Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 — Mining
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 verdient bis zu $0.03 pro Tag, am besten beim Schürfen von Octopus bei 23.89169 Mh/s. Auch verfügbar: KI-Vermietung zu $0.01/h ($0.14/Tag) and KAWPOW-Hashpower-Verkauf ($0.19/Tag). Zieht 132 W aus der Steckdose — bei $0.10/kWh, bei heutigen Preisen profitabel.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 mined Octopus am effizientesten. Diese Seite zeigt die vollständige Algorithmus-Rangliste, Merged-Mining-Optionen, empfohlene Pools und ein Auszahlungsverlaufsdiagramm, das durch Klicken auf eine beliebige Zeile umgeschaltet werden kann.
Tägliche Prognose
Tägliche Sieger-Streams — gemittelt aus dem aufgezeichneten Verlauf des Rigs bei $0.1/kWh
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.35 | $10.45 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Gewinn | $0.03 | $0.85 |
Algorithmus-Auszahlungsverlauf ▶ Octopus
Netto $/Tag, wenn dieser Algorithmus durchgehend bei $0.1/kWh gemined würde. Klicke oben auf einen Algorithmus, um zu wechseln.
Tägliche Prognose
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.35 | $10.50 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Gewinn | $0.03 | $0.90 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.35 | $0.32 | $0.03 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.30 | $-0.23 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.28 | $-0.22 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.31 | $-0.26 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.14 | $-0.09 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.18 | $-0.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
5Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
300Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.5Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.8Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
2Kh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
55Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
400Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
29Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
110Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
| Pool | Unterstützte Algos | Gebühr | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
| Anbieter | GPU | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clore Ai
GPU-Marktplatz
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 Angebot
|
$0.18
96.66 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00184
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Besuchen →
|
Einnahmenfluss So verdient Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 auf dem KI-GPU-Marktplatz how we got $-0.14/day · ▾
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 verdient $0.03/Tag beim Mining von Octopus, was derzeit die $-0.14/Tag aus KI-Vermietung übertrifft. Mietraten ändern sich täglich — regelmäßig prüfen.
Verlauf der Netto-Mieteinnahmen
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.18 | $5.40 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Gewinn | $-0.14 | $-4.20 |
Verlauf der Netto-Hashmarket-Einnahmen
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.13 | $3.88 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Gewinn | $-0.19 | $-5.72 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation für Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Modelliere Amortisation, Stromkosten und Erstjahresrendite für dieses Gerät.
Hardware-Kosten amortisiert, wenn die Linie 0 kreuzt. Danach reiner Gewinn.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Jährliche Emissionen pro Energiequelle
Basierend auf dem jährlichen Stromverbrauch und der CO₂-Intensität verschiedener Stromnetze.
| Energiequelle | CO₂e / Jahr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.69 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 27.37 kg |
| Geothermal | 43.34 kg |
| Solar | 51.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 262.31 kg |
| Gas | 558.84 kg |
| Coal | 935.19 kg |
Nur Schätzungen — tatsächliche Emissionen variieren.
Was bedeutet das konkret?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 542 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Wo du einsteckst, zählt
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 935 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
So reduzierst du den Fußabdruck dieses Rigs
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Tägliche Prognose
Tägliche Sieger-Streams — gemittelt aus dem aufgezeichneten Verlauf des Rigs bei $0.1/kWh
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.35 | $10.45 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Gewinn | $0.03 | $0.85 |
Algorithmus-Auszahlungsverlauf ▶ Octopus
Netto $/Tag, wenn dieser Algorithmus durchgehend bei $0.1/kWh gemined würde. Klicke oben auf einen Algorithmus, um zu wechseln.
Tägliche Prognose
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.35 | $10.50 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Gewinn | $0.03 | $0.90 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.35 | $0.32 | $0.03 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.30 | $-0.23 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.06 | $0.28 | $-0.22 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.31 | $-0.26 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.14 | $-0.09 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.18 | $-0.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
5Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
300Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.5Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.8Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
2Kh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
55Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
400Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
29Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
110Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
| Pool | Unterstützte Algos | Gebühr | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
| Anbieter | GPU | Einnahmen | Kosten | Gewinn |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clore Ai
GPU-Marktplatz
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 Angebot
|
$0.18
96.66 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00184
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Besuchen →
|
Einnahmenfluss So verdient Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 auf dem KI-GPU-Marktplatz how we got $-0.14/day · ▾
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 verdient $0.03/Tag beim Mining von Octopus, was derzeit die $-0.14/Tag aus KI-Vermietung übertrifft. Mietraten ändern sich täglich — regelmäßig prüfen.
Verlauf der Netto-Mieteinnahmen
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.18 | $5.40 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Gewinn | $-0.14 | $-4.20 |
Verlauf der Netto-Hashmarket-Einnahmen
| Zeitraum | /Tag | /Monat |
|---|---|---|
| Einnahmen | $0.13 | $3.88 |
|
Kosten
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Gewinn | $-0.19 | $-5.72 |
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Amortisation für Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Modelliere Amortisation, Stromkosten und Erstjahresrendite für dieses Gerät.
Hardware-Kosten amortisiert, wenn die Linie 0 kreuzt. Danach reiner Gewinn.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Jährliche Emissionen pro Energiequelle
Basierend auf dem jährlichen Stromverbrauch und der CO₂-Intensität verschiedener Stromnetze.
| Energiequelle | CO₂e / Jahr |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.69 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 27.37 kg |
| Geothermal | 43.34 kg |
| Solar | 51.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 262.31 kg |
| Gas | 558.84 kg |
| Coal | 935.19 kg |
Nur Schätzungen — tatsächliche Emissionen variieren.
Was bedeutet das konkret?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 542 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Wo du einsteckst, zählt
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 935 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
So reduzierst du den Fußabdruck dieses Rigs
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.