LP Agent
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 — Đào tiền điện tử
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 kiếm được đến $0.08 mỗi ngày, tốt nhất khi đào Octopus ở 23.89169 Mh/s. Tùy chọn khác: cho thuê AI ở $0.01/giờ ($-0.14/ngày) and bán hashpower KAWPOW ($-0.20/ngày). Tiêu thụ 132 W điện — ở mức $0.10/kWh, có lợi nhuận ở mức giá hiện tại.
Bấm để chuyển · 8 mục Đào tiền điện tử 2/8
Dự báo hàng ngày
Dòng thu chiến thắng mỗi ngày — trung bình từ lịch sử rig tại $0.1/kWh
| Thời kỳ | /Ngày | /Tháng |
|---|---|---|
| Doanh thu | $0.40 | $11.89 |
|
Chi phí
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Lợi nhuận | $0.08 | $2.29 |
Hỗn hợp đồng thuận nội bộ — tổng hợp từ các nguồn bên ngoài, không phải báo giá thô từ một thị trường đơn lẻ.
LP Agent
Lịch sử thu nhập đào
| Thời kỳ | /Ngày | /Tháng |
|---|---|---|
| Doanh thu | $0.40 | $12.00 |
|
Chi phí
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Lợi nhuận | $0.08 | $2.40 |
Hỗn hợp đồng thuận nội bộ — tổng hợp từ các nguồn bên ngoài, không phải báo giá thô từ một thị trường đơn lẻ.
| Thuật toán | Lãi / ngày |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ Tốt nhất
23.89169 Mh/s · 132.0 W
|
$0.08 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
12.3 Mh/s · 129.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
16 Hh/s · 124.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
79.83 Mh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.27 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
4 Hh/s · 116.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
ETC
Etchash
23.202878 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
8.085 Mh/s · 86.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
41.2638 Mh/s · 126.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
IRO
IronFish
5 Gh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
265.066256 Mh/s · 115.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
SHA
Sha256
300 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
2.50804 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
110 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv3
39.65145 Mh/s · 132.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
NIS
NIST5
20.26063 Mh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
ETH
Ethash
23.202878 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
1.124 Hh/s · 95.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
1.4 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
X16
X16R
10.33799 Mh/s · 107.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
KEC
Keccak
604.42849 Mh/s · 108.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
30 Hh/s · 113.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
2.5 Hh/s · 70.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
TON
Ton
1.4 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.319251631 Gh/s · 109.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
1.8 Gh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
7.1533 Mh/s · 108.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
2 Kh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
QHA
Qhash
55 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
400 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
MER
Meraki
26.5 Mh/s · 80.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
858.11 Kh/s · 128.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
BLA
Blake3
34.0 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
VER
VerusHash
5.1449 Mh/s · 100.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
29 Mh/s · 80.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
FIS
FishHash
12.0 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Doanh thu | Chi phí | Lợi nhuận |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.40 | $0.32 | $0.08 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.31 | $-0.24 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.30 | $-0.23 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.14 | $-0.09 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.28 | $-0.24 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.18 | $-0.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
5Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
300Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
110Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.5Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.8Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
2Kh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
55Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
400Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
29Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
| Pool | Thuật toán hỗ trợ | Phí | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Lịch sử thu nhập cho thuê
| Thời kỳ | /Ngày | /Tháng |
|---|---|---|
| Doanh thu | $0.18 | $5.40 |
|
Chi phí
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Lợi nhuận | $-0.14 | $-4.20 |
Hỗn hợp đồng thuận nội bộ — tổng hợp từ các nguồn bên ngoài, không phải báo giá thô từ một thị trường đơn lẻ.
