten KI-Marktplätze verlangen mindestens 12 GB.
Tägliche Prognose
Tägliche Sieger-Streams — gemittelt aus dem aufgezeichneten Verlauf des Rigs bei $0.1/kWh
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $1.85 | $55.47 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Gewinn | $1.51 | $45.27 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
Mining-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $1.85 | $55.50 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Gewinn | $1.51 | $45.30 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Algorithmus | Netto / Tag |
|---|---|
|
FishHash
★ Bester
12.0 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$1.51 |
|
PearlHash
21 Th/s · 110.0 W
|
$0.54 |
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5 Hh/s · 70.0 W
|
$0.41 |
|
NeoScrypt
858.11 Kh/s · 128.0 W
|
$-0.04 |
|
Octopus
23.89169 Mh/s · 132.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
BeamHashIII
16 Hh/s · 124.0 W
|
$-0.27 |
|
NexaPoW
8.085 Mh/s · 86.0 W
|
$-0.27 |
|
KAWPOW
12.3 Mh/s · 129.0 W
|
$-0.29 |
|
Autolykos2
79.83 Mh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
Zhash
30 Hh/s · 113.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
CuckooCycle
4 Hh/s · 116.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
VerusHash
5.1449 Mh/s · 100.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
Etchash
23.202878 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.33 |
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638 Mh/s · 126.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
IronFish
5 Gh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256 Mh/s · 115.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
X16
X16R
10.33799 Mh/s · 107.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
7.1533 Mh/s · 108.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
1.124 Hh/s · 95.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Blake3
34.0 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Ethash
23.202878 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
1.4 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
1.8 Gh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Sha256
300 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
110 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
29 Mh/s · 80.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
MER
Meraki
26.5 Mh/s · 80.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
EQU
Equihash210_9
180 Hh/s · 121.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
2 Kh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
QHA
Qhash
55 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
TON
Ton
1.4 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
400 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.319251631 Gh/s · 109.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
KEC
Keccak
604.42849 Mh/s · 108.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145 Mh/s · 132.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
Lyra2z
2.50804 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
|
NIS
NIST5
20.26063 Mh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.34 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
FishHash
12.0Mh · 140.0W
|
$1.85 | $0.34 | $1.51 |
PRL
PRL
|
PearlHash
21Th · 110.0W
|
$0.88 | $0.26 | $0.62 |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
$0.75 | $0.17 | $0.58 |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
$0.30 | $0.31 | $-0.01 |
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.09 | $0.32 | $-0.23 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.30 | $-0.23 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.21 | $-0.14 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.31 | $-0.26 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.14 | $-0.10 |
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.27 | $-0.23 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.28 | $-0.27 |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.24 | $-0.23 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.01 | $0.18 | $-0.17 |
|
MONA
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.5Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.8Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
300Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
110Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
29Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash210_9
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
2Kh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
55Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
400Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
| Pool | Unterstützte Algos | Gebühr | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
|
★
AntPool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | 0.0% | Visit → |
antpool.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
braiins.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
Cedric Crispin Pools
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Sha256 (BTC) · FiroPoW (FIRO) | — | Visit → |
f2pool.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
foundrydigital.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
headframe.io
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
k1pool.com
|
PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → |
|
|
Autolykos2 (ERG) · PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → |
Molepool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Etchash (ETC) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
|
N
Nanopool
|
Octopus (CFX) · KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
nicehash.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
Ocean
|
Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → |
ocean.xyz
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
pearl.herominers.com
|
PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → |
pool.binance.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
pool.kryptex.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
poolin.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
prl.suprnova.cc
|
PearlHash (PRL) | — | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
sbicrypto.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
secpool.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
Solopool
|
Etchash (ETC) · KHeavyHash (KAS) | — | Visit → |
SpiderPool
|
Sha256 (BTC) | 0.0% | Visit → |
Suprnova
|
KAWPOW (RVN) | — | Visit → |
ultimuspool.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
viabtc.com
|
Sha256 (BTC) | — | Visit → |
|
W
WoolyPooly
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · Octopus (CFX) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | — | Visit → |
Hashmarket-Auszahlungen — Verlauf
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.17 | $5.25 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.34 | $10.20 |
| Gewinn | $-0.17 | $-4.95 |
Interner Konsens-Mix — abgeleitet aus externen Quellen, kein Roh-Preis eines einzelnen Marktes.
| Markt | Bestes Netto / Tag | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$-0.25 | Besuchen → |
MRR
|
$-0.14 | Besuchen → |
MRR
· NeoScrypt
· $-0.14/day
MRR
Besuchen on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation für Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Modelliere Amortisation, Stromkosten und Erstjahresrendite für dieses Gerät.
Hardware-Kosten amortisiert, wenn die Linie 0 kreuzt. Danach reiner Gewinn.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Jährliche Emissionen pro Energiequelle
Basierend auf dem jährlichen Stromverbrauch und der CO₂-Intensität verschiedener Stromnetze.
| Energiequelle | CO₂e / Jahr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 13.31 kg |
| Nuclear | 14.52 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 29.03 kg |
| Geothermal | 45.96 kg |
| Solar | 54.43 kg |
| Biofuels | 278.21 kg |
| Gas | 592.7 kg |
| Coal | 991.87 kg |
Nur Schätzungen — tatsächliche Emissionen variieren.
Was bedeutet das konkret?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 575 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Wo du einsteckst, zählt
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 992 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 29 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
So reduzierst du den Fußabdruck dieses Rigs
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.