| Nhà cung cấp | GPU | Doanh thu | Chi phí | Lợi nhuận |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
Sàn GPU
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 báo giá
|
$0.18
98.8 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00180
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Xem →
|
Luồng doanh thu Cách Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 kiếm tiền khi cho thuê trên sàn GPU AI how we got $-0.14/day · ▾
Lịch sử thu nhập từ hashpower
| Thời kỳ | /Ngày | /Tháng |
|---|---|---|
| Doanh thu | $0.12 | $3.63 |
|
Chi phí
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Lợi nhuận | $-0.20 | $-5.97 |
Hỗn hợp đồng thuận nội bộ — tổng hợp từ các nguồn bên ngoài, không phải báo giá thô từ một thị trường đơn lẻ.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $-0.12/day
MRR
Xem on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Thời gian hoàn vốn cho Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Ước tính thời gian hoàn vốn, tiền điện và lợi nhuận năm đầu cho thiết bị này.
Khi đường cắt qua 0 là hoàn vốn. Sau đó là lãi ròng.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Khí thải/năm theo nguồn năng lượng
Dựa trên điện năng tiêu thụ/năm và cường độ carbon của các nguồn lưới điện thông dụng.
| Nguồn năng lượng | CO₂e / năm |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.69 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 27.37 kg |
| Geothermal | 43.34 kg |
| Solar | 51.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 262.31 kg |
| Gas | 558.84 kg |
| Coal | 935.19 kg |
Chỉ là ước tính — số liệu thực phụ thuộc vào thiết bị, làm mát và lưới điện.
Con số đó có ý nghĩa gì?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 542 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Nơi cắm điện quan trọng
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 935 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cách giảm dấu chân của máy này
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Câu hỏi thường gặp
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.
Bấm để chuyển · 8 mục Đào tiền điện tử 2/8
Dự báo hàng ngày
Dòng thu chiến thắng mỗi ngày — trung bình từ lịch sử rig tại $0.1/kWh
| Thời kỳ | /Ngày | /Tháng |
|---|---|---|
| Doanh thu | $0.40 | $11.89 |
|
Chi phí
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Lợi nhuận | $0.08 | $2.29 |
Hỗn hợp đồng thuận nội bộ — tổng hợp từ các nguồn bên ngoài, không phải báo giá thô từ một thị trường đơn lẻ.
Lịch sử thu nhập đào
| Thời kỳ | /Ngày | /Tháng |
|---|---|---|
| Doanh thu | $0.40 | $12.00 |
|
Chi phí
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Lợi nhuận | $0.08 | $2.40 |
Hỗn hợp đồng thuận nội bộ — tổng hợp từ các nguồn bên ngoài, không phải báo giá thô từ một thị trường đơn lẻ.
| Thuật toán | Lãi / ngày |
|---|---|
|
OCT
Octopus
★ Tốt nhất
23.89169 Mh/s · 132.0 W
|
$0.08 |
|
KAW
KAWPOW
12.3 Mh/s · 129.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
BEA
BeamHashIII
16 Hh/s · 124.0 W
|
$-0.25 |
|
AUT
Autolykos2
79.83 Mh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.27 |
|
CUC
CuckooCycle
4 Hh/s · 116.0 W
|
$-0.28 |
|
ETC
Etchash
23.202878 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.30 |
|
NEX
NexaPoW
8.085 Mh/s · 86.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv2
41.2638 Mh/s · 126.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
IRO
IronFish
5 Gh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
KHE
KHeavyHash
265.066256 Mh/s · 115.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
SHA
Sha256
300 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
LYR
Lyra2z
2.50804 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
HOO
Hoohash
110 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
LYR
Lyra2REv3
39.65145 Mh/s · 132.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
NIS
NIST5
20.26063 Mh/s · 130.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
ETH
Ethash
23.202878 Mh/s · 75.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
CUC
Cuckarood29
1.124 Hh/s · 95.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
XEL
XelisHashV2
1.4 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
X16
X16R
10.33799 Mh/s · 107.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
KEC
Keccak
604.42849 Mh/s · 108.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
ZHA
Zhash
30 Hh/s · 113.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
CUC
Cuckatoo32
2.5 Hh/s · 70.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
TON
Ton
1.4 Gh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
BLA
Blake (2s)
3.319251631 Gh/s · 109.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
PYR
PyrinHash
1.8 Gh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
X16
X16Rv2
7.1533 Mh/s · 108.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
DYN
DynexSolve
2 Kh/s · 60.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
QHA
Qhash
55 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
KAR
KarlsenHashV2
400 Mh/s · 50.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
MER
Meraki
26.5 Mh/s · 80.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
NEO
NeoScrypt
858.11 Kh/s · 128.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
BLA
Blake3
34.0 Mh/s · 90.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
VER
VerusHash
5.1449 Mh/s · 100.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
ABE
Abelhash
29 Mh/s · 80.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
|
FIS
FishHash
12.0 Mh/s · 140.0 W
|
$-0.32 |
| Coin | Algorithm | Doanh thu | Chi phí | Lợi nhuận |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CFX
⚠
Conflux
|
Octopus
23.89169Mh · 132.0W
|
$0.40 | $0.32 | $0.08 |
|
RVN
Ravencoin
|
KAWPOW
12.3Mh · 129.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.31 | $-0.24 |
|
BEAM
⚠
Beam
|
BeamHashIII
16Hh · 124.0W
|
$0.07 | $0.30 | $-0.23 |
ERG
⚠
Ergo
|
Autolykos2
79.83Mh · 60.0W
|
$0.05 | $0.14 | $-0.09 |
|
AE
⚠
Aeternity
|
CuckooCycle
4Hh · 116.0W
|
$0.04 | $0.28 | $-0.24 |
|
ETC
Ethereum Classic
|
Etchash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
$0.02 | $0.18 | $-0.16 |
NEXA
⚠
Nexa
|
NexaPoW
8.085Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
MONA
⚠
Monacoin
|
Lyra2REv2
41.2638Mh · 126.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
IRON
⚠
Iron Fish
|
IronFish
5Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
KAS
Kaspa
|
KHeavyHash
265.066256Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
BTC
Bitcoin
|
Sha256
300Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
ACM
⚠
Actinium
|
Lyra2z
2.50804Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Hoohash
110Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
VTC
⚠
Vertcoin
|
Lyra2REv3
39.65145Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
NIST5
20.26063Mh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Memehash
13.5Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ethash
23.202878Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
Cuckarood29
1.124Hh · 95.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
XelisHashV2
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash+Scrypt
21.188Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(144,5)
36Hh · 130.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(210,9)
180Hh · 121.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(192,7)
17Hh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
C11
11.754Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16R
10.33799Mh · 107.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak
604.42849Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
PHI1612
11.4209Mh · 89.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
LTZ
⚠
Litecoinz
|
Zhash
30Hh · 113.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
Skein2
60.758816406Gh · 124.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
—
|
Argon2d4096
24.939Kh · 123.0W
|
— | $0.30 | — |
|
GRIN
⚠
Grin
|
Cuckatoo32
2.5Hh · 70.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
BCD
8.670626Mh · 86.0W
|
— | $0.21 | — |
|
—
|
X16RT
7.6345Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
CNReverseWaltz
1.0615Kh · 96.0W
|
— | $0.23 | — |
|
—
|
CryptoNightGPU
1.5Kh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
Ton
1.4Gh · 140.0W
|
— | $0.34 | — |
|
—
|
Blake (2s)
3.319251631Gh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
HMQ1725
4.66437Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Keccak-C
601.31338Mh · 109.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Curvehash
1.7011Mh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
FIRO
Firo
|
FiroPoW
12.752Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
X25X
962.23Kh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Ubqhash
26.19577Mh · 115.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
PyrinHash
1.8Gh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X16Rv2
7.1533Mh · 108.0W
|
— | $0.26 | — |
|
—
|
Xevan
4.02172Mh · 129.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
DynexSolve
2Kh · 60.0W
|
— | $0.14 | — |
|
—
|
Qhash
55Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
KarlsenHashV2
400Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
Meraki
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
FTC
⚠
Feathercoin
|
NeoScrypt
858.11Kh · 128.0W
|
— | $0.31 | — |
|
—
|
SHA256DT
974.038Mh · 122.0W
|
— | $0.29 | — |
|
—
|
GhostRider
643Hh · 79.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Equihash(125,4)
20Hh · 118.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
Radiant
375.818Kh · 114.0W
|
— | $0.27 | — |
|
—
|
EvrProgPow
26.5Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
HeavyHash
208.0494Mh · 69.0W
|
— | $0.17 | — |
|
—
|
Skydoge
300.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
X15
7.99385Mh · 117.0W
|
— | $0.28 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowZ
13.088639Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Blake3
34.0Mh · 90.0W
|
— | $0.22 | — |
|
VRSC
⚠
Verus
|
VerusHash
5.1449Mh · 100.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
|
—
|
zkSNARK
220.0Mh · 50.0W
|
— | $0.12 | — |
|
—
|
ProgPowSERO
13.111107Mh · 132.0W
|
— | $0.32 | — |
|
—
|
Abelhash
29Mh · 80.0W
|
— | $0.19 | — |
|
—
|
Astralhash
11.5656Mh · 75.0W
|
— | $0.18 | — |
|
—
|
X21S
5.2701Mh · 102.0W
|
— | $0.24 | — |
| Pool | Thuật toán hỗ trợ | Phí | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
CuckooCycle (AE) · BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) | 1.0% | Visit → |
HeroMiners
|
BeamHashIII (BEAM) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 0.9% | Visit → |
|
★
K1Pool
|
Sha256 (BTC) · Autolykos2 (ERG) · Etchash (ETC) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Rplant
|
FiroPoW (FIRO) · NexaPoW (NEXA) | 1.0% | Visit → |
Lịch sử thu nhập cho thuê
| Thời kỳ | /Ngày | /Tháng |
|---|---|---|
| Doanh thu | $0.18 | $5.40 |
|
Chi phí
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Lợi nhuận | $-0.14 | $-4.20 |
Hỗn hợp đồng thuận nội bộ — tổng hợp từ các nguồn bên ngoài, không phải báo giá thô từ một thị trường đơn lẻ.
| Nhà cung cấp | GPU | Doanh thu | Chi phí | Lợi nhuận |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clore Ai
Sàn GPU
|
RTX 3050
$0.009/h ·
1 báo giá
|
$0.18
98.8 CLORE/day
1 CLORE ≈ $0.00180
|
$0.32 |
$-0.14
★
Xem →
|
Luồng doanh thu Cách Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 kiếm tiền khi cho thuê trên sàn GPU AI how we got $-0.14/day · ▾
Lịch sử thu nhập từ hashpower
| Thời kỳ | /Ngày | /Tháng |
|---|---|---|
| Doanh thu | $0.12 | $3.63 |
|
Chi phí
$0.1/kWh
|
$0.32 | $9.60 |
| Lợi nhuận | $-0.20 | $-5.97 |
Hỗn hợp đồng thuận nội bộ — tổng hợp từ các nguồn bên ngoài, không phải báo giá thô từ một thị trường đơn lẻ.
MRR
· KAWPOW
· $-0.12/day
MRR
Xem on MRR →
| Rigs × Qty | Share | Rev /rig/day | Cost /rig/day | Profit /rig/day | Total profit /day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | — | — |
Thời gian hoàn vốn cho Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
Ước tính thời gian hoàn vốn, tiền điện và lợi nhuận năm đầu cho thiết bị này.
Khi đường cắt qua 0 là hoàn vốn. Sau đó là lãi ròng.
| Month | Earned (mo) | Cost burned (mo) | Cumulative earned | Cumulative cost | Net | % ROI |
|---|
Khí thải/năm theo nguồn năng lượng
Dựa trên điện năng tiêu thụ/năm và cường độ carbon của các nguồn lưới điện thông dụng.
| Nguồn năng lượng | CO₂e / năm |
|---|---|
| Wind | 12.55 kg |
| Nuclear | 13.69 kg |
| Hydroelectric | 27.37 kg |
| Geothermal | 43.34 kg |
| Solar | 51.32 kg |
| Biofuels | 262.31 kg |
| Gas | 558.84 kg |
| Coal | 935.19 kg |
Chỉ là ước tính — số liệu thực phụ thuộc vào thiết bị, làm mát và lưới điện.
Con số đó có ý nghĩa gì?
At the world-average grid intensity of about 475 g CO₂e/kWh, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 running 24/7 for a year releases about 542 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Here's what that looks like in everyday terms:
Nơi cắm điện quan trọng
Electricity is not one thing. A kilowatt-hour from a coal plant carries roughly 820 g of CO₂; the same kilowatt-hour from a hydro reservoir carries about 24 g. That's a 34× difference — large enough that Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050's annual footprint swings from roughly 935 kg on coal-heavy grids down to about 27 kg on hydro-dominated grids. The single biggest lever a miner has on their carbon footprint is choosing where to plug in.
Regions commonly used for low-carbon crypto mining include Quebec and British Columbia (hydro-dominated, typically <50 g CO₂/kWh), Iceland and Norway (geothermal + hydro, often <30 g), Paraguay (Itaipú hydro), and parts of the US Pacific Northwest. Coal-heavy grids — Kazakhstan, Inner Mongolia, Poland, parts of Australia — sit at the opposite end, often above 700 g CO₂/kWh.
Some operators also reduce their net impact by using otherwise-wasted energy: flare gas at oil wells (burning methane that would be vented anyway), curtailed renewables (wind or solar that the grid can't absorb), or behind-the-meter hydro during off-peak hours. These arrangements can drop effective emissions below the local grid average because the energy would have been wasted or flared without the mining load.
Cách giảm dấu chân của máy này
- Pick a greener ASIC. The efficiency column above matters as much as the grid: a 15 J/TH rig emits roughly half the CO₂ of a 30 J/TH rig for the same hashrate.
- Choose a low-carbon host. Data centres advertising hydro, geothermal, or nuclear power typically sit at <100 g CO₂/kWh.
- Look for stranded or curtailed energy. Flare-gas miners, wind-curtailment co-location, and off-peak hydro arrangements use energy that would otherwise be wasted.
- Use heat recovery. Capturing the heat for greenhouse agriculture, pool heating, or district warmth offsets fossil-fuel heating that would have been burned anyway.
- Time-shift your uptime. In grids with high daytime solar, running more during the day and less at night lowers your effective intensity even if you don't switch providers.
- Purchase verifiable offsets. Treat this as a last resort, not a substitute — and favour additional, permanent, third-party-verified projects (Gold Standard, Verra VCS).
Câu hỏi thường gặp
Yearly electricity use = rig power (W) × 24 × 365 ÷ 1000. We multiply that by each row's grid intensity in grams CO₂-equivalent per kWh and convert to kilograms. Intensities are representative averages — real emissions depend on your specific utility mix, time of day, and local transmission losses.
It depends almost entirely on where the electricity comes from. A single rig plugged into hydro in Quebec emits less over a year than an average family's two cars in a month. The same rig on a coal-dominated grid can exceed that in a few days. The hardware is the same — the grid is what changes the answer.
Network-wide estimates vary by methodology; the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance's Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index is the most widely cited reference. As of recent reporting, the network's sustainable-energy share has grown as more hashrate migrates to hydro, wind, solar, and stranded-gas sites. This page just estimates a single rig — for the big picture, CCAF's dashboard is the best source.
Not directly. The rig draws the same wattage regardless of which pool it joins or how difficulty trends — so its electricity use, and therefore its emissions, stay constant. Those factors change revenue, not power consumption.